JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 879-883.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240656

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of pecto-intercostal fascial block-PECS Ⅱ block-general anesthesia on hemodynamics and stress response in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer

  

  1. Anesthesiology Department of Rongchang District People's Hospital in Chongqing,Chongqing 402460,China
  • Received:2024-04-30 Revised:2024-04-30 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of pectointercostal fascial block(PIFB)PECSⅡ block-general anesthesia on hemodynamics and stress response in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Methods A total of 95 patients with breast cancer who underwent modified radical mastectomy in the hospital from November 2021 to November 2023 were enrolled in this study.They were divided into the control group (n=46) and the observation group (n=49) according to the anesthesia mode.The control group received PECS Ⅱ block general anesthesia and the observation group received PIFB-PECS Ⅱ block-general anesthesia.The dosage of remifentanil,the dosage of cisatracurium,recovery time,tracheal extubation time,postoperative analgesia pump compression times,VAS scores,hemodynamics (HR,MAP),oxidative stress response (SOD,CAT,MDA),and hyperthermia were compared between the two groups Susceptibility to MMSE score and adverse reactions.Results The dosage of remifentanil,dosage of cisatracurium,effective pressing times of analgesia pump within 48 h,wake-up time,tracheal extubation time and time to postoperative first pressing in the observation group were lower and shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05).The observation group had lower VAS scores than the control group after surgery (P<0.05).The HR of after anesthesia induction (T1),at tracheal intubation (T2),at the beginning of surgery (T3) and at the end of surgery (T4) in the observation group was (78.45±6.12) times /min,(100.28±11.54) times /min,(103.90±14.82) times /min and (93.66±9.17) times /min,respectively,which were lower than the control group [(84.66±7.04) times /min,(112.33±13.28) times /min,(122.44±17.06) times /min and (106.26±11.03) times /min,respectively].MAP of T1,T2,T3 and T4 in the observation group were (67.73±4.09) mmHg,(75.22±9.51) mmHg,(90.76±10.77) mmHg and (82.50±8.63) mmHg,respectively,the control groups were (70.10±5.66) mmHg, (82.62±10.17) mmHg, (96.43±12.59) mmHg and (90.82±11.04) mmHg,respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The levels of SOD, CAT and MDA in both groups at 24 hours and 72 hours after the operation were all higher than those before the operation (P<0.05).The SOD levels in the observation group were (83.22±15.44) nU/ml and (77.41±10.39) nU/ml at 24h and 72h after operation.It was lower than that of the control group, which was (90.40±18.23) nU/ml and (82.80±13.18) nU/ml.The CAT scores of observation group were (16.20±5.03) kU/L and (14.12±3.27) kU/L at 24h and 72h after operation,which were lower than those of control group [(20.75±6.57) kU/L and (17.06±4.35) kU/L].The MDA levels in the observation group were (5.12±1.33) mmol/L and (3.23±0.76) mmol/L at 24h and 72h after surgery,which were lower than those in the control group [(6.03±2.24) mmol/L and (4.88±1.05) mmol/L],and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).The MMSE scores of the observation group were (28.01±1.35) and (28.46±1.39),which were higher than those of the control group [(26.44±1.08) and (27.36±1.23)] (P<0.05).Conclusion Applying PIFB-PECS Ⅱ block-general anesthesia in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer can maintain hemodynamic stability,reduce oxidative stress and alleviate the damage to cognitive function,with high safety.

Key words: modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, pecto-intercostal fascial block, pectoral nerves Ⅱ block, general anesthesia, hemodynamics, stress response

[1] LI Shuping,WANG Lu,HU Shuna. Influence of general anesthesia induction with different doses of remimazolam on tracheal intubation stress response and hemodynamics in patients with radical resection of colon cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 306-309.
[2] GAO Tiemei,SHE Hantao,WU Bingqing. Effects of paravertebral nerve block under thoracoscopic direct vision on postoperative pain,stress response and T lymphocyte subsets in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 280-283.
[3] YANG Weiguang,WANG Haijing,MI Zhaotong,ZHANG Xinhua. Effects of intracavitary radiofrequency ablation combined with sclerotherapy injection on symptom improvement and lower limb hemodynamics in patients with lower limb varicose veins [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(12): 1320-1324.
[4] ZHOU Hongye, WANG Wei, ZHANG Hongbo. The research of risk factors of postoperative high activity delirium in elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma under general anesthesia [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(6): 539-544.
[5] WANG Jie, XU Aijun. Effect of General anesthesia combined with Caudal block on the prognosis of radical resection of Hirschsprung's disease [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(6): 518-520.
[6] HUANG Xianfeng, LIN Xiaoxiang, LI Jianxia.. Efficacy of early cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for patients with traumatic brain injury and cerebral hemodynamics changes [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(10): 919-924.
[7] LV Jing, HU Yichuan, YAO Shanglong.. Effects of different administration of dexmedetomidine combined with scalp nerve block on perioperative hemodynamics and stress response [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(12): 1074-1076.
[8] YIN Guojiang, LUO Zhongbing, LI Bixi, et al.. The application of bladder temperature and nasopharyngeal temperature monitoring in craniotomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(10): 853-855.
[9] JIANG Hui, ZHANG Xue, LI Shiyong, et al.. Diagnosis and treatment of negative pressure pulmonary edema(NPPE)during general anesthesia recovery period [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(11): 868-870.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!