临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 266-269.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.03.021

• • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜辅助手术与后矢状入路手术治疗中高位一穴肛畸形的疗效比较

  

  1. 100020 北京,首都儿科研究所附属儿童医院普通(新生儿)外科(任相海、刁美、徐航、李旭、李龙);北京协和医学院研究生院(任相海,李龙);武汉大学基础医学院(江琪)
  • 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 李龙,Email:lilong23@126.com
  • 作者简介:任相海与江琪为共同第一作者

Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high- and intermediate-type Persistent Cloaca

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China
  • Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-03-20

摘要: 目的 纵向比较腹腔镜辅助肛门成形术(LAARP)与后矢状入路肛门成形术(PSARP)加泄殖腔整体游离术(TUM)治疗中高位一穴肛畸形的疗效。 方法 2005年11月~2016年3月我院收治的中高位一穴肛畸形患儿25例(LAARP组),接受LAARP术治疗;1999年3月~2004年5月收治的中高位一穴肛患儿9例(PSARP组),行PSARP加TUM治疗。比较两组患儿术中情况、术后并发症及肛门功能。 结果 两组患儿手术年龄、共同管长度、骶骨指数、合并畸形等基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。LAARP组和PSARP组手术时间分别为(124.32±8.74)分钟和(186.67±65.53)分钟,术中出血量分别为(15.84±9.80)ml 和(42.78±24.25)ml,术后住院时间分别为(6.32±1.11)天和(10.11±1.90)天,总并发症发生率分别为16.0%和 66.7%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义P<0.05。LAARP组排便功能评分为(10.39±1.50)分,PSARP组为(8.89±1.54)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LAARP组患儿的便秘评分值要优于PSARP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患儿的自主排便运动和污粪等评分值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 与PSARP术配合TUM术相比,LAARP术治疗中高位一穴肛疗效可靠,创伤小、术后恢复快。

关键词: 一穴肛畸形, 肛门成形术, 腹腔镜, 排便功能

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy of Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty(PSARP) with Total urogenital mobilization(TUM) for high- and intermediate-type Persistent Cloaca(PC) by vertical comparison. Methods Twenty-five girls with high- and intermediate-type PC who underwent LAARP between November 2005 and March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of 9 girls with high- and intermediate-type PC who underwent PSARP plus TUM between March 1999 and May 2004 were collected as control. The duration of operation, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complications and anal function (Krickenbeck classifiction) were compared between groups. Results The 2 groups were comparable in baseline data.LAARP group presented shorter operative time[(124.32±8.74)min vs. (186.67±65.53)min,P<0.05], less estimated blood loss [(15.84±9.80)ml vs.(42.78±24.25)ml,P<0.05],shorted postoperative hospital stay[(6.32±1.11)d vs. (10.11±1.90)d,P<0.05] and lower morbidity of postoperative complication[ 16.0%(4/25) vs.66.7%(6/9),P<0.05] when compared with PSARP group. According to Krickenbeck classification, the overall bowel function score of LAARP group was better than that of PSARP group[(10.39±1.50) vs. (8.89±1.54),P<0.05] ,children in LAARP group had better constipation score than those in PSARP group(P<0.05), however, the rates of voluntary bowel movement and soiling were similar in two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with PSARP combined with TUM, LAARP is safe effective in the treatment of high- and intermediate-type PC. Meanwhile, LAARP technique can acquire some advantages such as less traumatic, better cosmetic results and faster recovery; it seems to be more suitable for the treatment of children with high- and intermediate-type PC.

Key words: persistent cloaca, anorectoplasty, laparoscopy, defecation function

[1] 黄莹, 刘德云. 腹腔镜手术切除对巨大嗜铬细胞瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 168-170.
[2] 曾国祥, 黄修仿 . 腹腔镜微创根治术联合术中腹腔热灌注化疗对老年大肠癌病人血清TGF-β1及Periostin水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 177-179.
[3] 王波:彭美红:江海等. 腹腔镜治疗成人Morgagni疝致肠梗阻一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 756-757.
[4] 徐延昭, 张缜, 郭强等. 早期肠内免疫营养在全腔镜食管癌根治术后老年病人中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 773-776.
[5] 张鹏, 黄东, 刘全. 肠系膜下动脉高位与低位结扎合并根部淋巴结清扫在腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术中的近期疗效对比[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 783-786.
[6] 池风旭, 朴大勋. 腹腔镜左半结肠癌根治术现状及进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 822-824.
[7] 李伟, 辛国军. 选择性Ⅰ期腹腔镜胆囊切除联合内镜逆行胆胰管造影在老年胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 661-663.
[8] 杜京丽, 郭庆森, 郑茂煌, 刘益峰, 吴德柱. 微创胆总管切开取石不同手术方式的疗效对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 664-667.
[9] 许巧巧, 代金贞. 腹腔镜胰腺切除术中并发甲亢一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 692-693.
[10] 卢远响, 陶连元, 马家豪, 肖二卫, 李德宇. 吲哚菁绿荧光融合影像技术在腹腔镜肝癌切除中的应用及展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 718-720.
[11] 于朋涛, 孙海军, 李之拓, 王鹏飞, 白晓东. Mirizzi综合征的诊治进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 721-723.
[12] 王校媛, 张金峰, 杨英男等. 食管癌胸腹腔镜下胸内吻合的技术浅谈[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 549-552.
[13] 马双阳, 戴兵, 刘驰等. 腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 592-594.
[14] 吴奔, 杨凯, 朱劲松等. 末端可弯输尿管镜在嵌顿性输尿管上段结石治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 606-608.
[15] 万成亮, 海波, 白强等. 小儿肠套叠经腹腔镜下空气灌肠辅助复位与开腹手术复位的临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 608-609.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 钦传辉, 杨贵义, 刘华, 黄毅, 赵启生, 钱群. 腹腔镜下保留直肠上动脉的D3淋巴结廓清术在乙状结肠癌根治术中的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 66 -68 .
[2] 李智, 吴海辉, 王德国. 经椎间孔椎体间融合术与后路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 73 -77 .
[3] 田文. 甲状腺癌诊治之中国经验与未来走向[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 201 -204 .
[4] 刘文胜. 复发性分化型甲状腺癌的诊治思路与规范[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 205 -207 .
[5] 李朋, 韦伟. 原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进诊治的难点与进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 208 -210 .
[6] 李秋梨, 张诠. 侵犯上呼吸消化道分化型甲状腺癌的外科处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 211 -214 .
[7] 鲁瑶, 孙小亮, 张凌. 继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的手术指征与治疗难点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 214 -216 .
[8] 赵诣深, 赵紫涵, 孙辉. 甲状腺术中神经监测技术的沿革、创新与规范[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 217 -220 .
[9] 刘永琛, 宋牧野, 吴泽宇. 微创介入治疗在甲状腺疾病中的应用与争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 221 -223 .
[10] 王松, 谢秋萍, 王平. 全腔镜甲状腺手术热点与难点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 224 -226 .