JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 182-185.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250353

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The application effect of colonic anal anastomosis and intersphincterectomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer with anal preservation and its impact on postoperative defecation function

  

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery in the Second District of General Surgery,Loudi,417000 China
  • Received:2025-04-07 Accepted:2025-04-07 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-02-25

Abstract: Objective To explore the application effect of colonic anal anastomosis and intersphincterectomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer with anal preservation and their impact on postoperative defecation function.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 108 patients who underwent anal sphincter preservation surgery for low rectal cancer in hospitals from February 2019 to January 2024.According to the treatment plan,they were divided into an observation group (n=56) and a control group (n=52).Compare the surgical outcomes,Wexner anal incontinence score,anal pressure,and tumor markers between two groups.Results The observation group [(7.02±2.14) d] had a shorter discharge time than the control group [(10.02±2.06) d] (P<0.05).At 6 and 12 months after surgery,the Wexner Fecal Incontinence Score(Wexner FIS) in the observation group [(3.58±0.92)points and (2.06±0.52) points] was lower than that in the control group [(4.86±0.71) points and (3.31±0.49) points] (P<0.05).After surgery,the resting pressure of the anal canal,maximum systolic pressure of the anal canal,and maximum tolerance of the rectum decreased in both groups (P<0.05),with the observation group [(32.07±6.61) mmHg,(120.81±9.06) mmHg and (120.54±14.38) ml] being higher than the control group [(29.19±5.73) mmHg,(115.73±8.75) mmHg and (112.47±15.96) ml] (P<0.05).After surgery,CEA and CA199 decreased in both groups (P<0.05),with the observation group [(17.53±2.19) ng/ml and (41.06±3.97) U/ml] being lower than the control group [(19.08±3.62) ng/ml and (45.82±4.15) U/ml](P<0.05).Conclusion Both intersphincterectomy and colorectal anastomosis can achieve anal preservation treatment for low rectal cancer,and colorectal anastomosis is more helpful in improving patients' postoperative defecation function.

Key words: colonic anal anastomosis, intersphincterectomy, low rectal cancer, protecting the anus, defecation function

[1] LI Wenxi,ZHENG Xin,SUN Baoxin,ZHANG Haisheng,ZHU Zhida,ZHAO Enhong. Analysis of the therapeutic effects of traditional laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery, and intersphincteric resection surgery in the treatment of low rectal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(6): 632-636.
[2] MENG Chuang, FAN Linchong, JIANG Dujun, ZHANG Yue. Construction and validation of a “difficult pelvis” prediction model for laparoscopic middle and low rectal cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(10): 1097-1101.
[3] HAN Ning, WANG Xiaodong, LI Yingchun, ZHOU Haihua, PAN Linlin, YU Chen. Influencing factors of poor anal function after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for extremely low rectal cancer and to construct a predictive model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 887-891.
[4] DENG Fuqiang,LI Yiyu,FANG Zhiwei. Observation on efficacy,safety and defecation function of laparoscopic modified Soave short muscle sheath operation in the treatment of children with Hirschspr ung's disease [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 616-619.
[5] REN Xianghai, JIANG Qi, DIAO Mei, et al.. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high- and intermediate-type Persistent Cloaca [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(3): 266-269.
[6] LIU Yi, QI Wei, LIU Baohua.. Protective ileostomy in low rectal cancer anus preservation surgery should pay attention to the problem [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(2): 186-189.
[7] OU Wenquan GUAN Guoxian.. Progress of sphincterectomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 797-799.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 760 .