临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 503-506.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20241463

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

重症监护室危重病人早期发生急性胃肠损伤的危险因素分析

  

  1. 241000  华东师范大学附属芜湖医院急诊重症监护室
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-03 接受日期:2024-09-03 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 张晓敏,Email:13470735789@163.com

Analysis of risk factors for early acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit

  1. Emergency Intensive Care Unit of Wuhu Hospital Affiliated to East China Normal University,Wuhu,Anhui,241000,China
  • Received:2024-09-03 Accepted:2024-09-03 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-20

摘要: 目的 探讨重症监护室危重病人早期发生急性胃肠损伤的危险因素。方法 2021年1月~2023年7月收治的病人中APACHE Ⅱ评分≥15分的重症病人80例,根据入院1周内是否发生胃肠损伤,分为急性胃肠损伤组(观察组,40例)及未发生胃肠损伤组(对照组,40例),对两组病人各项临床资料进行单因素分析,将单因素分析有意义的指标作为自变量,纳入Logistic回归分析,进一步筛选引起早期重症病人发生胃肠损伤的危险因素,并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)评估危险因素预测价值。结果 观察组中性粒细胞值/淋巴细胞值(NLR)、乳酸、白蛋白、血管活性药物应用时间分别为(14.05±4.52)、(6.94±1.66)mmol/L、(24.49±2.73)g/L、63(0,93.5)h,对照组分别为(8.78±3.74)、(4.06±1.30)mmol/L、(26.89±2.90)g/L、0(0,43)小时,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,NLR(OR=1.36,95%CI 1.18~1.57,P<0.001)、乳酸(OR=18.54,95%CI 3.28~104.73,P=0.001)、血管活性药物应用时间(OR=1.03,95%CI 1.01~1.04,P<0.001),是危重病人早期发生急性胃肠损伤的危险因素;白蛋白是危重病人早期发生急性胃肠损伤保护因素(OR=0.74,95%CI 0.63~0.88,P=0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示,NLR、乳酸、血管活性药物应用时间AUC(95%CI)分别为0.800(0.707~0.894)、0.969(0.940~0.999)、0.716(0.600~0.831);灵敏度分别为65%、85%、55%;特异度分别为80%、95%、88%;差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 NLR、乳酸、血管活性药物应用时间是重症监护室危重病人早期发生急性胃肠损伤的危险因素,联合这些指标对判断早期发生急性胃肠损伤具有较高预测价值。

关键词: 危重症, 急性胃肠损伤, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influencing  factors for early acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit.Methods Among the patients admitted from January 2021 to July 2023,there were 80 critically ill patients with an APACHE Ⅱ score of ≥15 points.Based on whether gastrointestinal injury occurred within one week of admission,they were divided into an acute gastrointestinal injury group (observation group,40 cases) and a control group of 40 cases randomly selected from cases without gastrointestinal injury.Univariate analysis was conducted on various clinical data of the two groups of patients,and the meaningful indicators of univariate analysis were included as independent variables in logistic regression analysis to further screen for risk factors causing gastrointestinal injury in early severe patients.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was drawn to further evaluate the predictive value of risk factors.Results The results of univariate analysis showed that the observation group had neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR),lactate,albumin,and application time of vasoactive drugs (h) of 14.05±4.52,(6.94±1.66)mmol/L,(24.49±2.73)g/L,and 63 (0,93.5)h,respectively,while the control group had neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR),lactate,albumin,and vasoactive drug application time (h) of 8.78±3.74,(4.06±1.30)mmol/L,(26.89±2.90)g/L,and 0 (0,43)h,respectively.The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).The results of logistic regression analysis showed that NLR (OR=1.36,95%CI1.18-1.57,P<0.001),lactate (OR=18.54,95%CI 3.28-104.73,P=0.001),and application time of vasoactive drugs (h) (OR=1.03,95%CI 1.01-1.04,P<0.001) all had statistical significance and were risk factors for early acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients;The variable albumin is a protective factor for early acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients,but it has statistical significance (OR=0.74,95%CI 0.63-0.88,P=0.001).ROC curve analysis showed that NLR,lactate,and application time of vasoactive drugs(h) AUC (95%CI) were 0.800 (0.707-0.894),0.969 (0.940-0.999),and 0.716 (0.600-0.831),respectively;The sensitivities were 65%,85%,and 55%,respectively;and the specificities were 80%,95%,and 88%,respectively;the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion NLR,lactate,and application time of vasoactive drugs(h) are the risk factors for early acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit,and have high predictive value.

Key words: critical illness, acute gastrointestinal injury, risk factors

[1] 刘天鹏 陆世心 孟宪志. 无症状胆囊结石继发胆总管结石的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 507-510.
[2] 王刚 拜夏睿 梁姣 南李刚. 颅脑损伤病人胃肠功能障碍的临床危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 511-513.
[3] 王维 潘帆帆 潘春生. 结肠息肉切除术后病人延迟性出血的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 514-518.
[4] 张林浩 向玉萍 罗天会 曾玲. 成人体外循环下心血管术后重度低氧血症现状及影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 822-825.
[5] 冯南 林鸿千 郭义锦 王亚娇. 食管印戒细胞癌病人预后不良危险因素分析及列线图预测模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 712-715.
[6] 王青 陈丽丽 刘郁鹏. 食管癌术后颈部吻合口漏列线图风险预测模型的建立和应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 716-720.
[7] 孟令胜 孔德华 王见斌. 床旁胃肠超声指导ICU急性胃肠损伤危重患者肠内营养治疗的应用价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 729-732.
[8] 梁胜凯 谢磊 李瑶 刘佳 王欣 刘国峰 张奉琪. 闭合性Pilon骨折术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的影响因素及其风险预测列线图模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 653-656.
[9] 严昌林 孙兴伟 赵璐. 个体化预测肛周脓肿切开引流术后肛瘘发生的列线图模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 517-520.
[10] 朱潼洲 孙强 邵倩 王倩. 胫骨平台骨折关节镜下微创经皮钢板内固定治疗术后膝关节僵硬的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(4): 350-353.
[11] 向悦 陈德杰. 甲状腺乳头状癌术后颈侧区复发影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 248-251.
[12] 蒋智洋 灿海乐 汤雅芬 李晓刚 廖晓锋. 胆囊癌病人预后动态列线图的构建及验证[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 182-187.
[13] 邓亦奇 邹士东 张庆宇 汪明星. 术后体重增加与经椎间孔腰椎融合术后复发性腰痛的相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(11): 1191-1194.
[14] 季凤俊 刘伟 景仕银 吴斌 杨长刚. 非小细胞肺癌病人腔镜术后心脏并发症发生的影响因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(10): 1040-1043.
[15] 周义青 孙小虎. 三镜联合胆总管切开取石一期缝合治疗胆总管结石术后发生胆漏的危险因素分析及防治对策探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 576-579.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[2] 周观金;彭昊;陈森. 全膝关节置换治疗膝关节炎术后早期镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[3] 陈凛;崔建新. 胃癌术后复发与再手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 813 .
[4] 杨钦;张再重;王烈. 空肠间置术在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 816 .
[5] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[6] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[7] 曹志新. 基于膜解剖的胃癌D2手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 812 .
[8] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[9] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[10] 吴强;王欣;张慧俊. 七例手部肿瘤误诊分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 922 .