临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 804-807.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20241214

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

痔动脉结扎联合超声刀切除缝合缚扎悬吊术治疗环状脱垂性混合痔的临床疗效分析

  

  1. 201501 上海,上海市金山区中西医结合医院肛肠科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-19 修回日期:2024-07-19 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭其乐,Email:qilewq2012@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:上海市“十四五”中医特色专科资助项目(ZYTSZK1-1);上海市金山区第七周期医学重点专科“攀登计划”建设项目(JSZK2023B05);上海市金山区科学技术创新资金项目(2021-3-28)

Clinical efficacy analysis of hemorrhoidal artery ligation combined with ultrasonic knife excision suture tethering suspension for the treatment of circumferential prolapsed mixed hemorrhoids

  1. Department of Proctology,Shanghai Jinshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Shanghai 201501,China
  • Received:2024-07-19 Revised:2024-07-19 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-20

摘要: 目的 探讨痔动脉结扎联合超声刀切除缝合缚扎悬吊术治疗环状脱垂性混合痔的临床疗效。方法 2022年1月~2023年4月收治的环状脱垂性混合痔病人80例,根据治疗方案不同分为两组,研究组40例,给予痔动脉结扎联合超声刀切除缝合缚扎悬吊术治疗;对照组40例,给予外剥内扎联合胶圈套扎术治疗。比较两组病人手术疗效、手术情况、术后肛门疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、肛缘水肿及便血积分、改良健康调查简表中文版量表(SF-36)评分。结果 研究组治疗有效率为97.50%,高于对照组的77.50%(P<0.05);研究组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、创面愈合时间分别为(25.03±10.00)分钟、(10.00±5.32)ml、(7.25±1.54)天、(12.21±2.00)天,均优于对照组[(29.85±14.00)分钟、(17.85±10.25)ml、(11.87±2.35)天、(18.89±4.85)天],两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1天、3天、7天研究组肛门疼痛VAS评分分别为(4.25±0.85)分、(2.89±0.54)分、(2.00±0.30)分,肛缘水肿积分分别为(1.87±0.36)分、(1.41±0.30)分、(1.00±0.20)分,便血积分分别为(1.85±0.21)分、(1.34±0.18)分、(0.85±0.13)分,均优于对照组的[(7.56±1.10)分、(6.54±1.03) 分、(4.87±1.00)分][(2.40±0.58)分、(2.03±0.49) 分、(1.87±0.45)分][(2.45±0.55)分、(2.03±0.47) 分、(1.88±0.25)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),研究组随访1年病人复发率为2.50%,低于对照组的17.50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组SF-36评分社会功能、精神健康、生理机能、一般健康状况分别为(88.54±10.22)分、(87.87±10.58)分、(88.97±10.00)分、(89.95±10.05)分,均高于对照组的(67.52±10.00)分、(70.10±11.25)分、(71.10±9.85)分、(70.00±10.00)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 环状脱垂性混合痔病人以痔动脉结扎联合超声刀切除缝合缚扎悬吊术治疗,手术创伤小,利于促进术后康复,减轻肛门疼痛,改善肛缘水肿及便血,提高生活质量。

关键词: 痔动脉结扎, 超声刀, 缚扎悬吊术, 环状脱垂性混合痔, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of hemorrhoidal artery ligation combined with ultrasonic knife resection,suture,ligature and suspension in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids with annular prolapse.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted to select 80 patients with annular prolapse mixed hemorrhoids admitted to the anorectal Department of our hospital from January 2022 to April 2023.According to different treatment plans,they were divided into control group(n=40 cases) who received external stripping and internal ligation combined with tape ligation,and study group(n=40 cases) who received hemorrhoidal artery ligation combined with ultrasonic knife resection,suture,ligation and suspension.The operative effect,operative status,postoperative anal pain,anal edema,stool blood score and quality of life were evaluated.Results The effective rate of the study group was 97.50%,which was higher than that of the control group(77.50%)(P<0.05).The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay and wound healing time of the research group were (25.03±10.00) minutes, (10.00±5.32)ml, (7.25±1.54) days and (12.21±2.00) days respectively. [is better than that of control group (29.85±14.00) minutes, ml (17.85±10.25), (11.87±2.35), (18.89±4.85) days], two groups of comparison, the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05 ).The VAS scores of anal pain in the study group on 1 day, 3 days and 7 days after the operation were (4.25±0.85) points, (2.89±0.54) points and (2.00±0.30) points,respectively.The scores of perianal edema were (1.87±0.36) points, (1.41±0.30) points, and (1.00±0.20) points,respectively.The hematochezia scores were (1.85±0.21) points, (1.34±0.18) points, and (0.85±0.13) points,respectively.Which were better than that of control group [(7.56±1.10), (6.54±1.03), (4.87±1.00)] [(2.40±0.58), (2.03±0.49), (1.87±0.45)] [(2.45±0.55), (2.03±0.47),(1.88±0.25)], and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).The recurrence rate was 2.50% in the study group and 17.50% in the control group(P<0.05).The scores of SF,MH,PF and GH of the Modified Health Survey Summary Form(SF-36) in the study group were(88.54±10.22,87.87±10.58,88.97±10.00,89.95±10.05) higher than those of the control group(67.52±10.00,70.10±11.25,71.10±9.85,70.00±10.00)(P<0.05).Conclusion Hemorrhoidal artery ligation combined with ultrasonic knife resection,suture,ligature and suspension in the treatment of patients with annular prolapse mixed hemorrhoids has ideal surgical effect and little trauma,which is beneficial to promoting postoperative rehabilitation,alleviating anal pain,improving anal edema and hematostoecium,and improving quality of life.

