JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 846-851.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240792

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction model establishment for complete resolution of sentinel lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

  

  1. Department of Breast Diseases,the First Hospital of Lanzhou University,Gansu,Lanzhou 730000,China
  • Received:2024-05-24 Revised:2024-05-24 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-20

Abstract: Objective  To explore the factors associated with complete resolution of sentinel lymph node metastasis (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer and to establish a predictive model.Methods The medical records of 136 female patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from January 2022 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the 80/20 rule,the patients were randomly divided into a training set (108 cases) and a validation set (28 cases).Based on the pathological examination results of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients,they were classified into the sentinel lymph node pCR group and non-pCR group.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent risk factors of sentinel lymph nodes failing to reach pCR.Build a nomogram prediction model based on the screened risk factors.By drawing the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve calculation curve, the area under ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity are used to evaluate the discrimination of the model.Results Among the 108 breast cancer patients,46 cases achieved pCR in the sentinel lymph nodes,accounting for 42.59% (46 cases/108 cases).In addition,33 cases (30.56%) achieved pCR in the primary tumor lesion.The non-pCR group showed a higher proportion of stage Ⅲ clinical staging,lymph node short-axis reduction of less than 50% before and after treatment,tumor maximum diameter reduction of less than 50% before and after treatment,lymph node type Ⅲ classification,and blood flow grade Ⅲ compared to the pCR group (P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Clinical staging (OR=3.593,95%CI:1.276~10.121),lymph node short-axis reduction of less than 50% before and after treatment (OR=4.272,95%CI:1.517~12.032),tumor maximum diameter reduction of less than 50% before and after treatment (OR=3.710,95%CI:1.317~10.449),lymph node type (OR=3.827,95%CI:1.359~10.779),and blood flow grade (OR=4.764,95%CI:1.691~13.418) were identified as risk factors for not achieving pCR in the sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients (P<0.05).The sensitivity of the risk model for predicting non-achievement of pCR in the sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the training set of breast cancer patients was 0.826 (95%CI:0.705~0.943),with a specificity of 0.826 (95%CI:0.712~0.919) and an area under the ROC curve of 0.847 (95%CI:0.738~0.952).In the validation set,the sensitivity for predicting non~achievement of pCR in the sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients was 0.731 (95%CI:0.608~0.904),with a specificity of 0.827 (95%CI:0.713~0.941) and an area under the ROC curve of 0.834 (95%CI:0.729~0.951).Conclusion Clinical staging,changes in lymph node short-axis before and after treatment,changes in tumor maximum diameter before and after treatment,lymph node type,and blood flow grade are associated with pCR in the sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.Constructing a predictive model can help evaluate the pCR status of sentinel lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Key words: breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, sentinel lymph nodes, complete relief, prediction model

[1] XU Feng, ZHOU Xinqi, GAO Jianyang. Risk factors analysis and risk prediction model construction for postoperative urinary dysfunction in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(8): 813-817.
[2] TANG Wei, ZHANG Qian, LIU Lili. Effects of pecto-intercostal fascial block-PECS Ⅱ block-general anesthesia on hemodynamics and stress response in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(8): 879-883.
[3] NIE Lijing,GAN Lu,CHEN Yunyun,DONG Xiaojing,LI Shuai,MIAO Yiming,ZHANG Nan. Analysis of the status quo and influencing factors of compliance with prolonged endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(7): 717-.
[4] ZHU Xuran*,ZHANG Bolin,Yang Yanqi,Nuerbannu·Tabusibieke,SHAO Guoan,CHEN Shu. Analysis of factors affecting poor incision healing after breast cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(7): 722-.
[5] HUANG Xiaoke,TANG Qingfeng,LAI Weiqi,ZHU Jiang,ZHONG Yuanyou,HU Xiaobo,YANG Shiwei. Association between matrix GLA protein and influencing factors of idiopathic calcium oxalate stones and construction of a prediction model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(7): 757-.
[6] DING Zilin,LI Chenyuan,WANG Zhong,LI Zhiyu,SUN Shengrong. Escin promotes pyroptosis in breast cancer cells through ROS/Caspase-1/GSDMD signaling pathway [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 284-288.
[7] HU Di,SHEN Haoyuan. Value and mechanism of action of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR in early diagnosis of breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 329-331.
[8] YAN Pingping, ZHANG Shaodong, GUO Jiaoliang, DOU Yandong. Expression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis associated factor 1 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 in Luminal B breast cancer and their relationship with prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(1): 97-101.
[9] LIU Xiaoyan, TENG Sisi, CHEN Si, XU Hongmin, PENG Hui. Construction of risk prediction model for intraoperative stress injury in children with posterior scoliosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 878-881.
[10] HAN Ning, WANG Xiaodong, LI Yingchun, ZHOU Haihua, PAN Linlin, YU Chen. Influencing factors of poor anal function after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for extremely low rectal cancer and to construct a predictive model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 887-891.
[11] FENG Nan, LIN Hongqian, GUO Yijin, WANG Yajiao. Analysis of risk factors for prognosis in patients with esophageal signet ring cell carcinoma and construction of a nomogram prediction model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 712-715.
[12] WANG Yu, SHAO Bin, LIU Yang, WANG Song, ZHANG Jianguo. Current treatment status of HR + / HER 2-advanced breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 780-782.
[13] HUANG Jinxiang,MO Linjun,LIU Xiao. Construction and analysis of prediction model of postoperative poor anastomotic healing in colorectal patients based on LASSO variable selection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 621-625.
[14] ZHANG Wei,WEI Changhui,LU Junhao,PENG Chenjian,BAI Maosheng,WANG Jun. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative infection in traumatic tibial plateau fractures and constr uction of a Nomogram prediction model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 644-647.
[15] LIANG Shengkai,XIE Lei,LI Yao,LIU Jia,WANG Xin,LIU Guofeng,ZHANG Fengqi. The influencing factors of lower limb deep vein thrombosis after closed Pilon fracture surgery and the construction of risk prediction nomogram model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 653-656.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(7): 537 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(10): 781 -784 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(11): 823 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(2): 94 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(7): 516 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(8): 608 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(9): 693 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(1): 61 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 795 -796 .