JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 69-72.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.01.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of different kinds of LIFT on clinical efficacy for short-term and anal function of patients with complex anal fistula

  

  1. Department of Anorectal,Dianjiang County Hospital of Traditional Chinese medicine,Chongqing 408300,China
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-01-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of conventional and modified LIFT on clinical efficacy for short-term and anal function of patients with complex anal fistula.Methods 94 patients with complex anal fistula were chosen in the period from January 2016 to January 2018 in our hospital and randomly divided into two groups including control group(47 patients)with conventional LIFT operation and modified group(47 patients)with modified LIFT operation;and the surgery-related clinical indicators,clinical efficacy for short-term,pain VAS score after operation,Wexner score of anal incontinence before and after surgery,anal and rectal pressure before and after surgery and complications incidence after surgery of both groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the surgery-related clinical indicators between 2 groups (P>0.05).The clinical efficacy for short-term of control group and modified group were separately 76.60%,93.62%.The clinical efficacy for shortterm of modified group were significant better than control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the pain VAS score after operation and Wexner score of anal incontinence after surgery between 2 groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the anal and rectal pressure before and after surgery between 2 groups (P>0.05).The incidence of intermuscular incision dehiscence infection and sphincter fistula of control group were separately 25.53%,14.89%.The incidence of intermuscular incision dehiscence infection and sphincter fistula of modified group were 14.89%,4.26%.The incidence of intermuscular incision dehiscence infection and sphincter fistula of modified group were significant lower than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional LIFT,modified LIFT in the treatment of patients with complex anal fistula can efficiently improve the overall clinical effect,promote the healing process of lesions,reduce the postoperative complications risk and not affect anal function.

Key words: ligation of intersphincter fistula, complex anal fistula, clinical efficacy for short-term, anal function

[1] ZHANG Lei, SUN Yu, HUANG Yi.. Comparison of postoperative sphincter fistula ligation and incision and suture for postoperative pain,anal function and wound healing time of sphincter anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.
[2] LU Linyuan, CAO Yongqing, ZHANG Qiang, et al.. Effect of videoscope-assisted surgery on the symptoms and prognosis in patients with complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(12): 1041-1043.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHEN Lin, DONG Hanhua, CHEN Qi, et al. Standardized procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy-Tongji university experience[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 5 -7 .
[2] ZHANG Tao, SUN Bei. Clinical practice guidelines for NCCN pancreatic cancer(V2 edition) updated in 2019[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 8 -11 .
[3] TANG Jianxiong, LI Hangyu. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of inguinalhernia in the elderly (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 12 -15 .
[4] WANG Wenqiang, ZHANG Erlei, XIANG Shuai, et al. Pulse-first continuous blockade technique: a new strategy for the resection of giant hepatic hemangioma[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 16 -18 .
[5] JIA Weidong, LIU Wenbin. Interpretation of multidisciplinary expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of hepatic hemangioma (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 19 -22 .
[6] CHEN Zhiyu, BIE Ping. Expert consensus on the application of choledochostomy in hepatolithiasis (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 23 -26 .
[7] LIN Jinna, LIU Qiang. Clinical practice guidelines of NCCN breast cancer updated in 2019: new advances in local treatment of breast cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 27 -30 .
[8] WEI Wei, LI Peng. Interpretation of the first edition of NCCN guidelines for the treatment of thyroid malignancy in 2019#br#[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 31 -34 .
[9] ZHANG Renquan, KANG Ning, NING Zhenghao. Interpretation of recommendations from Chinese clinical experts on robot-assisted esophagectomy (2019 edition)#br#[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 35 -37 .
[10] LIANG Han. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of liver metastasis of gastric cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 38 -40 .