临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 514-516.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.06.022

• • 上一篇    下一篇

小切口腋下汗腺清除术的临床效果及相关因素分析

  

  1. 710032 西安,中国人民解放军空军军医大学第一附属医院整形外科
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 马显杰,Email:majing@fmmu.edu.cn

Clinical effects and related issues of subdermal excision of apocrine glands through small incisions for axillary osmidrosis

  1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,Xijing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University,Xi’an 710032,China
  • Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: 目的 探讨小切口腋下汗腺清除术的临床效果及影响手术效果的相关因素。方法 腋下顺皮纹皱襞的小切口腋臭手术病人42例,均为中-重度腋下异味,术后1个月、3个月、6个月随访,观察治疗效果。结果 42例均获随访,平均随访时间5个月,2例(3侧)出现腋下切口愈合不良,创面最大面积约1cm×1.5cm,经换药及清创缝合后愈合,其余均一期愈合;随访发现3例男性1例女性出现单侧腋下异味,属轻度;无血肿、皮瓣坏死及神经损伤发生。结论 顺皮纹皱襞小切口腋下汗腺清除术切口隐蔽、创伤相对小、治疗较为彻底,术后瘢痕小且隐蔽,效果满意。

关键词: 腋臭, 小切口, 汗腺清除, 微创

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate clinical effects and related issues of subdermal excision of apocrine glands through small incisions for axillary osmidrosis.Methods From March 2016 to February 2018,42 cases of moderate-to-severe axillary osmidrosis were treated with subdermal excision of apocrine glands through small incisions along underarm creases.Follow-up was performed in 1,3,6 months.Results All 42 cases were followed up for an average of 5 months.In 2 cases(3 sides),the incision was not well healed.The maximum area of the wound was about 1×1.5 cm, which was healed after dressing and debridement.The rest were all healed naturally.At follow-up,3 males and 1 female relapsed with unilateral subgingival odor,which was mild; no hematoma,flap necrosis and nerve injury occurred.Conclusion After subdermal excision of apocrine glands for axillary osmidrosis,the incision along underarm creases was concealed,the wound was relatively small,and the treatment was thorough.The postoperative scar was small and concealed,and the effect was satisfactory.

Key words: axillary osmidrosis, small incision, apocrine glands removal, minimally invasive

[1] 吴开明, 姚龙, 康宁宁等. 进展期食管癌微创治疗术后远期疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 558-561.
[2] 殷涛, 魏若征, 周颖珂等. 小切口行单纯巨脾切除术13例诊治体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 595-596.
[3] 李迎全, 陈多军, 王飞等. 微创经皮接骨板技术术中双反牵引复位在胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折中的应用效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 600-602.
[4] 王伟, 罗勇, 袁武等. 冠状动脉肌桥的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 603-605.
[5] 赵思桥, 顾始伟, 马顺前, 高战鳌, 贾晓龙, 夏涛, 周文. 拇趾近节趾骨截骨术联合改良小切口第1跖骨截骨术治疗重度拇外翻[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 498-502.
[6] 唐云德, 徐卫国, 于风珍, 尚林强. 椎间孔镜微创技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 439-442.
[7] 罗加龙. SuperPath微创入路全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的近远期效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 300-303.
[8] 李维, 黄永超. 经皮微创内固定联合术后唑来膦酸治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及对T细胞亚群的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 345-348.
[9] 方红, 赵子伟, 韩雪, 姚永强. 麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1cm良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 205-208.
[10] 杨阳, 金伟, 曾寒, 杨敏. 经皮椎间孔镜与Quadrant微创通道下治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 72-75.
[11] 乔林 周玉萍 徐军鹏 陈波 殷杰 张欢 禹晓东. 微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 702-704.
[12] 赵悦 任海军. 不同时机微创颅内血肿穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、脑源性神经营养因子和同型半胱氨酸水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 689-692.
[13] 徐广春, 齐新生. 联合椎板间入路与后外侧入路内镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 946-950.
[14] 汪翔, 卜星平, 吴小涛. 微创单侧入路双侧减压固定与开放双侧减压固定治疗单间隙腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 951-954.
[15] 舒畅 李鑫. 主动脉弓部病变的微创化治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 807-809.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 高纯;胡俊波. 临床营养筛查与评估方法的现状与进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 896 .
[2] 林海鹏;卢晓明;管日戬;等. ω-3鱼油脂肪乳对老年胃癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 907 .
[3] 钱群. 出口梗阻型便秘手术治疗风险控制 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 413 .
[4] 靳凯淇;谢冬;姜格宁. 侵犯脊柱的非小细胞肺癌外科治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 493 .
[5] 侯丁丁 康骅. 近红外荧光在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 719 .
[6] 王志鹏;朱一辰;肖荆;等. 吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗膀胱癌阴茎转移一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(1): 80 .
[7] 徐威;毛一雷. 肝切除术围手术期管理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(3): 172 .
[8] 何敏;王坚. 肝门部胆管癌术前可切除性评估的方法与意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 419 .
[9] 刘树旺;张丽芬;刘利平等. 广东汉族人群HBV基因型、基本核心启动子/前C区突变与肝癌易感相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 444 .
[10] 唐银科;孙峰;刘士强等. 聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶注射填充术后并发症及处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 453 .