临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1082-1085.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.11.025

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

传统顺行置入载距突螺钉与逆行置入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折疗效对比分析

  

  1. 101300 北京顺义区医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-23 接受日期:2021-12-23 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-11-20

Comparative analysis of the effect of traditional anterograde and retrograde insertion of talar process screws for calcaneal fractures

  1. Department of Traumatic Orthopedics,Shunyi District Hospital,Beijing 101300, China
  • Received:2021-12-23 Accepted:2021-12-23 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-11-20

摘要: 目的 分析传统顺行植入载距突螺钉与逆行植入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折疗效。 方法 选取2019年3月~2021年1月我院80例跟骨骨折病人进行前瞻性研究。采用随机数字表法将入组对象分为对照组(采取传统方法顺行置入载距突螺钉)、试验组(采取逆行植入载距突螺钉),每组各40例。比较两组病人手术指标(手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间),术前和术后Bohler角、Gissane角,术后7天VAS评分、AOFAS评分、QOL评分及两组病人临床并发症发生率。 结果 对照组手术时间(103.52±12.50)分钟,高于试验组的(96.89±11.25)分钟;对照组术中出血量(79.58±9.13)ml,高于试验组的(60.25±8.71)ml;对照组骨折愈合时间(15.52±2.51)周,高于试验组的(11.47±2.03)周,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术后比较,试验组Bohler角(31.08±4.22)°和Gissane角(125.99±4.38)°,高于对照组的(25.74±3.07)°和(110.48±5.12)°,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 手术后比较,试验组QOL评分(80.04±5.29)分和AOFAS评分(82.55±7.46)分,高于对照组的(68.17±4.79)分、(64.03±6.14)分,试验组VAS评分(1.28±0.42)分,低于对照组(3.02±1.23)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组并发症发生率(7.50%)低于对照组(15.00%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 逆行置入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折,可改善骨折病情,减轻疼痛。

关键词: 逆行螺钉, 载距突, 跟骨骨折, 临床疗效, 生活质量

Abstract: Objective To analyze the curative effect of traditional and retrograde insertion of talar process screws for calcaneal fracture. Methods From March 2019 to January 2021,80 patients with calcaneal fracture in our hospital were selected for the study.According to the surgical methods of patients,the subjects were divided into control group(traditional method of anterograde insertion of talar protrusion screws) and experimental group(retrograde insertion of talar protrusion screws),with 40 cases in each group.Surgical indicators(operative time,intraoperative blood loss,fracture healing time),Preoperative and postoperative Bohler Angle,Gissane Angle,VAS score,AOFAS score,QOL score,and the incidence of clinical complications in 2 groups were compared. Results The operation time of the control group(103.52±12.50) minwas higher than that of the experimental group(96.89±11.25)min.The amount of intraoperative blood loss in control group(79.58±9.13)ml was higher than that in experimental group(60.25±8.71)ml.The fracture healing time of the control group(15.52±2.51) weeks was higher than that of the experimental group(11.47±2.03) weeks,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After operation,Bohler Angle(31.08±4.22)°and Gissane Angle(125.99±4.38)°in experimental group were higher than those in control group(25.74±3.07)° and(110.48±5.12)°,with statistical significance(P<0.05).After operation,QOL score(80.04±5.29) and AOFAS score(82.55±7.46) of experimental group were higher than those of control group(68.17±4.79) and(64.03±6.14),VAS score of experimental group(1.28±0.42) was lower than that of control group(3.02±1.23).The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in experimental group(7.50%) was lower than that in control group(15.00%),there was no statistical significance(P>0.05). Conclusion Retrograde insertion of talus process screws in the treatment of calcaneal fracture can significantly improve the condition of fracture,relieve pain,and improve the short-term quality of life of patients.

Key words: retrograde screw, focal distance processes, calcaneal fracture, clinical efficacy, the quality of life

[1] 徐江发 汤磊 崔英健 侯勇. 臀中肌内侧间隙入路人工全髋关节置换术的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 592-595.
[2] 王欢 王振宇 侯海涛 黄相鹏 付松 王亚楠 刘海军 王龙强 邵诗泽 黄奏琴. 经皮内镜与斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗外伤性Ⅰ、Ⅱ度腰椎滑脱的疗效观察 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 323-327.
[3] 汤月平 顾梅. 直接前入路与微创SuperPath入路对创伤性股骨颈骨折病人行全髋关节置换术的疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(3): 272-275.
[4] 邱欣国 崔喆. 轻量立体3D补片对腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝病人并发症、疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1068-1071.
[5] 陈辉海 薛双桃 赵广超 吴天亮 张俊德. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1073-1076.
[6] 李小川 黄春明 罗绍坚 范武 董智晖 蓝根 卢明南 林强祯 陆军海韦健 黎欲强 黄冀. 颈前路Hybrid术式治疗跳跃节段颈椎病的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 65-69.
[7] 辛国军 王建承 翁原驰 张俊. 全胰腺切除术9例临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 619-621.
[8] 沈柏儒, 宋长山, 吴旭辉等. 超声引导射频消融联合胸腔靶向灌注对肺癌恶性胸腔积液的疗效及生存质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(4): 363-366.
[9] 邱海军, 潘力生. 负压封闭引流技术联合自体游离皮片移植对下肢静脉性溃疡病人创面愈合及生活质量评分的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 188-190.
[10] 奉琴 刘玲 何其英 周艳 范冬萍. 互联网+自我管理模式对膀胱癌行回肠膀胱造口病人延续期生活质量的影响研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(10): 971-975.
[11] 路保赛, 尹跃伟, 张艳平等. 复方丹参片联合硫酸镁治疗附睾炎的疗效及对病人血清炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 575-577.
[12] 王序杰, 周岩冰. 机器人直肠癌手术现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 489-492.
[13] 陈亚东 还勇为 孙波 周大勇. 改良肠梗阻导管置入联合外科手术对急性左半结直肠恶性肠梗阻的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 276-278.
[14] 黄莹, 刘德云. 腹腔镜手术切除对巨大嗜铬细胞瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 168-170.
[15] 邹来宾 何天 陈亮 王健 马克强 曹天生. 腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗根部坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1147-1149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!