临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 864-866.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.09.021

• • 上一篇    下一篇

食管癌根除术后合并吻合口漏的影响因素分析

  

  1. 830011 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院胸外科
  • 出版日期:2020-09-20 发布日期:2020-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 罗洞波,Email:13999891258@139.com
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2017D01C388)

Analysis of the influencing factors of anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer eradication

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,Affiliated cancer hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Xinjiang,Wulumuqi 830011,China
  • Online:2020-09-20 Published:2020-09-20

摘要: 目的 分析食管癌根除术后合并吻合口漏的影响因素。
方法 2016年12月~2018年12月收治的食管癌根治术病人300例,根据是否发生术后吻合口漏分为吻合口漏组(84例)和无吻合口漏组(216例),采用单因素和Logistic回归法分析影响食管癌根除术后发生吻合口漏的因素。
结果 单因素分析显示,发生吻合口漏的主要影响因素包括手术方式、吻合口位置、术前放化疗、术前血清白蛋白水平、合并呼吸系统疾病和手术时间。Logistic回归分析显示,手术方式、吻合口位置、术前放化疗、合并呼吸系统疾病、手术时间和血清白蛋白水平是引起食管癌根治术后吻合口漏的独立风险因素。
结论 引起食管癌根治术后吻合口漏的风险因素较多,应针对这些独立风险因素制定有效的预防处理对策。

关键词: 食管癌, 根治术, 吻合口漏, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective To explore and analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer eradication.
Methods According to the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage,300 patients underwent esophagectomy in our hospital from December 2016 to December 2018 were divided into anastomotic leakage group (84 cases) and non-anastomotic leakage group (216 cases).Univariate analysis,and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer eradication.
Results Univariate analysis showed that the main influencing factors of anastomotic leakage included operation mode,anastomotic position,preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy,serum albumin level,respiratory diseases and operation time.Logistic regression analysis showed that operation mode,anastomotic position,preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy,combined with respiratory diseases,operation time and albumin level were independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.
Conclusion There are many risk factors of anastomotic leakage after radical resection of esophageal cancer.Therefore,effective prevention and treatment measures should be made according to these independent risk factors.

Key words: esophageal cancer, radical operation, anastomotic leakage, risk factors

[1] 杨福刚 胡双 马超 徐成仕 水华 李志强. 非创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血病人住院病死相关危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 832-836.
[2] 陈勇军. 腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治术的现状和争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 719-721.
[3] 夏漫辉 冷云华 季灿平 丁学武 陈佳杰. 胸腔镜食管癌切除联合左侧颈部吻合治疗食管癌的疗效及其对呼吸功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 760-763.
[4] 徐冉 杨年钊 赵海远 李阳 赵军 张义胜. 多灶性胃癌病人淋巴结转移危险因素及预后分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 774-777.
[5] 袁俊 李印 彭银杰 凃成志 陈威鹏 秦建军. 术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对淋巴结转移的胸段食管鳞癌病人预后的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 627-630.
[6] 江万里 曾文慧 王新 宋恒雅 杨森 黄杰 谢颂平. 食管癌术后再发胸胃癌的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 631-633.
[7] 续文栋 张鹏(小) 吕朋 郑锴 田彦超 张鹏. 亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶基因多态性与食管癌易感性关系的Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 634-638.
[8] 李剑 童希文 汪坤 廖进勇. 胸腹腔镜下胸内吻合术与颈部吻合术治疗胸中下段食管癌的近期疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 639-642.
[9] 毛兴波 魏一儒 庄丽萍 邬长康. 胃癌根治术后延迟性肠麻痹发生风险的简易预测评分系统构建与初步验证[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 654-657.
[10] 李安 秦大磊. 左胸单切口与右胸腹双切口在胸中下段食管癌手术中的应用比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 693-695.
[11] 甄庆强, 陈克军, 赵志强等. 影响糖尿病下肢溃疡愈合的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 518-821.
[12] 王功锦, 黄杰. 可降解材料聚乙醇酸垫片在全腔镜食管癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 548-550.
[13] 秦龙, 李婷. 肝脏悬吊技术在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 557-559.
[14] 李静, 孙冬弢. 重度颅脑损伤病人颅内血肿清除术后急性肾功能不全的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 581-583.
[15] 严会志 张军 林称意 程栋梁 郭家龙. 食管癌手术中采用左颈部T形全机械侧侧吻合术吻合对相关手术并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 338-340.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!