临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 490-494.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20260371

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

达芬奇机器人辅助手术与传统开腹手术治胆道闭锁的疗效比较

  

  1. 430070  湖北武汉,武汉科技大学医学部武汉儿童医院研究生培养基地儿外科(游涛);华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院(武汉市妇幼保健院)普外科(闫学强)
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-29 接受日期:2026-03-29 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 闫学强,Email:pediatricsurgeon@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    儿童肝胆胰疾病临床研究室 (2025FEYJS005)

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of Da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery versus traditional open surgery in the treatment of biliary atresia

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery,Wuhan Children’s Hospital Graduate Joint Training Base,School of Medicine,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430070,China
  • Received:2026-03-29 Accepted:2026-03-29 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-05-20

摘要: 目的 比较达芬奇机器人辅助手术与传统开腹手术治疗胆道闭锁的围手术期及近期疗效。方法 2015年6月~2025年1月武汉儿童医院收治的胆道闭锁患儿46例,患儿均行Kasai手术。根据手术方式分为达芬奇机器人辅助手术(robotic-assisted kasai portoenterostomy,RAKPE)组和传统开腹手术(open kasai portoenterostomy,OKPE)组。比较两组一般资料、患儿术前、术后出院前及术后6个月肝功能指标、术后住院时间及退黄率。结果 术后6个月复查时,RAKPE组的总胆红素与直接胆红素中位数分别为22.3 (15.0,116.8)μmol/L和11.8 (4.7,88.4)μmol/L,OKPE组分别为34.5 (20.0,107.0)μmol/L和15.5 (9.0,61.0)μmol/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RAKPE组退黄率为40.0%(8/20),OKPE组24例(2例失访)中7例退黄,退黄率29.2%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。RAKPE组的术后住院时间为13.0 (11.0,15.0) 天,OKPE组为15.0 (13.0,18.0) 天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 机器人手术能够辅助完成胆道闭锁的一期微创根治,与传统开腹手术相比,其在降低术后6个月胆红素水平、缩短术后住院时间方面显示出优势。机器人手术系统在小儿胆道闭锁手术中安全、可行,但操作难度大,大范围推广尚需进一步多中心验证。

关键词: 胆道闭锁, 机器人手术, 腹腔开放手术

Abstract: Objective To compare the perioperative and short-term outcomes of Da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery and traditional open surgery in the treatment of children with biliary atresia (BA).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 46 children with biliary atresia admitted to Wuhan Children's Hospital from June 2015 to January 2025.All children underwent Kasai portoenterostom.Based on the surgical approach,they were divided into a Da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery group (Robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy,RAKPE) and a traditional open surgery group (Open Kasai portoenterostomy,OKPE).The perioperative data,liver function indicators,and jaundice clearance rates at 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups.Results At the 6-month postoperative follow-up,the median values of total bilirubin and direct bilirubin in the RAKPE group were 22.3 (15.0,116.8)μmol/L and 11.8 (4.7,88.4)μmol/L,respectively.The OKPE groups were 34.5 (20.0,107.0)μmol/L and 15.5 (9.0,61.0)μmol/L respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The jaundice regression rate was 40.0% (8/20) in the RAKPE group.Among the 24 cases (2 lost to follow-up) in the OKPE group,7 cases had jaundice regression,with a jaundice regression rate of 29.2%.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The postoperative hospital stay in the RAKPE group was 13.0 (11.0,15.0) days,and that in the OKPE group was 15.0 (13.0,18.0) days.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01).The jaundice clearance rate (defined as serum total bilirubin ≤ 20 μmol/L) was 40.0% (8/20) in the RAKPE group and 29.2% (7/24,with 2 cases lost to follow-up) in the OKPE group,showing no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).The median postoperative hospital stay in the RAKPE group [13.0 (11.0,15.0) days] was significantly shorter than that in the OKPE group [15.0 (13.0,18.0) days] (P<0.01).Conclusion Robotic-assisted surgery can successfully achieve one-stage minimally invasive radical treatment for biliary atresia.Compared with traditional open surgery,it demonstrates advantages in terms of reducing bilirubin levels at 6 months postoperatively and shortening the length of postoperative hospital stay.The robotic surgical system is safe and feasible for complex pediatric hepatobiliary reconstructive surgery.However,the procedure is technically demanding,and widespread adoption requires further validation through multicenter studies.