Key words: hemorrhoidal artery ligation, ultrasonic knife, tethered suspension, circumferential prolapsed mixed hemorrhoids, clinical efficacy

[1] 张志强 孙欣 高印奇 矫健 刘思琪 林方才. 真空辅助微创旋切术治疗乳腺下象限良性病变的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 852-855.
[2] 杨斌 刘彩霞 郭娜 高浩洋 王祎 李楠 陈海涛 李英超. 应用Brisson术式联合精准测量方案治疗隐匿性阴茎初步探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 470-473.
[3] 王冰 刘子靖 阳泽龙 菅雁兵 张淋淋 李晨 姚京 田文. 无充气锁骨下入路腔镜手术治疗原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 251-255.
[4] 卢精华 刘启学 吴春艳 苏玉光. 直肠上动脉栓塞术治疗Ⅱ~Ⅲ期内痔的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(4): 429-432.
[5] 熊坚威 李强 唐涛 张立鑫 英保 赵开烽 熊永福 李敬东 武国. 经肝动脉化疗栓塞联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂及程序性死亡受体-1抗体治疗中晚期不可切除肝细胞癌的临床疗效和安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 176-181.
[6] 朱新新 骆建军 王晓霞 蒋光伟 王黎鹏 郭起峰 孟威 邹春喜 杨箬箬 吴舒沁 吴倩. 床旁纤维支气管镜治疗对创伤性颅脑损伤合并肺部感染机械通气病人的临床影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 826-829.
[7] 胡家瑞 宋明 余来. 经皮微创与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 881-884.
[8] 曹磊 李文 骆惊涛 柯创武 张泽. 多种能量器械在甲状腺癌手术应用中的对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 553-556.
[9] 严凤翔. 辅助TriGen交锁髓内钉联合肩外展架治疗肱骨近端骨折临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 330-333.
[10] 张松 杨璞 时宏富 胡海清 徐海军. 开放楔形胫骨高位截骨术治疗内翻膝骨关节炎的疗效观察及治疗体验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 286-289.
[11] 梁文杰 黎然 冯疆勉 李卫伶 洪文彬. 改良Karl-storz单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效及对免疫功能和炎症反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1155-1158.
[12] 陈辉海 薛双桃 赵广超 吴天亮 张俊德. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1073-1076.
[13] 彭永胜 何久盛. 传统顺行置入载距突螺钉与逆行置入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1082-1085.
[14] 李小川 黄春明 罗绍坚 范武 董智晖 蓝根 卢明南 林强祯 陆军海韦健 黎欲强 黄冀. 颈前路Hybrid术式治疗跳跃节段颈椎病的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 65-69.
[15] 辛国军 王建承 翁原驰 张俊. 全胰腺切除术9例临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 619-621.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[2] 于振涛. 食管胃交界腺癌手术治疗现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 537 .
[3] 蔡建平;王亚东;张晓等. 结构脂肪乳与中/长链脂肪乳对胰十二指肠切除术后病人肝功能、蛋白质代谢、细胞免疫功能及临床不良反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(10): 781 -784 .
[4] 雷尚通. 甲状腺系膜切除术—基于解剖层面的手术技术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(11): 823 .
[5] 马雪中;顾晓箭. 体外冲击波碎石术仍然是上尿路结石治疗的重要角色[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(2): 94 .
[6] 胡慧;韦伟;易辛等. 信号传导与转录激活因子3在乳腺癌中的表达及其与人基质金属蛋白酶2、9的关系研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(7): 516 .
[7] 温小鹏;高山;李硕等. 3D打印技术应用于胸骨缺损修复的可行性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(8): 608 .
[8] 郭亮;刘正昊;刘宝林. 手术切除肝尾叶肉瘤样癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(9): 693 .
[9] 吴浩;苏小虎;易文波等. 支气管封堵器隔离左肺盲探插管方法的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(1): 61 .
[10] 庄瑜 施盛 杨迪成 袁忠祥 王利民. 吸入一氧化氮对主动脉弓置换患者呼吸道功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 795 -796 .