临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1211-1214.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240115

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

多功能支架与传统内支架在膀胱全切输尿管皮肤造口病人中应用

  

  1. 200065   上海 ,同济大学附属同济医院泌尿外科(罗华荣、黄盛松、徐琼峰、徐成党、王天如),普通外科(顾嬿)
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-20 接受日期:2024-01-20 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 王天如,Email:wangtianruwtr@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科技计划项目(21ZR1458300)

Application of multifunctional and traditional internal stents in patients with total ureteral resection cutaneous stomy

  1. Urology Department,Tongji University Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Shanghai 200065,China
  • Received:2024-01-20 Accepted:2024-01-20 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-20

摘要: 目的  对比多功能输尿管造口支架和传统输尿管造口内支架在膀胱全切输尿管皮肤造口病人中应用。方法  前瞻性选取2019年3月~2023年3月本院收治的膀胱癌并择期行膀胱根治性切除加尿流改道术病人102例,按随机数排秩法将病人分为研究组(51例)与对照组(51例),对照组予以传统单J输尿管造口内支架引流装置,研究组予以多功能输尿管造口支架引流装置。比较两组社会心理适应量表-23(OAI-23)评分、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、近期并发症发生情况、远期并发症发生情况、生活质量评分采用膀胱癌特异性量表(FACT-BL评分)的差异。结果  研究组术后1个月、3个月、6个月OAI评分分别为(49.33±4.07)分、(57.29±3.90)分、(68.25±3.76)分;对照组分别为(44.25±4.61)分、(52.31±4.58)分、(59.06±4.37)分,与术前比较均升高,且研究组均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术后3个月、术后6个月eGFR分别为(86.07±4.07)ml/min、(88.01±3.01)ml/min;对照组分别为(83.09±3.06)ml/min、(85.06±5.09)ml/min,与术前比较均升高,且研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组近期并发症总发生率低于对照组(7.84% vs. 23.53%,P<0.05)。研究组远期并发症总发生率低于对照组(43.14% VS 78.43%,P<0.05)。研究组术后6个月FACT-BL总分为(129.59±5.74)分;对照组为(114.10±10.37)分,与术前比较升高,且研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论  多功能输尿管造口支架应用于膀胱全切输尿管皮肤造口病人可有效改善造口适应性,促进肾功能恢复,减少近期和远期并发症发生风险,提高病人生活质量。

关键词: 膀胱根治性切除术, 输尿管皮肤造口, 多功能输尿管造口支架, 传统输尿管造口内支架, 术后并发症, 肾功能

Abstract: Objective  To compare the application of multifunctional ureterostomy stent and traditional ureterostomy internal stent in patients with total ureterostomy.Methods  Prospectively,102 patients with bladder cancer and undergoing elective radical cystectomy with urinary diversion admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2023 were selected for the study.According to the random number rank method,the patients were divided into the study group (51 cases) and the control group (51 cases).The control group was given a traditional singleJ ureteral stomy stent drainage device,and the research group was given a multifunctional ureteral stomy stent drainage device.The differences of OAI score,renal function index (eGFR),recent complications,long-term complications and quality of life (FACT-BL score) were compared between the two groups.Results  OAI scores 1 month,3 months and 6 months after surgery (study group:49.33±4.07,57.29±3.90,68.25±3.76;control group:44.25±4.61,52.31±4.58,59.06±4.37) and before surgery (study group:32.71±4.32;control group:33.18±4.74) compared with higher levels (P<0.05),but the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).Repeated measurement ANOVA results showed that eGFR at 3 months and 6 months after surgery (study group:86.07±4.07,88.01±3.01;control group:83.09±3.06,85.06±5.09) and before surgery (study group:82.05±6.04;control group:81.03±5.06) compared with higher levels (P<0.05),but the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).The total rate of recent complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (7.84% VS 23.53%,P<0.05).The total incidence of long-term complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (43.14% VS 78.43%,P<0.05).Emotional status score,physical status score,functional status score,social and family status score,BSS score,FACT-BL total score of the two groups 6 months after surgery (study group:20.25±2.36,24.92±1.87,25.65±1.11,26.02±1.14,32.75±1.76,129.59±5.74;Control group:18.65±3.10,20.18±3.02,23.51±1.29,21.51±2.24,30.26±3.07,114.10±10.37) and preoperative (study group:14.27±3.56,16.57±3.58,17.27±2.35,17.49±2.64,23.41±5.25,89.02±13.62;Control group:14.39±3.44,16.47±3.25,17.22±2.34,17.55±2.59,23.43±5.25,89.25±13.62) were increased (P<0.05),and the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion  The application of multifunctional ureteral stent in patients with ureteral cutaneous stomy with total cystotomy can effectively improve the adaptability of stomy,promote the recovery of renal function,reduce the risk of short-term and long-term complications,and improve the quality of life of patients.

Key words: radical cystectomy, ureteral cutaneous stomy, multifunctional ureterostomy stent, traditional ureterostomy stent, postoperative complications, renal function

[1] 徐业成 傅德良. 胰腺全切除术在胰腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 677-679.
[2] 杨昆鑫 陆迪涵 刘艺 冯霞. 臂丛神经阻滞对动静脉造瘘术后血管通畅率的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 593-598.
[3] 许争 陆子龙 夏立明. 不同手术方式对女性单侧cT1N0-1a期甲状腺癌治疗效果及切口美容满意度的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 481-483.
[4] 姜啸烨 杨帆 孙振业 高闫尧 黄启秀. 肾肿瘤剜除术对局限性肾癌病人肾功能、肾实质及畸胎瘤衍生生长因子-1的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 584-586.
[5] 何辉虎 徐如彬 姚启杨 夏国志. 经盲肠末端回肠插管造口术在保护高危直肠吻合口中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 461-465.
[6] 丁大帅 廖敏 王锋 毛振 郭天旺 宋勇波. 成人重度肾积水肾穿刺造瘘术肾盂引流液蛋白水平与肾功能关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 122-126.
[7] 殷金成 刘洪新 顾燕青 唐新宇 郭宗保. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗直径2~3cm肾结石对病人肾功能及炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 133-136.
[8] 邓思昌 许自力. 肾移植受者远期PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折微创固定治疗一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(2): 198-199.
[9] 邓涛 何杰. 基于膜解剖下腹腔镜直肠癌根治术对泌尿功能的保护作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1164-1166.
[10] 田恒娜 桑剑锋 周铮. 甲状腺全切除术后血清全段甲状旁腺激素和血钙对永久性甲状旁腺功能减退症的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 64-67.
[11] 郭德凯 刘蕾 马睿锐 贡海兵 李兵兵 高翔 江雨波 汪洋 王从俊. 高龄病人行胰十二指肠切除术探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[12] 陈家财 曾宾华 李金雨 罗辉 林山. 腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾癌的疗效及对肾功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 121-124.
[13] 孙启刚, 符策雄, 郑进方. 绕肝悬吊前入路右半肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[14] 李静, 孙冬弢. 重度颅脑损伤病人颅内血肿清除术后急性肾功能不全的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 581-583.
[15] 查正彪, 潘友民, 郑智等. Stanford A型主动脉夹层术后急性肾功能损伤危险因素分析及预后[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 467-470.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[3] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[4] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[5] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[6] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[7] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[8] 曹志新. 基于膜解剖的胃癌D2手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 812 .
[9] 石汉平. 胃癌围手术期营养治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 821 .
[10] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .