临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 66-68.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.01.020

• • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜下保留直肠上动脉的D3淋巴结廓清术在乙状结肠癌根治术中的临床应用

  

  1. 441300 湖北省随州市中心医院,湖北医药学院附属随州医院普外三科(钦传辉、杨贵义、刘华、黄毅、赵启生);武汉大学中南医院结直肠肛门外科(钱群)
  • 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨贵义,Email:qinchuanhui2007@hotmail.com

Clinical application in laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of superior rectal artery

  1. Department of Anorectal Surgery,Suizhou Hospital,Hubei Medical University,Suizhou 441300,China
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-01-20

摘要: 目的 探讨腹腔镜下保留直肠上动脉(SRA)的 D3淋巴结廓清术在乙状结肠癌根治术中应用的临床可行性、安全性及有效性。方法 2016年1月 ~2018年12月间收治的乙状结肠癌病人45例,根据治疗方法不同分为两组,保留SRA组25例,采用腹腔镜下保留SRA的D3淋巴结廓清术,不保留SRA组20例,行直接离断肠系膜下动脉根部不保留直肠上动脉手术。比较两组术中出血量、手术时间、肠道功能恢复以及术后并发症等指标。结果 保留SRA组和不保留SRA手术组手术时间分别为(202.2±46.5)分钟和(147.5±37.3)分钟,术后肠道功能恢复时间分别为(2.1±1.1)天和(3.1±1.3)天,住院时间分别(8.1±0.9)天和(11.5±1.1)天,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);保留SRA组和不保留SRA手术组术中出血量分别为(65.3±10.2)ml和(59.2±9.9)ml,淋巴结清扫数量分别为(14.4±3.5)枚和(15.3± 4.2)枚,术后并发症发生率分别为8%(2/25)和15%(3/20),两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 腹腔镜下乙状结肠癌根治术保留直肠上动脉的 D3淋巴结廓清术安全可行,未增加并发症发生率,有助于术后肠功能恢复。

关键词: 乙状结肠癌, 直肠上动脉, 淋巴结廓清术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of superior rectal artery.Methods Laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection of superior rectal artery was performed in 25 cases and direct dissection of inferior mesenteric artery without preservation of superior rectal artery in 20 cases at the same time.The clinicopathological data,operative time,intestinal function recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time in SRA group and non-SRA group was(202.2±46.50)min and(147.5±37.3)min,and the recovery time of intestinal function was(2.1±1.1)days and(3.1 ±1.3)days,The hospitalization time was(8.1±0.9)days and(11.5±1.1)days,there were significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).The intraoperative bleeding volume in the SRA-sparing group and the non-SRA-sparing group was(65.3 ±10.2)ml and(59.2±9.9)ml,The number of lymph node dissectionwas(14.4±3.5)and(15.3±4.2),and the incidence of postoperative complications was 8%(2/25)and 15%(3/20),there were no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions The laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection  with preservation of superior rectal artery for sigmoid cancer is safe and feasible,the patients can recover early,and without increasing complication incidence,Thus  has great clinical value.

Key words: sigmoid cancer, superior rectal artery, lymph node dissection

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈琳, 董汉华, 程琪, 龙新, 陈孝平. 胰十二指肠切除标准化流程——同济经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 5 -7 .
[2] 张涛, 孙备. 2019年NCCN胰腺癌临床实践指南(V2 版)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 8 -11 .
[3] 唐健雄, 李航宇. 老年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 12 -15 .
[4] 王文强, 张二雷, 项帅, 董汉华, 龙新, 古今, 李剑, 黄志勇. 动脉优先持续阻断技术:巨大肝血管瘤切除的新策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 16 -18 .
[5] 荚卫东, 刘文斌. 《肝血管瘤诊断和治疗多学科专家共识(2019 版)》解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 19 -22 .
[6] 陈志宇, 别平. 肝胆管结石病胆肠吻合术应用专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 23 -26 .
[7] 林锦娜, 刘强. 2019年NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南更新解读:乳腺癌局部治疗新进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 27 -30 .
[8] 韦伟, 李朋. 2019年第一版NCCN甲状腺恶性肿瘤治疗指南解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 31 -34 .
[9] 张仁泉, 康宁, 宁郑浩. 《机器人辅助食管切除术中国临床专家建议(2019版)》解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 35 -37 .
[10] 梁寒. 胃癌肝转移诊断与综合治疗中国专家共识解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 38 -40 .