JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 66-68.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.01.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical application in laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of superior rectal artery

  

  1. Department of Anorectal Surgery,Suizhou Hospital,Hubei Medical University,Suizhou 441300,China
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-01-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate the feasibility,safety and efficacy of laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection for sigmoid cancer with preservation of superior rectal artery.Methods Laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection of superior rectal artery was performed in 25 cases and direct dissection of inferior mesenteric artery without preservation of superior rectal artery in 20 cases at the same time.The clinicopathological data,operative time,intestinal function recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time in SRA group and non-SRA group was(202.2±46.50)min and(147.5±37.3)min,and the recovery time of intestinal function was(2.1±1.1)days and(3.1 ±1.3)days,The hospitalization time was(8.1±0.9)days and(11.5±1.1)days,there were significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).The intraoperative bleeding volume in the SRA-sparing group and the non-SRA-sparing group was(65.3 ±10.2)ml and(59.2±9.9)ml,The number of lymph node dissectionwas(14.4±3.5)and(15.3±4.2),and the incidence of postoperative complications was 8%(2/25)and 15%(3/20),there were no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions The laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection  with preservation of superior rectal artery for sigmoid cancer is safe and feasible,the patients can recover early,and without increasing complication incidence,Thus  has great clinical value.

Key words: sigmoid cancer, superior rectal artery, lymph node dissection

[1] . Lymph Node Metastasis in thymic malignancies [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(7): 622-625.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHEN Lin, DONG Hanhua, CHEN Qi, et al. Standardized procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy-Tongji university experience[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 5 -7 .
[2] ZHANG Tao, SUN Bei. Clinical practice guidelines for NCCN pancreatic cancer(V2 edition) updated in 2019[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 8 -11 .
[3] TANG Jianxiong, LI Hangyu. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of inguinalhernia in the elderly (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 12 -15 .
[4] WANG Wenqiang, ZHANG Erlei, XIANG Shuai, et al. Pulse-first continuous blockade technique: a new strategy for the resection of giant hepatic hemangioma[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 16 -18 .
[5] JIA Weidong, LIU Wenbin. Interpretation of multidisciplinary expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of hepatic hemangioma (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 19 -22 .
[6] CHEN Zhiyu, BIE Ping. Expert consensus on the application of choledochostomy in hepatolithiasis (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 23 -26 .
[7] LIN Jinna, LIU Qiang. Clinical practice guidelines of NCCN breast cancer updated in 2019: new advances in local treatment of breast cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 27 -30 .
[8] WEI Wei, LI Peng. Interpretation of the first edition of NCCN guidelines for the treatment of thyroid malignancy in 2019#br#[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 31 -34 .
[9] ZHANG Renquan, KANG Ning, NING Zhenghao. Interpretation of recommendations from Chinese clinical experts on robot-assisted esophagectomy (2019 edition)#br#[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 35 -37 .
[10] LIANG Han. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of liver metastasis of gastric cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 38 -40 .