临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 965-967.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.11.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

CT值联合熵值对输尿管上段结石行体外冲击波治疗的预测价值

  

  1. 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院泌尿外科
  • 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20

Predicative value of CT value combined entropy on the extracorporeal shock wave lLithotripsy effect of patients with proximal ureteral stone

  • Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20

摘要: 目的:探讨CT值联合熵值预测体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管上段结石疗效的应用价值。方法:收集2017年10月~2018年6月于我院行非增强多层螺旋CT(MDCT)检查和ESWL的输尿管上段结石的病人共83例,根据治疗后4周结石清除效果分为成功组(52例)和失败组(31例)。比较两组病人的性别、年龄和结石直径以及结石CT值和熵值,分析结石CT值联合熵值对病人 ESWL 治疗效果的预测价值。结果:31例(37%)病人碎石失败。两组的病人的基本资料如性别,年龄和结石直径比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。成功组的CT值为(691.73±171.34)HU,失败组为(852.74±180.98)HU,成功组的熵值为4.25±0.57,失败组为4.81±0.41,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。根据CT值(750HU)和熵值(4.5)将病人分为4个危险类别,CT值>750HU和熵值>4.5(10/29),CT值≤750HU和熵值>4.5(7/13),CT值>750HU和熵值≤4.5(11/14),CT值≤750HU和熵值≤4.5(24/27),其相关的ESWL清石率分别为34.5%,53.8%,78.6%,88.9%。结论:结石CT值联合熵值可较好地预测输尿管上段结石病人ESWL的治疗效果,CT值和熵值越低,ESWL治疗后结石清除率越高。

关键词: 体外冲击波碎石术, 输尿管上段结石, CT值, 熵值

Abstract: Objective:To investigate whether CT value combined with entropy can predict the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL)in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi.Methods:A total of 83 patients with upper ureteral calculi who underwent unenhanced multislice spiral CT(MDCT)and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from October 2017 to June 2018 were collected.According to the stone removal effect 4 weeks after treatment,the patients were divided into successful group(n=52)and failure group(n=31).The success of ESWL was defined as the absence of residual stone fragments or residual stone fragments no larger than 2mm after 4 weeks of single lithotripsy.The basic data of the two groups,such as sex,age and stone diameter,were analyzed and compared.At the same time,the CT value and entropy of stones in the two groups were statistically compared,and the predictive value of stone CT combined with entropy to the therapeutic effect of ESWL was analyzed.Results:31 patients(37%)failed in lithotripsy.There was no significant difference in basic data such as sex,age and stone diameter between the two groups(P>0.05).The CT value of success group was(691.73±171.34)HU,and that of failure group was(852.74±180.98)HU.There was significant difference between the two groups.The entropy value of success group was(4.25±0.57),and that of failure group was(4.81±0.41).There was significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).According to the CT value and entropy value,the patients were divided into four risk categories:Ct value >750HU and entropy value >4.5(10/29),Ct value ≤750HU and entropy value >4.5(7/13),Ct value >750HU and entropy value ≤4.5(11/14),Ct value ≤750HU and entropy value≤4.5(24/27),the related ESWL stone removal rates were 34.5%,53.8%,78.6% and 88.9%,respectively.Conclusion:The CT value combined with entropy can predict the therapeutic effect of ESWL in patients with upper ureteral calculi.The lower the CT value and entropy value,the higher the stone clearance rate after ESWL treatment.

Key words: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, proximal ureteral stone, CT value, entropy

[1] 吴奔, 杨凯, 朱劲松等. 末端可弯输尿管镜在嵌顿性输尿管上段结石治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 606-608.
[2] 彭伟, 魏世平, 李辉明, 陶维雄, 顾鹏. 输尿管镜联合封堵器治疗输尿管上段结石失败原因的分析及对策[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 116-117.
[3] 彭华荣, 孙魁, 冯子驹. 经腹侧与经背侧超声定位在输尿管上段结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗中的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 126-128.
[4] 杨荣权 蔡勇 余兆雄等. 输尿管镜不同功率钬激光治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(4): 313-314.
[5] 李辉明 陶维雄 王进等. 经后腹腔途径腹腔镜输尿管切开取石86例报告 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(3): 234-235.
[6] 董锐 徐肇斌 王国举等 . 微通道与标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床对比分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(1): 50-52.
[7] 王浩 胡云飞 余晓晖. 后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(9): 661-663.
[8] 周建华;高新;湛海伦等. 后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床体会(附106例报告)[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(8): 578-580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 目录[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 829 .
[2] 钱永尚, 余铃, 杨东风, 肖松, 李建东, 程晓锋. 微创经皮钢板接骨术与传统开放手术用于治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 904 -906 .
[3] 孙展, 韩斐, 罗凡砚, 陈育斌. 杂交手术治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 925 -927 .
[4] 孟庆友, 赵彬. 复杂腹主动脉夹层动脉瘤腔内治疗的现状及进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 928 -930 .
[5] 卢晨, 杨鹏, 黄尧, 刘宇, 胡佳. 多层血流调节器治疗主动脉夹层术后远端残余夹层的临床经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 931 -934 .
[6] 丁帅, 马先桃, 程才. 杂交技术在Stanford A型主动脉夹层的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 935 -937 .
[7] 方坤, 罗明尧, 赵嘉伟, 薛云飞, 舒畅. 3D导航技术在主动脉腔内修复术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 938 -942 .
[8] 顾建军, 刘杰, 薛正龙, 陈立华 . 一站式杂交手术治疗 Stanford A型主动脉夹层的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 943 -945 .
[9] 吴建涛, 王家富, 池一凡等. 心血管外科术后胸部切口愈合不良高危因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 946 -949 .
[10] 吴满仓, 李志强, 吴东妮等. 乳腺非特殊类型浸润性癌1721例检出趋势及分布特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 950 -952 .