临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1155-1158.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.12.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良Karl-storz单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效及对免疫功能和炎症反应的影响

  

  1. 529500 广东省阳江市人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-03 接受日期:2022-03-03 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-20

Effect of modified Karl-Storz single-port laparoscopic surgery on acute appendicitis and its effect on immune function and inflammatory response

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Yangjiang People's Hospital,Guangdong,Yangjiang 529500, China
  • Received:2022-03-03 Accepted:2022-03-03 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-20

摘要: 目的 探讨改良Karl-storz单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效及对病人免疫功能和炎症反应的影响。方法 2019年8月~2020年1月收治的急性阑尾炎病人78例,根据治疗方式的不同分为两组,观察组40例,采用改良Karl-storz单孔腹腔镜手术;对照组38例,采用传统腹腔镜手术。比较两组病人围术期指标、免疫功能指标、炎症因子指标、疼痛指数以及并发症情况。结果 观察组与对照组的手术时间分别为(47.26±6.33)分钟和(45.87±6.28)分钟,拔管时间分别为(2.15±0.84)小时和(2.23±0.89)小时,术后卧床时间分别为(16.46±4.37)小时和(17.82±4.51)小时,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术中出血量为(16.24±3.11)ml,术后肠功能恢复时间(12.14±1.56)小时,住院时间(4.91±1.43)天,对照组分别为(20.15±3.26)ml、(13.85±1.67)小时和(6.02±1.58)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间术前1天和术后7天的CD3+、CD4+、CD8+水平及CD4+/CD8+比值比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后1天时观察组CD3+、CD4+、CD8+及CD4+/CD8+比值与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前1天时血清炎性因子TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8、CRP水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3天时两组病人血清血清炎性因子水平均高于术前,且观察组血清炎性因子水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后1小时、24小时、36小时、48小时、72小时的VAS评分均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术相比,改良Karl-storz单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎疗效显著。

关键词: 急性阑尾炎, Karl-storz, 腹腔镜阑尾切除术, 临床疗效, 免疫功能, 炎症反应

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified Karl-Storz single-port laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis and its effect on immune function and inflammatory response.Methods A total of 78 patients with acute appendicitis admitted to our hospital from August 2019 to January 2020 were selected.According to the different treatment methods,they were divided into the observation group with modified Karl-Storz single-port laparoscopic surgery(n = 40) and the control group with traditional laparoscopic surgery(n=38).The perioperative index,immune function index,pain index and complications were compared in the two groups.Results The operation time and the extubation time in the observation group and the control group were(47.26±6.33)min and(45.87±6.28)min,(2.15±0.84)h and(2.23±0.89)h,respectively.The bed rest time was(16.46±4.37)h and(17.82±4.51)h after operation,respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was(16.24±3.11)ml,the time to recovery of intestinal function was(12.14±1.56) h,and the duration of hospitalization was(4.91±1.43) d,while that in the control group was(20.15±3.26)ml,(13.85±1.67) h and(6.02±1.58) d,respectively(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of CD3+,CD4+,CD8+ and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ between the two groups 1d before operation and 7d after operation(P>0.05).On day 1 after surgery,the ratios of CD3+,CD4+,CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group were significantly different from those in the control group(P<0.05).There were no statistical difference in serum levels of inflammatory factors TNF-α,IL-6,IL-8,and CRP at 1d before surgery(P>0.05).Higher serum inflammatory factors in both groups at 3d later than preoperative(P<0.05),and the serum levels in the observed group were significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05).The VAS scores of the observation group at 12 h,24 h,36 h,48 h and 72 h after operation were significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional laparoscopic appendectomy,modified Karl-storz single-port laparoscopic surgery is effective in treating acute appendicitis.

Key words: acute appendicitis, Karl storz, laparoscopic appendectomy, clinical efficacy, immune function, inflammatory response

[1] 罗耀兵 杨武军 王兴平 李美清. 颅内压监测下阶梯减压术对急诊颅脑创伤病人炎症反应、代谢状态及预后的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 640-643.
[2] 孔韦奇 陈中皓 胡月梅 廖作富 王冰一. 急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后病理诊断为阑尾憩室炎一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 559-560.
[3] 闫照虹 赵建奎. 肠梗阻病人麻醉方案优化及对肠道屏障功能、氧化应激和抑制炎症影响的差异性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1143-1146.
[4] 卢卓才 王晓龙 汤婷婷. 280例急性阑尾炎手术病人腹腔脓液细菌培养与药敏结果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1152-1154.
[5] 陈辉海 薛双桃 赵广超 吴天亮 张俊德. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1073-1076.
[6] 彭永胜 何久盛. 传统顺行置入载距突螺钉与逆行置入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1082-1085.
[7] 李小川 黄春明 罗绍坚 范武 董智晖 蓝根 卢明南 林强祯 陆军海韦健 黎欲强 黄冀. 颈前路Hybrid术式治疗跳跃节段颈椎病的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 65-69.
[8] 岳晖, 裴韶华. 微波消融治疗晚期肺腺癌临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 722-725.
[9] 辛国军 王建承 翁原驰 张俊. 全胰腺切除术9例临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 619-621.
[10] 魏一儒, 薛怀博, 赵国刚. 合并主动脉夹层的急性阑尾炎一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 520-521.
[11] 陈宇, 方汉林, 刘闻. 全胸腔镜手术对肺癌病人的肿瘤标志物神经元特异烯醇化酶、降钙素原、CD3+、CD4+和CD8+的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 140-142.
[12] 李柱威 尹东亮 黎笑兰 王金林 林志强 卢沛林 尹润龙. 预存式自体输血对肝癌手术病人炎症反应及免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 1034-1037.
[13] 路保赛, 尹跃伟, 张艳平等. 复方丹参片联合硫酸镁治疗附睾炎的疗效及对病人血清炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 575-577.
[14] 狄子杨, 唐强, 狄茂军等. 腹腔热灌注化疗治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 433-436.
[15] 陈小保 李明武 刘思义. 腹腔镜诊治疑似急性阑尾炎的临床价值分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 347-349.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵家运 王志刚 潘乐玉. 限制性输血对直肠癌保肛术后并发症影响分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 763 -766 .
[2] 杜晓辉 何长征. 右半结肠癌微创治疗的术式选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 724 -726 .
[3] 邵文雨, 黄新立, 周浩明等. 公民器官捐献供体质量对肝移植术后受体生存率的影响及其感染高危因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 913 -916 .
[4] 魏征, 胡仁旺. 肝脏多发血管瘤术前诊断为肝胆管囊腺癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 124 -125 .
[5] 翁习生. 中国早年人工关节外科发展概要[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 355 -359 .
[6] 罗文婷, 谭碧君, 甘田, 熊智魁, 周利华. 超声引导经皮腹膜后穿刺置管引流前腹腔穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎的临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 412 -415 .
[7] 唐银科, 姚文德, 裴蛟淼, 崔江波, 马显杰. 小切口腋下汗腺清除术的临床效果及相关因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 514 -516 .
[8] 尉志鹏〓罗志强〓韩喆等. 外伤性左心室破裂后心跳停止16分钟抢救成功一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 630 .
[9] 但超, 王黎, 姚启盛等. 可视化穿刺经皮肾镜在儿童肾结石中的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 794 -797 .
[10] 张泉, 赵恺, 王俊文, 张所军, 柯昌庶, 万锋, 舒凯, 雷霆. 青少年松果体区肿瘤MRI影像特点及病理分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 846 -849 .