临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 196-200.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250930

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中青年胆管结石病人行腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合的单中心回顾性分析

  

  1. 276800  山东日照,山东省日照市人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-22 接受日期:2025-09-22 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 崔周军,Email:cuizhoujun88@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2023QH018 )

A single-center retrospective analysis of laparoscopic common bile ductexploration and primary suture in young and middleaged patients with bile duct stones

  1. Department of General Surgery,Rizhao People's Hospital,Shandong,Rizhao 276800,China
  • Received:2025-09-22 Accepted:2025-09-22 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-02-25

摘要: 目的 比较肝外胆管结石中青年病人行腹腔镜辅助下胆总管探查(LCBDE)一期缝合术与腹腔镜辅助下胆总管探查T管引流术的临床疗效。方法 2021年1月~2024年12月收治的肝外胆管结石病人99例。根据治疗方法分为两组,观察组55例,LCBDE后给予一期缝合,对照组44例,LCBDE后给予T管引流。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流时间、术后生活自理能力评分、术后肠功能恢复时间、总住院费用、住院时间、肝功能指标、炎症指标变化、术后疼痛评分。结果 观察组病人性别(男/女)、年龄、结石数目、结石大小、胆总管内径分别为27/28例、(58.33±3.68)岁、(2.36±1.43)个、(0.79±0.38)cm和(1.17±0.31)cm,对照组分别为23/21例、(56.44±8.79)岁、(2.45±1.57)个、(0.88±0.54)cm和(1.29±0.38)cm,两组比较均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间、腹腔引流管放置时间和总费用分别为(125.10±36.27)分钟、(9.58±2.58)天、(5.22±1.47)天和(22167.39±3569.69)元,对照组分别为(161.45±37.24)分钟、(12.59±3.76)天、(6.79±2.55)天和(26479.88±5556.30)元,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组平均术后生活自理能力评分、平均术后疼痛评分和平均术后肠功能恢复时间分别为(1.89±0.88)分、(93.09±4.42)分和(2.98±0.82)天,对照组分别为(4.23±1.06)分、(82.50±9.97)分和(4.98±1.23)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前及术后3天肝功能指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 一期缝合术在中青年病人肝外胆管结石的治疗中展现了良好的临床效果。

关键词: 肝外胆管结石, 腹腔镜, 胆总管探查术, 一期缝合, T管引流, 中青年病人

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) one-stage suture and laparoscopic-assisted common bile duct exploration T-tube drainage in young and middle-aged patients with extrahepatic bile duct stones.Methods A total of 99 patients with extrahepatic bile duct stones were admitted from January 2021 to December 2024.According to the treatment methods,they were divided into two groups.There were 55 cases in the observation group,who were given primary suture after LCBDE,and 44 cases in the control group,who were given T-tube drainage after LCBDE.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage time,postoperative self-care ability score,postoperative intestinal function recovery time,total hospitalization cost,length of hospitalization,changes in liver function indexes,inflammatory indexes and postoperative pain score were compared between the two groups.Results The gender (male/female),age,number of stones,stone size and common bile duct inner diameter of the patients in the observation group were 27/28 cases,(58.33±3.68) years old,(2.36±1.43),(0.79±0.38) cm and (1.17±0.31) cm,respectively.The control groups were 23/21 cases,(56.44±8.79) years,(2.45±1.57) individuals,(0.88±0.54)cm and (1.29± <s:1> 0.38 cm)cm respectively.There was no statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05).The operation time,hospital stay,abdominal drainage tube placement time and total cost of the observation group were (125.10±36.27) minutes,(9.58±2.58) days,(5.22±1.47) days and (22167.39±3569.69) yuan,respectively.The control groups were (161.45±37.24) minutes,(12.59±3.76) days,(6.79±2.55) days and (26479.88±5556.30) yuan respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The average postoperative self care ability score,average postoperative pain score and average postoperative intestinal function recovery time of the observation group were (1.89±0.88) points,(93.09±4.42) points and (2.98±0.82) days respectively.The control groups were (4.23±1.06) points,(82.50±9.97) points and (4.98±1.23) days respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in liver function indicators between the two groups before and 3 days after the operation (P>0.05).Conclusion One-stage suture has shown good clinical results in the treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones in young and middle-aged patients.

Key words: extrahepatic bile duct stones, laparoscope, common bile duct exploration, primary suture, T-tube drainage, young and middle-aged patients

[1] 张肖. 高龄病人腹腔镜下腹股沟疝日间手术安全性及可行性探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(2): 161-163.
[2] 彭登发 王联钧 李虎清 蔡长松 张超 穆磊 王璋. 性别对腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术后肠道功能的影响:多中心倾向性评分匹配研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(2): 171-176.
[3] 郭治水 伍庄 徐涛 刘辉勇 杜恒. 机器人辅助腹腔镜和4K超清腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗局限性肾细胞癌的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(2): 214-217.
[4] 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 李延森, 何长征, 王振军, 韩加刚. 克氏针在单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 59-62.
[5] 刘杨旸, 刘少帅, 黄昱. 术前淋巴细胞、C反应蛋白及其比值对结直肠癌腹腔镜根治术后并发症的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 74-77.
[6] 朱红琼 兰勇 张晶 郭紫成. 达芬奇机器人辅助下不同入路腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中央型肾肿瘤对肾功能、肠道功能恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 988-991.
[7] 马连港 陈志雷 陆丹莹 李琳 朱静萱 马华崇 王振军 渠浩. 老年结直肠癌病人腹腔镜手术后延迟性肠麻痹的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 808-812.
[8] 徐锋 周心奇 高健扬. 腹腔镜直肠癌术后发生排尿功能障碍的危险因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 813-817.
[9] 邹裕海 刘雨 梁必雄. 术前呼吸道准备与术后引流量对食管癌胸腹腔镜根治术后肺部并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 841-845.
[10] 高鸿智 周博 王文斌. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜修补一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 894-894.
[11] 刘颜 尹韬远 田锐. 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除的临床实践:机遇、挑战与质量控制[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 677-.
[12] 李翔 周林秋 李珺 佘晶江 许剑 段建春 李玉文. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人术后胃肠功能影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 730-.
[13] 倪虎 吴向南 陶芸生 胡静. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后小剂量氢吗啡酮复合纳布啡自控静脉镇痛的效果及对疼痛介质释放的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 771-.
[14] 李文熙 郑鑫 孙宝信 张海生 朱志达 赵恩宏. 传统腹腔镜手术、经自然腔道取标本手术和经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(6): 632-636.
[15] 陈力 潘登 穆鑫 刘会锋 杨敏 王献良. 腹腔镜Soave术治疗年龄<6个月常见型先天性巨结肠的预后分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 478-481.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[4] 林俊. 原发性中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤供者在器官移植中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[5] 胡善彪;余少杰;彭龙开. 婴幼儿供肾移植[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[6] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[7] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[8] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[9] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[10] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .