JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 427-431.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250655

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The efficacy of taTME combined with modified Bacon procedure and taTME one-stage anastomosis in the treatment of low rectal cancer

LUO Bingqing,WANG Zhili,WANG Xuan,LI Jie,QIAO Shuwei,SUN Tairan   

  1. *Department of General Surgery,Hebei North University Affiliated Second Hospital,Zhangjiakou 075100,China
  • Received:2025-06-24 Online:2026-06-08 Published:2026-06-08

Abstract: Objective To compare the therapeutic outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) with primary anastomosis versus taTME combined with modified Bacon procedure in low rectal cancer patients.Methods From January 2021 to January 2024,123 patients with low rectal cancer were enrolled and divided into two groups:the control group (n=73) underwent taTME with primary anastomosis,while the study group (n=50) received taTME combined with modified Bacon procedure.To compare the two groups in terms of perioperative indicators,specimen outcomes,anal function,inflammatory factors,quality of life,and complications.Results No significant differences were observed in operative time,intraoperative blood loss,prophylactic stoma rate,or conversion to laparotomy (P>0.05).The length of hospital stay in the study group was (10.42±4.27) days,which was shorter than that in the control group [(12.68±4.18) days],and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).One month after the operation,the scores of the anal incontinence Scale (Wexner) and low anterior rectal resection syndrome (LARS) in both groups were increased compared with those before the operation,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The levels of interleukin-6,high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interferon-γ in the study group 3 days after the operation were (49.47±8.15) pg/ml,(19.23±2.21) mg/L and (115.87±15.93) ng/L,respectively.The control groups were (54.38±7.19) pg/ml,(22.42±2.49) mg/L and (124.19 ±18.21) ng/L respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).One month after the operation,the scores of emotional status,social/family status,physical status and functional status in both groups were increased compared with those before the operation,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The scores of emotional status,social/family status,physical status and functional status of the research group one month after the operation were (23.21±2.18) points,(25.49±2.41) points,(24.33±2.24) points and (24.66±2.28) points respectively.The control groups were (19.66±2.28) points,(21.33±2.25) points,(20.28±2.49) points and (20.28±2.41) points respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The incidence rates of complications in the study group and the control group were 6.00% and 19.18% respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion For low rectal cancer patients,taTME combined with modified Bacon procedure demonstrates advantages in reducing postoperative inflammation,decreasing complications,shortening recovery time,and improving quality of life compared to taTME with primary anastomosis.

Key words: transanal total mesorectal excision, low rectal cancer, malignant tumors, improved Bacon technique, anal function

[1] WANG Maosen, LIU Guiwei, REN Weidan, YANG Lisheng, YE Haopeng, GUO Qingjin, GENG Xuechen, LI Meishuang, CUI Guocai, JIANG Guosheng. Comparison of clinical efficacy between modified Bacon procedure and low anterior resection in the treatment of patients with middle-low rectal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2026, 34(4): 422-426.
[2] LIAO Xiwang, DENG Chongwen. The application effect of colonic anal anastomosis and intersphincterectomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer with anal preservation and its impact on postoperative defecation function [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2026, 34(2): 182-185.
[3] LI Wenxi,ZHENG Xin,SUN Baoxin,ZHANG Haisheng,ZHU Zhida,ZHAO Enhong. Analysis of the therapeutic effects of traditional laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery, and intersphincteric resection surgery in the treatment of low rectal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(6): 632-636.
[4] HUA Lei, ZHI Chongyang. Clinical value of protecting external sphincter during operation of perianal abscess bypropensity score matching [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(2): 187-190.
[5] MENG Chuang, FAN Linchong, JIANG Dujun, ZHANG Yue. Construction and validation of a “difficult pelvis” prediction model for laparoscopic middle and low rectal cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(10): 1097-1101.
[6] HAN Ning, WANG Xiaodong, LI Yingchun, ZHOU Haihua, PAN Linlin, YU Chen. Influencing factors of poor anal function after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for extremely low rectal cancer and to construct a predictive model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 887-891.
[7] DAI Lianping,ZHANG Bo. Efficacy of three-cavity clearance,simple incision and drainage and incision thread drawing procedure on patients with perianal abscess and its influence on postoperative pain,wound healing and anal function recovery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(12): 1289-1292.
[8] ZHU Ronghua, HUANG Zhiyong. Advancements in the treatment of malignancies using a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immunomodulators [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(1): 92-95.
[9] GUO jia, ZHU Chuanxiang, HE Wei. Feasibility study about ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract with endorectal advancement flap in the treatment of high complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(1): 74-76.
[10] . Changes of serum IgA,serum amyloid A,chemotactic factor 5 and inflammatory cytokines in patients with anal fistula before and after operation and their relationship with anal function and efficacy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(5): 460-463.
[11] LIU Yi, QI Wei, LIU Baohua.. Protective ileostomy in low rectal cancer anus preservation surgery should pay attention to the problem [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(2): 186-189.
[12] ZHOU Chungen, NI Min, ZHU Yong, et al.. Research progress on minimally invasive treatment of anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(2): 190-192.
[13] XU Hongpeng, LEI Xiaomei, HU Min.. Influence of different kinds of LIFT on clinical efficacy for short-term and anal function of patients with complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 69-72.
[14] ZHANG Lei, SUN Yu, HUANG Yi.. Comparison of postoperative sphincter fistula ligation and incision and suture for postoperative pain,anal function and wound healing time of sphincter anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.
[15] OU Wenquan GUAN Guoxian.. Progress of sphincterectomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 797-799.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!