临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1073-1076.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.11.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效分析

  

  1. 241000 安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院(华东师范大学附属芜湖医院)骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-31 接受日期:2022-03-31 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:张俊德,Email:823195515@qq.com

Analysis of curative effect of unilateral dual-channel spinal endoscopic technique in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

  1. Department of Orthopedic,Wuhu Second People's Hospital,Wuhu Hospital Affiliated to China Normal University,Wuhu 241000, China
  • Received:2022-03-31 Accepted:2022-03-31 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-11-20

摘要: 目的 探讨单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。 方法 2018年1月~2020年3月收治的单节段腰椎管狭窄症病人68例,根据治疗方法分为两组,传统组34例,行传统的半椎板切除减压术;观察组34例,行单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术,比较两组病人的临床疗效以及病人术后康复情况。 结果 传统组术中出血量为(84.53±13.62)ml、手术时间为(52.27±10.89)分钟,住院时间为(11.36±3.51)天,切口长度为(8.53±1.53)cm,观察组分别为(37.82±10.27)ml、(68.42±11.62)分钟、(7.40±2.67)天和(2.31±1.01)cm,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月时,传统组的JOA评分、VAS 评分和ODI 评分分别为(20.24±3.43)、(2.64±0.58)和(19.54±4.21),对照组分别为(22.58±3.61)、(2.21±0.46)和(16.41±5.11),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为11.76%,传统组为17.65%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与传统的半椎板切除减压术比较,单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症创伤更小,术后恢复佳。

关键词: 腰椎管狭窄症, 内镜, 单侧双通道, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy of unilateral dual-channel spinal endoscopic technique in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 68 patients with single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis who were treated in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2020.Among them,34 patients were treated with traditional hemilaminectomy and decompression(traditional group),34 patients Unilateral dual-channel spinal endoscopic technique(observation group) was used to compare the clinical efficacy and postoperative rehabilitation of the two groups of patients. Results Intraoperative blood loss [(84.53±13.62)ml],hospital stay [(11.36±3.51)d] and incision length [(8.53±1.53)cm] in the traditional group were significantly greater than those in the observation group[(37.82±10.27)ml,(7.40±2.67)d and (2.31±1.01)cm](P<0.05).The operation time of the observation group [(68.42±11.62)min] was longer than that of the traditional group[(52.27±10.89)min](P<0.05).At 3 months after operation,the JOA score,VAS score and ODI score of the traditional group were(20.24±3.43),(2.64±0.58),(19.54±4.21),respectively,while those of the control group were(22.58±3.61),(2.21±0.46),(16.41±5.11),the JOA score in the traditional group was significantly lower than that in the observation group(P<0.05),and the VAS score and ODI score in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group(P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in the observation group(11.76%) was slightly lower than that in the traditional group(17.65%)(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional hemilaminectomy and decompression,the unilateral dual-channel spinal endoscopic technique for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis causes less trauma and better postoperative recovery effect.

Key words: lumbar spinal stenosis, endoscopy, unilateral dual channel, clinical efficacy

[1] 周祥 王阳洋 汲乾坤 王仲伟 张志永 金保哲. 神经内镜血肿清除术治疗重型脑室出血并铸型的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 752-756.
[2] 陈建武 李忠民 刘光帅 舒振波. 结直肠气囊肿症一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 756-757.
[3] 刘丹希 孙备. 重症急性胰腺炎治疗的热点问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 617-620.
[4] 杜志勇 郭跃华. 仰卧位无X线监视下ICU床边急诊行内镜鼻胆管引流术治疗急性重症胆管炎[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 657-660.
[5] 袁赵 郑昂. 腹腔镜下脾切除术联合经内镜下套扎序贯硬化剂治疗对门静脉高压症病人的疗效及对其血流动力学及预后的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 691-693.
[6] 徐定凯 杨强 贾艳飞 李强 张新定. 加速康复外科理念在神经内镜经单鼻孔蝶窦入路垂体腺瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(5): 437-440.
[7] 吴永超. 大力开展双通道脊柱内镜手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 301-302.
[8] 蒋毅 左如俊. 双通道脊柱内镜和椎间孔镜的特点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 303-305.
[9] 祁磊 史桂东. 双通道脊柱内镜在颈椎胸椎疾病手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 306-308.
[10] 许卫兵 付豪. 双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 309-312.
[11] 林晓芳 朱承跃 程伟 潘浩 张伟. 双通道脊柱内镜前沿和新技术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 313-317.
[12] 王欢 王振宇 侯海涛 黄相鹏 付松 王亚楠 刘海军 王龙强 邵诗泽 黄奏琴. 经皮内镜与斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗外伤性Ⅰ、Ⅱ度腰椎滑脱的疗效观察 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 323-327.
[13] 肖智勇 吴永超. 双通道脊柱内镜下腰椎融合术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 383-385.
[14] 彭永胜 何久盛. 传统顺行置入载距突螺钉与逆行置入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1082-1085.
[15] 吴波 李玉前 王震. 单侧双通道内镜技术治疗游离型腰椎间盘突出症疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(10): 991-993.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!