JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 841-845.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20241167

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The influence of preoperative respiratory tract preparation and postoperative drainage volume on pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer

  

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,Hainan West Central Hospital,Danzhou 571700,China
  • Received:2024-07-15 Revised:2024-07-15 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-20

Abstract: Objective To explore the correlation between preoperative airway preparation and postoperative day 1 drainage volume in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy and the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.Methods Analyzing the clinical data of esophageal cancer 147 patients who underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic radical surgery from January 2022 to June 2024,they were divided into PPCs group and non-PPCs group based on whether PPCs occurred postoperatively.Clinical data of the two groups were compared.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to analyze the influencing factors for the occurrence of PPCs after radical resection of esophageal cancer,and a decision tree prediction model for postoperative PPCs was constructed.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to analyze the value of related factors in predicting the occurrence of PPCs after radical resection of esophageal cancer.Results Univariate analysis showed that age,albumin/fibrinogen ratio,neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio,preoperative respiratory preparation,and drainage volume on the first day after surgery were associated with the occurrence of PPCs after radical resection of esophageal cancer(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age,albumin/fibrinogen ratio and drainage volume on the first day after surgery were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of PPCs after radical resection of esophageal cancer(P<0.05).The decision tree model identified drainage volume on the first day after surgery,albumin/fibrinogen ratio,age and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as predictive factors.The incidence rate of PPCs in the group without preoperative respiratory preparation was significantly higher than that in the group with preoperative respiratory preparation (62.5% vs. 37.5%,P<0.05).A drainage volume of 246.59ml on the first day after surgery was the optimal cutoff value for predicting the occurrence of PPCs after radical resection of esophageal cancer,and specificity was 93.04%,sensitivity was 87.5%,area under ROC curve(AUC) was 0.958,95%CI was 0.911-0.984.Moreover,the incidence rate of PPCs in patients with a drainage volume≤246.59ml on the first day after surgery was significantly higher than that in patients with a drainage volume >246.59ml (77.78% vs.3.60%,P<0.01).Conclusion Preoperative airway preparation and postoperative drainage volume are closely related to the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after thoracoscopic radical surgery for esophageal cancer.Therefore,targeted measures should be taken for airway preparation before surgery,and changes in the patient's condition should be closely monitored after surgery to accurately determine the timing of drainage tube removal,which plays an important role in effectively preventing and treating PPCs.

Key words: esophageal cancer, pulmonary complications, thoracoscopic radical surgery, postoperative drainage volume, preoperative respiratory tract preparation

[1] WANG Jun, LV Xiazhi, TAO Yu, HU Chuanpeng. Value of serum miR-335-5p and ESM1 in early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of esophageal cancer patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(8): 836-840.
[2] ZHANG Zhi,ZHANG Qingqing,WEN Yanna,QU Shaolei. Distribution of pathogens and changes in serum HBD3 and Flt3L levels in patients with concurrent pulmonary infections after esophageal cancer radical surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(6): 602-606.
[3] YUN Yuhui, JI Xiang, HAN Guoliang, GUO Wei. The effect of different RLNLN dissection on the short-term efficacy,serum TREM-1,TRAP1 levels,and quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 482-485.
[4] YANG Sanhu, LI Yan, HUANG Lijun, YAN Zhenke, LIU Xu, LI Wanshan, JI Xiang . A random forest prediction study on the 3-year recurrence-free survival of early and middle stage esophageal cancer after total endoscopic resection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 486-492.
[5] LU Hai, FU Qin, ZHU Yunhe, ZHANG Xianzheng. Impacts of midazolam on the proliferation,migration,and invasion of esophageal cancer cells by regulating the CCL2-CCR2 signaling pathway [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 493-497.
[6] WANG Yifeng,HUA Rong,HE Yi. Influencing factors of postoperative complications of elderly patients with esophageal cancer with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥Ⅲ and construction of nomogram prediction model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 261-266.
[7] YUAN Hao, TENG Jingyan, ZHANG Qiang. Research progress of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(2): 210-212.
[8] KANG Shuhong, LYU Feng, NI Yunfeng, YUN Junru. Clinical value of miR-27a and miR-1299 in predicting  prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 803-806.
[9] WANG Jichao, XUE Junying, ZHANG Jianhua, YANG Jin, WANG Linpei. The effect of improved total cavity endoscopy on lung function,postoperative feeding and complications in patients with chronic lung disease of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 807-810.
[10] CHEN Hainan, LENG Xuefeng. Research Progress on Predictive Factors and Related Predictive Models for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophageal Cancer Surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 892-895.
[11] WANG Qing, CHEN Lili, LIU Yupeng. Establishment and application of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 716-720.
[12] LIU Shengkai,CUI Lina,LI Junpeng,SHI Junjie,FAN Yanling. Effect of surgical approach on complications and tumor marker levels in patients undergoing radical resection of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 603-606.
[13] HUANG Xiaomei,GUO Ming,LUO Junlong,BAO Chuan’en,HU Meng. Study on the relationship between serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-1 and esophagogastric anastomotic fistula in patients after thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(3): 276-280.
[14] ZHAO Tianhao, ZHAO Chun. Survival prognosis of multiple malignant tumors with secondary primary esophageal cancer:a population-based analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(2): 158-163.
[15] JIANG Fan, XIE Keqi. Impacts of butorphanol on the proliferation,apoptosis and migration of esophageal cancer cells by regulating CCL2-CCR2 axis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(2): 168-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 862 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 892 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 305 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 319 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(5): 359 -0 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(5): 384 -0 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(6): 453 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(7): 486 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(7): 537 .