临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 600-602.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.07.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

微创经皮接骨板技术术中双反牵引复位在胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折中的应用效果分析

  

  1. 安徽省淮南市朝阳医院骨科
  • 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-20

Application effect of doublereverse traction reset and fixation with MiPPO for patients with comminuted fractures of middle and distal tibia

  • Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-20

摘要: 目的:探讨胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折病人经微创经皮接骨板技术(MIPPO)术中双反牵引复位的应用效果。方法:84例胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折病人随机分为观察组与对照组,每组42例。两组均实施MIPPO,观察组术中使用双反牵引复位,对照组常规复位内固定。比较两组围手术期情况,评价骨折复位情况、下肢功能、踝关节功能及骨折移位参数。结果:观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、有限切开率、术后负重时间、骨折愈合时间显著优于对照组(P<0.05),解剖复位效果优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组远折段内移外移长度和前后移长度、远折段内外翻角度、近端环左右和前后偏移量均明显降低(P<0.05),且均优于对照组(P<0.05)。术后3、6、12个月,观察组的JohnerWruhs和 AOFASAHS评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:MIPPO术中双反牵引复位治疗胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折复位满意,有利于骨折愈合及下肢功能康复。

关键词: 胫骨骨折, 粉碎性骨折, 微创经皮接骨板内固定, 双反牵引

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the application effect of doublereverse traction reset and fixation with MiPPO for patients with comminuted fractures of middle and distal tibia.Methods:84 patients with comminuted fractures of middle and distal tibia were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 42 cases in each group. Both groups underwent MIPPO,the observation group was treated with doublereverse traction reset and fixation,the control group was treated with conventional reset and fixation. The perioperative conditions were compared between the two groups,the eduction of fracture,the lower extremity function, ankle function and fracture displacement parameters were evaluated.Results:The operation time, intraoperative blood loss,limited incision rate , postoperative weightbearing time and fracture healing time were significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05),the reduction effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05).The length of the distal movement and distal segment, the inner and outer angle,left and right offset of the proximal ring, and the offset of the proximal ring were significantly reduction (P<0.05), which were better than the control group(P<0.05). At 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, the JohnerWruhs and AOFASAHS scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the observation and control group(P>0.05).Conclusion:Doublereverse traction reset and fixation with MiPPO for patients with comminuted fractures of middle and distal tibia can achieve satisfactory reduction, it is beneficial for fracture healing and rehabilitation of lower limb function.

Key words: tibia fracture, comminuted fractures, minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, doublereverse traction

[1] 郭乃铭, 罗筱玮, 彭俊, 徐海涛, 黄梦全, 李裕标. 分体式髌骨爪联合空心螺钉内固定治疗髌骨粉碎性骨折的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 158-159.
[2] 廖琦 刘世清 陈庆 贺斌. 外固定支架加植骨治疗胫骨骨折术后骨不连22例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(6): 428-428.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王毓锋;李涛;林锐等. 老年重症急性非结石性胆囊炎患者手术时机及方式的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(8): 599 .
[2] 杨宏达;刘志. TLR9-mRNA的表达与急性胰腺炎病人炎性因子变化的相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 923 .
[3] 宋立伟;李景春. 预防传统气管软化悬吊术并发症的两点改进[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 954 .
[4] 徐威;毛一雷. 肝切除术围手术期管理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(3): 172 .
[5] 党晓卫;付坤坤;李路豪. 门静脉高压症多学科协作模式构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(5): 327 .
[6] 谭锋维 薛奇 牟巨伟 高禹舜 毛友生 王大力 赵峻李宁 王镇 高树庚 赫捷. 从最新指南解读食管胃交界部腺癌的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 641 -643 .
[7] 林佩达 黄家麒 卢化祥 黄晟 刘光 杨广林 王福音 何冰冰 刘晓兵. 经皮机械性血栓清除术治疗创伤病人下肢深静脉血栓形成的安全性和早期疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 810 -813 .
[8] 徐迪 林强 袁冰 吴建伟 张中保 李雪萍. 围手术期康复临床路径在防治老年病人髋部骨折全髋关节成形术后静脉血栓栓塞的作用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 828 -830 .
[9] 胡军, 李绍员, 李包根, 罗俊峰. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾根部结扎与Hem-o-lok夹闭的对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 920 -921 .
[10] 彭华荣, 孙魁, 冯子驹. 经腹侧与经背侧超声定位在输尿管上段结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗中的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 126 -128 .