临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 135-138.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250422

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

皮内缝合联合改良置管在肺癌单孔腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用及其对切口愈合的影响

  

  1. 430060  湖北武汉,武汉大学人民医院胸外科(韦树健、秦琦、范青禄、聂志浩、胡海丰、刘高利、谢颂平);湖北省阳新县人民医院心胸外科(侯国强)
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-21 接受日期:2025-04-21 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 谢颂平,Email:songping0428@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(8227010540);湖北省微循环学会科研资助基金[HBWXH2025(1)-5]

Application of intradermal suture combined with improved intubation method inpatients with lung cancer undergoing single-aperture thoracoscopic lobectomy and its effect on incision healing

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
  • Received:2025-04-21 Accepted:2025-04-21 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-02-25

摘要: 目的 分析皮内缝合联合改良胸腔引流管置管在肺癌单孔腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用效果及其对切口愈合的影响。方法 2020年7月~2023年8月于我院行单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的肺癌病人222例。按照入院时间顺序分为两组,对照组93例,采用间断缝合联合传统置管,研究组129例,采用皮内缝合联合改良置管。随访至术后1个月,比较两组切口愈合、术后疼痛及瘢痕美观情况。结果 研究组和对照组胸管非计划性脱管率分别为3.10% 和7.53%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组和对照组术后带管时间分别为(5.10±2.00)天 和(6.80±1.72)天,术后住院时间分别为(11.45±5.53)天和(13.91±6.82)天,切口愈合时间分别为(6.81±2.51)天和(9.11±2.38)天,切口脂肪液化率分别为2.33%和11.83%,切口感染率分别为2.33%和13.98%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组和对照组术后第3天疼痛评分分别为(7.06±1.75)分和(7.46±1.62)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组术后1个月瘢痕评分低于对照组,其中研究组和对照组温哥华疤痕评定量表评分分别为(4.73±2.13)分和(9.55±2.20)分,病人与观察者瘢痕评估量表评分分别为(12.54±4.32)分和(25.22±3.08)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 皮内缝合联合改良胸腔引流管置管应用于肺癌单孔腔镜肺叶切除术,有助于手术切口愈合,减轻病人术后疼痛,减少手术瘢痕的产生,提高术后美观程度。

关键词: 皮内缝合, 早期拔管, 肺癌, 单孔腔镜肺叶切除术, 切口愈合

Abstract: Objective To analyze the application effect of intradermal suturing combined with modified chest tube placement in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer and its impact on wound healing.Methods Clinical data of 222 lung cancer patients who underwent single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy at the Thoracic Surgery Department,Wuhan University People's Hospital Guanggu Branch between July 2020 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were sequentially assigned by admission time to the control group (n=93,interrupted sutures + conventional tube placement) and the study group (n=129,intradermal sutures + modified tube placement).Follow-up lasted 1 month postoperatively to compare wound healing,postoperative pain,and scar cosmesis.Results The unplanned extubation rates of thoracic tubes in the study group and the control group were 3.10% and 7.53% respectively,and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The postoperative catheter insertion time of the study group and the control group was (5.10±2.00) days and (6.80±1.72) days respectively,the postoperative hospital stay was (11.45±5.53) days and (13.91±6.82) days respectively,and the incision healing time was (6.81±2.51) days and (9.11±2.38) days respectively.The incision fat liquefaction rates were 2.33% and 11.83% respectively,and the incision infection rates were 2.33% and 13.98% respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).The pain scores of the study group and the control group on the 3rd day after surgery were (7.06±1.75) points and (7.46±1.62) points respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).One month after the operation,the scar score of the study group was lower than that of the control group.Among them,the Vancouver Scar Scale scores of the study group and the control group were (4.73±2.13) points and (9.55±2.20) points respectively,and the scar Scale scores of the patients and the observers were (12.54±4.32) points and (25.22±3.08) points respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion Intradermal suturing combined with modified chest tube placement facilitates wound healing,improves scar cosmesis,and enhances postoperative aesthetic outcomes in single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Key words: intradermal suture, early extubation, lung cancer, single-aperture thoracoscopic lobectomy, incision healing

[1] 王保凯 李欣焱 梁书斌. 肺癌小肠转移致肠套叠一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(2): 233-234.
[2] 汪志鹏, 俞杰, 陆祥, 黄飞, 陈卫荣. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术病人隐匿性淋巴结转移的风险预测模型构建及分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 50-53.
[3] 罗波, 伊力亚尔·艾尔肯, 仝梦婷, 赵翔, 艾山江·铁力瓦尔地. 沉默信息调节因子3在肺癌组织中的表达及其对肺癌细胞增殖、侵袭及迁移的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(1): 54-58.
[4] 周楚瑜 钟文昭. 非小细胞肺癌围术期治疗研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 933-937.
[5] 刘雪辉 张国超 黄宇菲 谭锋维. 非小细胞肺癌围手术期免疫治疗热点问题及研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 938-942.
[6] 王浩有 王伟 刘宏旭. 非小细胞肺癌新辅助免疫治疗的机遇与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 943-947.
[7] 杜宁彬 王居正 郭玲 胡艳正. 长链非编码RNA XIST和微小RNA-186-5p在非小细胞肺癌组织中的表达及其与病理特征的相关性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 953-957.
[8] 程辉 李樊 赵波. 非插管视频辅助胸腔镜手术在非小细胞肺癌中的应用进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(9): 1003-1006.
[9] 徐瑞鑫 王浩力 张文伟 边洪春. 三维电视胸腔镜肺段切除术采用吲哚菁绿荧光反染法治疗Ⅰ期肺癌病人的疗效及安全性观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 822-826.
[10] 黄志刚 张兴伟 张宇 邹青旭. N-乙酰转移酶10、丝氨酸羟甲基转移酶 2、YTHN6-甲基腺苷RNA结合蛋白1在肺癌组织中的表达及与临床病理特征、预后的相关性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 827-831.
[11] 牛磊 霍承瑜 刘宗志. 纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值、预后营养指数、系统性免疫炎症指数与肺癌胸腔镜肺叶切除术病人预后关系的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 708-.
[12] 梁志伟 辛鑫 余会敏. 长链非编码RNA GAS5和基质金属蛋白酶9在非小细胞肺癌病人血清中的表达及临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 498-502.
[13] 仇睿 刘阳 马波 吕志平 马云帆. 切除修复交叉互补族6-样表达与非小细胞肺癌临床病理特征的关系及其预后意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 266-270.
[14] 龚顺松 朱炎 董轼 蔡奕欣. 非小细胞肺癌中PROM2、RALY 和Rab15表达及预测发生骨转移的价值研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 271-274.
[15] 赵阳 徐伟力 李行星 方栋 周亮 王启伟 窦强兵. 髌下脂肪垫保留与否对膝关节骨性关节炎病人关节置换术后疼痛程度、切口愈合及功能恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 321-324.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[4] 林俊. 原发性中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤供者在器官移植中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[5] 胡善彪;余少杰;彭龙开. 婴幼儿供肾移植[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[6] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[7] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[8] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[9] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[10] 江帆;孙权;吴国俊;等. 不同引流方式对恶性梗阻性黄疸患者细胞免疫的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 760 .