临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 422-426.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250506

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良Bacon术与低位前切除术治疗中低位直肠癌临床疗效比较

王茂森 刘桂伟 任维聃 杨立胜 冶浩鹏 郭庆金 耿学辰 李梅双 崔国才 姜国胜   

  1. 061000河北沧州,河北医科大学附属沧州市中心医院结直肠肛门医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-15 出版日期:2026-06-08 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 刘桂伟,Email:1060962528@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2023年度河北省卫生健康委医学科学研究课题计划项目(20232120)

Comparison of clinical efficacy between modified Bacon procedure and low anterior resection in the treatment of patients with middle-low rectal cancer

WANG Maosen,LIU Guiwei,REN Weidan,YANG Lisheng,YE Haopeng,GUO Qingjin,GENG Xuechen,LI Meishuang,CUI Guocai,JIANG Guosheng   

  1. Colorectal and Anorectal Medical Center ,Hebei Medical University Affiliated Cangzhou Central Hospital,Cangzhou 061000,China
  • Received:2025-05-15 Online:2026-06-08 Published:2026-06-08

摘要: 目的 探讨改良Bacon术与低位前切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床疗效。方法 2023年1月~2024年12月接受手术治疗的中低位直肠癌病人130例,根据吻合方式的不同分为A组和B组,A组109例,采用腹腔镜下低位前切除术;B组21例,采用腹腔镜下改良Bacon术。比较两组病人的基线资料、手术相关指标、术后病理相关指标以及术后恢复情况。分别于术后第1、3、6、9、12个月采用LARS评分表以及Wexner评分表对术后病人肛门恢复功能进行评价。结果 两组病人手术时间、术中出血量、肿瘤大体分型、肿瘤环周长度、术后30天并发症等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组肿瘤下缘距齿状线距离分别为(5.31±1.21)cm和(2.41±0.65)cm,T3~T4期肿瘤病人比例分别为80%和57%,住院时间分别为(9.35±4.83)天和(21.38±4.33)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05。A组和B组术后第1个月、第3个月和第6个月重度LARS发生率分别为54%和86%,41%和76%,27%和62%,Wexner评分分别为(10.12±2.01)分和(14.57±2.39)分,(7.05±1.33)分和(9.71±1.58)分,(3.23±1.24)分和(5.43±1.66)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组和B组术后第9个月及第12个月两组病人的重度LARS发生率与Wexner评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 改良Bacon术相比传统低位前切除术未明显增加术后早期并发症,术后肛门功能非劣于低位前切除术病人。

关键词: 改良Bacon术, 低位前切除术, 中低位直肠癌, 术后并发症

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of the modified Bacon procedure and low anterior resection in the treatment of patients with middle and low rectal cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 130 patients with mid to low rectal cancer who underwent surgical treatment in the Colorectal and Anal Surgery Department of our hospital from January 2023 to December 2024.They were divided into Group A (laparoscopic anterior resection group,109 cases) and Group B (laparoscopic modified Bacon surgery group,21 cases) according to different anastomosis methods.The baseline data,surgical related indicators,postoperative pathological related indicators,and postoperative recovery of the two groups of patients were compared.The recovery function of the anus of the postoperative patients was evaluated by using the LARS scoring scale and the Wexner scoring scale at 1,3,6,9 and 12 months after the operation respectively.Results There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) between the two groups of patients in terms of surgical time,intraoperative blood loss,tumor gross classification,tumor circumferential length,and postoperative complications at 30 days.The distances from the lower edge of the tumor to the dentate line in group A and group B were (5.31±1.21)cm and (2.41±0.65)cm,respectively.The proportions of patients with stage T3-T4 tumors were 80% and 57%,respectively.The lengths of hospital stay were (9.35±4.83) days and (21.38±4.33) days,respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The incidences of severe LARS in group A and group B at 1 month,3 months and 6 months after surgery were 54% and 86%,41% and 76%,27% and 62%,respectively,and the Wexner scores were (10.12±2.01) points and (14.57±2.39) points,(7.05±1.33) points and (9.71±1.58) points,(3.23±1.24) points and (5.43±1.66) points,respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).There was no significant statistical difference in the incidence of severe LARS and Wexner score between the two groups of patients at 9 and 12 months after surgery (P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional low anterior resection,the modified Bacon procedure does not significantly increase early postoperative complications,and postoperative anal function is not inferior to that of patients undergoing low anterior resection.

Key words: improved Bacon procedure, low anterior resection, middle-low rectal cancer, postoperative complications

[1] 罗冰清 王志丽 王瑄 李洁 乔舒巍 孙太冉. 经肛全直肠系膜切除术联合改良Bacon术与经肛全直肠系膜切除术一期吻合术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(4): 427-431.
[2] 朱媛 余金 孙华朋 李晓刚 廖晓锋. 陈氏胰肠吻合在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中应用的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 289-293.
[3] 孟闯 范林冲 蒋笃均 张跃. 腹腔镜中低位直肠癌手术“困难骨盆”预测模型构建及验证[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(10): 1097-1101.
[4] 徐业成 傅德良. 胰腺全切除术在胰腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 677-679.
[5] 许争 陆子龙 夏立明. 不同手术方式对女性单侧cT1N0-1a期甲状腺癌治疗效果及切口美容满意度的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 481-483.
[6] 罗华荣 顾嬿 黄盛松 徐琼峰 徐成党 王天如. 多功能支架与传统内支架在膀胱全切输尿管皮肤造口病人中应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(11): 1211-1214.
[7] 何辉虎 徐如彬 姚启杨 夏国志. 经盲肠末端回肠插管造口术在保护高危直肠吻合口中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 461-465.
[8] 邓涛 何杰. 基于膜解剖下腹腔镜直肠癌根治术对泌尿功能的保护作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1164-1166.
[9] 郭德凯 刘蕾 马睿锐 贡海兵 李兵兵 高翔 江雨波 汪洋 王从俊. 高龄病人行胰十二指肠切除术探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[10] 孙启刚, 符策雄, 郑进方. 绕肝悬吊前入路右半肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[11] 孙纪三, 谢炎, 罗宇涵, 蒋文涛. 肝移植肠道微生态研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1085-1088.
[12] 吴分浪, 关则俭, 陈盛勇等. 脑室腹腔分流术后颅内感染20例诊治体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 615-617.
[13] 吕龙 王东华 陶正贵 . 肠腔灌洗在直肠低位前切除术中的应用价值 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(2): 131-132.
[14] 陈春洲 潘志坚 唐刚等. T管引流术后并发症20例临床分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(1): 67-68.
[15] 宋少伟 郭克建. 保留十二指肠的胰头切除术的手术要点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(9): 616-618.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!