JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 492-494.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.06.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the efficacy of LCA in patients with IMA3 rectal cancer and the risk factors of postoperative anastomotic leakage during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

  

  1. Anorectal surgery,Shiyan people's Hospital(affiliated people's Hospital of Hubei Medical College);Hubei,Shiyan 442000,China
  • Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

Abstract: Objective To explore the left colic artery(LCA)during laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer Efficacy and risk factors of postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with inferior mesenteric artery(IMA)type 3 rectal cancer.Methods 102 patients with IMA3 rectal cancer were divided into the study group(52 cases)and the control group(50 cases)according to different surgical treatment methods.The study group was treated with LCA in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer,while the control group was treated with LCA without laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer,and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Results The operation time of the study group and the control group were(149.2±25.)minutes and(145.8±22.5)minutes,and the hospitalization time was(11.8±2.4)days and(12.2±2.8)days,respectively.The number of lymph node dissections was(14.6±2.5)The sum of(14.8±2.6)pieces of IMA root lymph node dissection was(3.2±1.3)and(3.0±1.5),respectively.The 1-year overall survival rate was 88.1% and 83.3%,respectively.The recurrence or metastasis rate were respectively.For 14.3% and 11.9%,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05),and the anal exhaust time was(35.6±5.4)hours and(45.3±8.6)hours,respectively.The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 1.9% and 14.0%,respectively.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of intestinal obstruction,urinary retention and urinary tract infection were 9.6% and 12.0%,1.9% and 4.0%,5.8% and 8.0%,respectively.Preoperative life quality was(56.2±9.2)and(56.5±10.5),and postoperative life quality was(78.8±12.2)and(78.4±12.0),respectively,with no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions〖WTBZ〗〓In the case of clinical safety and efficacy,the retention of LCA in laparoscopic radical resection of the rectum can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with IMA3.Therefore,in the future clinical work,these patients should be paid attention to.

Key words: Laparoscopic, radical resection of rectal cancer, inferior mesenteric artery, left colic artery, anastomotic leakage, influencing factors

[1] . Application of tipflexible ureteroscope treatment in impacted upper ureteral calculi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(7): 606-608.
[2] ZHENG Bing, WANG Wei, REN Rui, et al.. Analysis of complications and influencing factors of patients with choledocholithiasis after LC combined with EST [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(6): 485-488.
[3] WANG Yudu, LI Peng, GAO Ya, et al.. Clinical study of single-hole laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal ligation in the treatment of children with traffic hydrocele [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(6): 517-519.
[4] . Influence of preserving left colic artery during during laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer on anastomotic leakage and recent efficacy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(5): 400-403.
[5] . The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(5): 404-407.
[6] . The applications of laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction in treating ureteral injury caused by uterectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(5): 427-428.
[7] . Effect of highly selective minimally invasive in treatment of varicocele and its effect on serum indexes [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(2): 121-124.
[8] . Occurrence factor and treatment of anastomotic leakage after resection of esophageal carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(2): 152-154.
[9] HUANG Kan, LIU Song, CHEN Baojun.. The risk factors analysis of anastomotic leakage in treatment of radical esophagectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(9): 671-673.
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(12): 940-942.
[11] MA Renjie, HE Qi, ZHANG Haiwei, et al. Recent efficacy and safety of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal implantation in treatment of inguinal hernias [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(11): 862-864.
[12] REN Peng, ZHANG Ye, TAO Jianxin, et al. Effect of indocyanine green imaging on decrease the anastomotic fistula after laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 754-756.
[13] YANG Haining, YE Xiuhua. Curative effect of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute cholecystitis and its effect on ICAM1,MMP9 and VEGF [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 780-782.
[14] OU Wenquan GUAN Guoxian.. Progress of sphincterectomy in the treatment of low rectal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 797-799.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(5): 398 -0 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(6): 427 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(6): 474 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(11): 815 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(12): 890 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(12): 892 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(3): 222 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(5): 363 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(7): 493 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(9): 665 .