临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 924-927.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250782

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Limberg皮瓣转移成形术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的效果和安全性分析

  

  1. 210001  江苏南京,南京中医药大学附属南京中医院,江苏省中医肛肠临床创新中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-03 接受日期:2025-08-03 出版日期:2026-08-20 发布日期:2026-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 何蕾,Email:13115003347@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省中医药科技发展项目(ZD202226)

Efficacy and safety of modified Limberg flap transposition in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus

  1. Department of Anorectal,Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Jiangsu Provincial Clinical Innovation Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Anorectal Diseases,Nanjing 210001,China
  • Received:2025-08-03 Accepted:2025-08-03 Online:2026-08-20 Published:2026-08-20

摘要: 目的 探讨Limberg皮瓣转移成形术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的临床效果及安全性。方法 2022年1月~2023年8月收治骶尾部藏毛窦病人110例,根据手术方式分为两组,对照组50例,采用传统藏毛窦切开术,观察组60例,采用Limberg皮瓣转移成形术。比较两组病人术后恢复时间、炎症指标、疼痛评分及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组术后住院时间为(8.98±3.15)天,长于对照组的(7.24±3.54)天,观察组术后创面愈合时间为(9.95±2.96)天,短于对照组的(29.78±2.18)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组白细胞(WBC)为(6.34±0.38)×109/L 、C-反应蛋白(CRP)为( 1.89±0.28)mg/L,低于对照组的(7.56±0.54)×109/L 、( 2.47±0.47)mg/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后24小时,36小时疼痛评分分别为(5.32±1.03)分和(2.10±0.34)分,分别低于对照组的(6.29±1.13)分和(4.48±1.12 )分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组切口感染5例,切口裂开8例,张力性水泡11例,随访期内无复发。对照组随访期间复发4例,无切口感染、裂开、张力性水泡等并发症。观察组较对照组复发率更低,两组比较(除切口感染外)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论  Limberg皮瓣转移成形术方案治疗骶尾部藏毛窦,可缩短术后恢复时间,减轻炎性反应程度,缓解疼痛,且复发率低。

关键词: 骶尾部藏毛窦, Limberg皮瓣转移成形术, 效果, 安全性

Abstract: Objective  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Limberg flap transposition technique in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .Methods A total of 110 patients diagnosed with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus at our hospital between January 2022 and August 2023 were enrolled.They were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure:50 patients in the control group underwent conventional pilonidal sinus excision,whereas 60 patients in the observation group received the Limberg flap transposition procedure.Postoperatively,recovery time,inflammatory indices,pain scores,and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The postoperative hospital stay of the observation group was (8.98±3.15) days,which was longer than that of the control group (7.24±3.54) days.The postoperative wound healing time of the observation group was (9.95±2.96) days,which was shorter than that of the control group (29.78±2.18) days.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The white blood cell count (WBC) in the observation group was (6.34±0.38)×109/L,C-reactive protein (CRP) was (1.89-0.28 mg/L),which was lower than the control group[(7.56±0.54)×109/L 、( 2.47±0.47)mg/L].There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The pain scores of the observation group at 24 hours and 36 hours after the operation were (5.32±1.03) points and (2.10±0.34) points respectively,which were lower than those of the control group [(6.29±1.13) points and (4.48±1.12) points] respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).With respect to postoperative complications,the observation group experienced 5 cases of wound infection,8 cases of wound dehiscence,and 11 cases of tension blisters;no recurrence was observed during the follow-up period.In the control group,four patients developed recurrence,whereas no cases of wound infection,dehiscence,or tension blisters were recorded.The recurrence rate was significantly lower in the observation group,although the incidence of postoperative complications was higher;the difference between the groups (except for incision infection) was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The Limberg flap transposition technique for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus shortens postoperative recovery time,attenuates the inflammatory response,alleviates pain,and reduces the risk of recurrence.

Key words: sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, modified Limberg flap transfer plasty, effect, safety

[1] 张楠 张亚芳 周琪. 人工智能辅助影像学评价局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗效果[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(8): 876-879.
[2] 侯秋惠 刘轼 侯桂婷 李雪光. 超声引导下股神经阻滞联合艾司氯胺酮对全膝关节置换术病人血流动力学及镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(8): 943-947.
[3] 郭延洪,唐璟,卢世霞,包煜忠,赵雪梅,阿良德,刘震. 超声引导下胸神经阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞对乳腺癌根治术后麻醉效果的比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(6): 645-648.
[4] 毕亭亭,丁子明,李永,张前进,刘岩. 腹腔镜下中低位直肠癌根治术中不同吻合口加固方式的效果评价[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(6): 671-674.
[5] 张肖. 高龄病人腹腔镜下腹股沟疝日间手术安全性及可行性探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(2): 161-163.
[6] 曹卓涵, 高冠英, 朱一川, 周湘, 徐雁. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征髋关节镜翻修手术的临床效果及影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 78-81.
[7] 黄瑛, 吴小蔚, 邓海峰, 靳茜雅, 何梦君, 贺胜, 吴海东, 章强. 改良缝纫式埋线法重睑成形术的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 103-106.
[8] 袁双龙 刘秀军 贾立周. 巨大滤泡状甲状腺癌伴甲亢及多处转移一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 1007-1008.
[9] 邵辉 王璐 汤洁莹 陈强 张世红 侯亦康 徐鑫宇 杨建民 李薇薇. 经乳晕小切口联合吸脂术治疗男性乳房发育症[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 767-.
[10] 李文熙 郑鑫 孙宝信 张海生 朱志达 赵恩宏. 传统腹腔镜手术、经自然腔道取标本手术和经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(6): 632-636.
[11] 高翔 张洪波 张大坤 郑瀚 高纪元 孟强 张浪 郭婷秀. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗不同大小及位置上尿路结石的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 523-526.
[12] 汤海蓉,丁锦荣,崔益秋,张晶晶. 超早期肠内营养支持对重型颅脑损伤病人血清miR-124、炎症因子、免疫功能、营养状态及康复效果的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(4): 383-387.
[13] 国际肝胆胰协会中国分会 中华医学会外科学分会肝脏外科学组. 肝细胞癌合并乙肝肝硬化病人肝切除安全性评估专家共识[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 225-236.
[14] 余昌伟 叶建华 吴刚 唐爱平. 超声引导肋间与胸椎旁神经阻滞对腔镜下肺叶切除术麻醉药用量及镇痛效果影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 275-279.
[15] 冯松林 邓琳 赵丹 何文飞 张涛. 小儿单纯性硬膜外血肿保守治疗的疗效分析及血肿吸收预测模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(11): 1143-1147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 江帆;孙权;吴国俊;等. 不同引流方式对恶性梗阻性黄疸患者细胞免疫的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 760 .
[2] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[3] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[4] 杨永辉;李欣欣;郝孟辉;等. 孤立性肺结节的诊治分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 856 .
[5] 凌地洋;王哲银;卢振和;等. 自体血注射联合吲哚美辛巴布膏治疗顽固性网球肘的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 882 .
[6] 张亭亭;余英豪. 胃癌潜在预后分子标志物的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 885 .
[7] 高纯;胡俊波. 临床营养筛查与评估方法的现状与进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 896 .
[8] 张进军;杨志芳;李兴睿. 聚乳酸生物可吸收膜在甲状腺手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 927 .
[9] 杨新;吴会生;王焱林. 纳美芬在脊柱侧弯矫形术术中唤醒中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 957 .
[10] 吴强;王欣;张慧俊. 七例手部肿瘤误诊分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 922 .