临床外科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 951-954.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10056483.2018.12.019

• • 上一篇    下一篇

微创单侧入路双侧减压固定与开放双侧减压固定治疗单间隙腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较

  

  1. 南京市江宁医院骨科
  • 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-20

Comparison of the curative effect of minimally invasive bilateral decompression fixation via unilateral approach and open bilateral decompression fixation in the treatment of single level lumbar spinal stenosis

  • Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-20

摘要: [摘要] 目的:比较微创单侧入路双侧减压固定与开放性双侧减压固定治疗单间隙腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。方法:单间隙腰椎管狭窄病人86例,按随机数字表法分为观察组、对照组两组,每组各43例,分别采用微创单侧入路双侧减压固定与开放性双侧减压固定治疗,比较两组手术及术后恢复情况及术后并发症发生率,采用改良Macnab标准评定手术效果。手术前后均采用疼痛视觉模拟评分表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数表(ODI)评定病人疼痛程度及腰椎功能改善情况,随访1年,测定术后不同时期病人椎间隙高度指数的变化。结果:观察组和对照组切口长度分别为(1.90±0.34)cm和(12.81±2.41)cm,术中出血量分别为(98.25±16.74)ml和(180.45±20.26)ml,术后下床活动时间及住院时间分别为(1.72±0.36)天、(6.32±1.07)天和(2.81±0.52)天、(8.90±0.96)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组、对照组术后并发症发生率分别为2.33%和9.30%,手术疗效分别为90.70%和86.05%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后1天、术后3个月VAS评分均降低,观察组和对照组术后1天评分分别为(3.04±1.26)分和(3.91±1.75)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后6个月、12个月ODI评分分别为(13.51±2.26)分和(10.79±3.52)分,对照组分别为(14.11±3.23)分和(10.94±2.47)分,与术前[观察组术前(32.14±5.15)分,对照组术前(33.31±4.98)分]比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组、对照组术后不同时间椎间隙高度指数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:微创单侧入路双侧减压固定术治疗单间隙腰椎管狭窄症疗效与开放性双侧减压固定术相当,但创伤小,疼痛轻,同时可缩短病人术后恢复时间,对病人远期脊柱稳定性影响小。

关键词: 腰椎管狭窄症, 单间隙, 单侧入路, 微创, 开放手术

Abstract: [Abstract]Objective:To compare the curative effect of minimally invasive bilateral decompression fixation via unilateral approach and open bilateral decompression fixation in the treatment of single level lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods:86 patients with single level lumbar spinal stenosis treated in our hospital during the period were selected as the subjects,and they were divided into the observation group and the control group with 43 cases in each group by the random number table method.The two groups were treated by minimally invasive bilateral decompression fixation via unilateral approach and open bilateral decompression fixation respectively.The situation of operation and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups,and the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was statistically analyzed.The operation effect was evaluated with modified Macnab criteria.The pain degree and improvement of lumbar function were evaluated by the visual analogue scale(VAS)and Oswestry disability index(ODI)before and after operation.A followup survey of 1 year was performed,and changes in intervertebral height index at different time after operation were determined.Results:The length of incision,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative ambulation time and hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter or less than those in the control group [(1.90±0.34)cm vs(12.81±2.41)cm,(98.25±16.74)ml vs(180.45±20.26)ml,(1.72±0.36)d and(6.32±1.07)d vs(2.81±0.52)d and(8.90±0.96)d ](P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications or the curative effect of operation between the observation group and the control group(2.33% vs 9.30%,90.70% vs 86.05%)(P>0.05).VAS scores of the two groups were decreased at 1 day and 3 months after operation,and the VAS score of observation group at 1 day after operation was lower than that of control group [(3.04±1.26)points vs(3.91±1.75)points](P<0.05).ODI scores of two groups were decreased at 6 months and 12 months after operation [(13.51±2.26)points and(10.79±3.52)points in the observation group,(14.11±3.23)points and(10.94±2.47 points)in the control group].Compared with those before operation [(32.14±5.15)points in the observation group,(33.31±4.98)points in the control group],there were statistically significant difference(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the intervertebral space height index between the observation group and the control group at different time after operation(P>0.05).Conclusion:The curative effect of minimally invasive bilateral decompression fixation via unilateral approach is similar to that of open bilateral decompression fixation in treatment of single level lumbar spinal stenosis.However,the trauma of the former is smaller and pain is milder,which can shorten the recovery time after operation,and it has little effect on the longterm stability of the spine.

Key words: lumbar spinal stenosissingle levelunilateral approach, minimally invasive, open operation

[1] 乔林 周玉萍 徐军鹏 陈波 殷杰 张欢 禹晓东. 微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 702-704.
[2] 赵悦 任海军. 不同时机微创颅内血肿穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、脑源性神经营养因子和同型半胱氨酸水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 689-692.
[3] 徐广春, 齐新生. 联合椎板间入路与后外侧入路内镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 946-950.
[4] 舒畅 李鑫. 主动脉弓部病变的微创化治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 807-809.
[5] 杜晓辉 何长征. 右半结肠癌微创治疗的术式选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 724-726.
[6] 赵文斌 凃峰 王浩 张晨. 肩胛下肌损伤的关节镜下治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 787-788.
[7] 汪忠镐 胡志伟. 血管外科疾病的腔内治疗进展——血管微创为必由之路 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 319-322.
[8] 王深明. 慢性原发性下肢静脉疾病微创治疗 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 335-337.
[9] 詹惟 李建波 夏强等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术治疗胸部疾病78例体会 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 385-386.
[10] 曾国华. 泌尿系疾病的微创治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(2): 73-75.
[11] 王子明 . 肾癌的微创治疗 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(2): 79-81.
[12] 李炯明 闫永吉 . 膀胱癌的微创治疗进展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(2): 82-85.
[13] 刘修恒 郭佳 . 前列腺癌的微创治疗 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(2): 86-88.
[14] 郑民华 马君俊. 微创技术推动现代外科发展的现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(1): 9-10.
[15] 江志伟 . 手术机器人系统在胃癌手术中应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(1): 14-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[4] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[5] 陈绍站;许勇;李婧;等. 防旋股骨近端髓内针与股骨近端解剖锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[6] 周观金;彭昊;陈森. 全膝关节置换治疗膝关节炎术后早期镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[7] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[8] 金鑫;周鹏;赵文超;等. 肾脏混合性上皮间质肿瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 785 .
[9] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[10] 曹志新. 基于膜解剖的胃癌D2手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 812 .