Key words: biliary atresia, robotic surgical procedures, open abdomen techniques

[1] 宋洋 张镔 杨继鑫. 从诊断、手术到并发症:胆道闭锁全病程管理的挑战与展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(5): 481-485.
[2] 张志波. 胆道闭锁术后胆汁湖的处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(5): 486-489.
[3] 黄乐怡 彭宇明 尹强. 胆道闭锁患儿肝移植术后门静脉狭窄的危险因素分析及防治策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(5): 495-498.
[4] 张焱然, 刘嘉颖, 孟雨, 杨千慧, 李腾飞, 葛亮, 詹江华. 胆道闭锁诊断与治疗指南(2025年)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 16-21.
[5] 宋洋, 杨继鑫. 《胆道闭锁诊断与治疗循证实践指南》更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 43-45.
[6] 叶善平 吴灿 李太原. 机器人手术系统右半结肠切除经自然腔道取标本机器人手术系统方式选择与质量控制[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 463-465.
[7] 唐凌 毛永忠 江凌 普佳睿 杨德华 汤绍涛. 机器人辅助左半结肠切除、Soave吻合术治疗儿童巨结肠同源病[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 537-540.
[8] 肖必栋 孙润物 付康 鲁巍. 达芬奇机器人手术治疗小儿环状胰腺的初步经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 89-91.
[9] 张越 王福强 张学锋 范江 王允 李勇. 复杂纵隔肿瘤的微创治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 610-613.
[10] 王世丽 吴谋东 安妮妮 马洪. 机器人在小儿泌尿疾病中的应用现状与展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 407-410.
[11] 黄光彬 李庚 高贺云 郭云凯 余山桢 胡涛 杜国伟 向梦 宋学敏 杨琨 张文. 单孔机器人技术在婴幼儿泌尿系手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 419-422.
[12] 詹江华, 徐晓丹. 胆道闭锁伴发巨细胞病毒感染的诊治现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 504-507.
[13] 隋金珂 张卫. 腹腔镜结直肠手术的现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 492-494.
[14] 马鑫, 宣云东, 黄庆波, 张旭. 肾癌合并下腔静脉癌栓的机器人手术策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 104-107.
[15] 袁野 金润森 李鹤成. 机器人手术在肺癌外科的现状和展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 601-604.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 彭银杰 李印 陈威鹏 凃成志 袁俊 马海波 秦建军. 老年cT1N0M0食管癌病人内镜和手术治疗预后分析:基于SEER数据库[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 651 -656 .
[2] 冯锦腾 范坤 张广健 付军科 高蕊. 食管异物202例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 683 -685 .
[3] 梁涵, 王彦峰. 供肾常温机械灌注的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 985 -987 .
[4] 陈沛锐, 卿秋杉, 车国卫等. 术前胸中上段食管癌颈部淋巴结转移相关因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 566 -569 .
[5] 陈访, 王立春. 脊髓内结核球瘤的诊疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 916 -918 .
[6] 闫瑞承, 李士军, 王旭峰, 罗建飞. 腹腔镜下右半结肠癌根治术后胃肠功能障碍的高危因素分析及预测模型的建立[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 957 -959 .
[7] 查正彪, 潘友民, 郑智等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后急性肾功能损伤危险因素分析及预后[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 467 -470 .
[8] 李永康, 王南鹏, 杨能红. 左颈清术后合并双侧乳糜胸及肺炎一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 598 .
[9] 张江川 张春梅. 右美托咪定在侧卧位静脉麻醉下混合痔切除术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 690 -692 .
[10] 战激光, 张想旺 . 回收窗口期发生下腔静脉滤器血栓形成的腔内治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1075 -1077 .