临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 822-826.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20241967

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

三维电视胸腔镜肺段切除术采用吲哚菁绿荧光反染法治疗Ⅰ期肺癌病人的疗效及安全性观察

  

  1. 250000  山东济南,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院胸外科(徐瑞鑫),麻醉科(边洪春);济南市第四人民医院胸外科(王浩力、张文伟)
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-16 修回日期:2024-12-16 出版日期:2025-09-17 发布日期:2025-09-17
  • 通讯作者: 张文伟,Email:weidongcwd@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省医药卫生科技项目(202418001133);山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)校级教育教学改革研究项目(XM2023108)

Effect and safety of indocyanine green fluorescent staining method in 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic segment resection for stage Ⅰ lung cancer patients were observed

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,960th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force,Jinan 250000,China
  • Received:2024-12-16 Revised:2024-12-16 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-09-17

摘要: 目的 观察三维电视胸腔镜肺段切除术采用吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光反染法治疗Ⅰ期肺癌病人的疗效及安全性。方法 2022年5月~2024年9月收诊的Ⅰ期肺癌病人132例,均行三维电视胸腔镜肺段切除术,根据段间平面显露方法将其分成观察组(63例)和对照组(69例)。对照组采用改良膨胀萎陷法,观察组采用ICG荧光反染法。比较两组手术情况、肺功能、术后疼痛程度、生活质量及并发症。结果 观察组术后胸管留置时间、手术时间、术后住院时间、术后胸腔总引流量和段间平面显露时间分别为(2.13±0.37)天、(145.12±25.26)分钟、(5.21±0.95)天、(261.41±28.57)ml、和(9.15±1.73)秒,对照组分别为(3.29±0.48)天、(178.31±30.45)分钟、(6.34±1.36)天、(352.03±36.74)ml和(1651.28±179.84)秒,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量和术中淋巴结清扫数目比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术前、术后1个月,两组最大呼气流量(PEF)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV-1)及FEV-1/FVC水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后12小时、术后48小时、术后72小时视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分分别为(3.25±0.46)分、(2.13±0.35)分和(1.02±0.24)分,对照组分别为(4.11±0.59)分和(2.98±0.42)分和(1.73±0.30)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前、术后1个月,负性条目与正性条目评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组总并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 改良膨胀萎陷法及ICG荧光反染法三维电视胸腔镜肺段切除术对Ⅰ期肺癌病人肺功能、并发症无明显影响,二者均可改善生活质量,与改良膨胀萎陷法比较, ICG荧光反染法可缩短段间平面显露时间与手术时间,促进术后康复,减轻术后疼痛。

关键词: 吲哚菁绿荧光反染法, 三维电视胸腔镜肺段切除术, 改良膨胀萎陷法, Ⅰ期肺癌, 生活质量, 并发症, 肺功能

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy in patients with stage Ⅰ lung cancer treated with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence reverse-staining.Methods A total of 132 patients with stage Ⅰ lung cancer who were admitted from May 2022 to September 2024 all underwent three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic segmental resection of the lung. They were divided into the observation group (63 cases) and the control group (69 cases) according to the method of intersegmental plane exposure. The control group was treated with the modified expansion and collapse method, while the observation group was treated with the ICG fluorescence backstaining method. The surgical conditions, pulmonary function, postoperative pain degree, quality of life and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The postoperative chest tube retention time, surgical time, postoperative hospitalization time, total postoperative thoracic drainage volume,and inter-segmental plane exposure time in the observation group were as follows(2.13±0.37) d,(145.12±25.26) min,(5.21±0.95) d,(261.41±28.57) ml and (9.15±1.73) s,respectively.The data of the control groups were (3.29±0.48) d,(178.31±30.45) min,(6.34±1.36) d,(352.03±36.74) ml and (1 651.28±179.84) s,respectively.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative lymph node dissections between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the levels of maximal expiratory flow (PEF),forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV-1), and FEV-1/ forced vital capacity (FVC) between the two groups before the operation and one month after the operation (P>0.05).The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of the observation group at 12 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after the operation were (3.25±0.46) points, (2.13±0.35) points and (1.02±0.24) points respectively. The control groups were (4.11±0.59) points, (2.98±0.42) points, and (1.73±0.30) points,respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the scores of negative and positive items between the two groups before the operation and one month after the operation (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The modified dilatation collapse method and ICG fluorescence reverse staining method have no significant effects on lung function and complications in patients with stage Ⅰ lung cancer,and both can improve the quality of life.Compared with the modified dilatation collapse method,ICG fluorescence reverse staining method can shorten the plane exposure time between segments and the operation time,promote postoperative rehabilitation and alleviate postoperative pain.

Key words: indocyanine green fluorescence reverse staining method, 3D video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy, improved expansion collapse method, Stage Ⅰ lung cancer, quality of life, complications, lung function

[1] 邹裕海 刘雨 梁必雄. 术前呼吸道准备与术后引流量对食管癌胸腹腔镜根治术后肺部并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 841-845.
[2] 高鸿智 周博 王文斌. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜修补一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(8): 894-894.
[3] 张少武 胡飞 张牙. 腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前补片疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(7): 753-.
[4] 颜井伟 万广绪 邵佳明 王展翔 张元国. 乳腺癌病人输液港植入术后脱管风险影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(6): 611-614.
[5] 李文熙 郑鑫 孙宝信 张海生 朱志达 赵恩宏. 传统腹腔镜手术、经自然腔道取标本手术和经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌的效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(6): 632-636.
[6] 贠宇辉 姬翔 韩国梁 郭伟. 食管癌胸腔镜根治术中不同喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫对近期疗效、血清髓系细胞触发受体-1、肿瘤坏死因子受体相关蛋白-1水平及生存质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 482-485.
[7] 刘天鹏 陆世心 孟宪志. 无症状胆囊结石继发胆总管结石的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(5): 507-510.
[8] 汪明术. 基层医院腹股沟疝急诊手术入路选择及效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(4): 429-432.
[9] 王怡凤 华荣 何毅. 老年食管癌病人术后并发症Clavien-Dindo分级≥Ⅲ级的影响因素及列线图预测模型构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 261-266.
[10] 朱媛 余金 孙华朋 李晓刚 廖晓锋. 陈氏胰肠吻合在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中应用的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(3): 289-293.
[11] 陶琦 聂龙 王宜慧 王伟民 郑武. 铜离子电化学疗法与选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度痔的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(2): 183-186.
[12] 何雄威, 李皓桓. 2024欧洲运动创伤、膝关节外科与关节镜学会共识:疼痛退行性内翻膝关节周围截骨术的手术策略及并发症管理解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2025, 33(1): 57-58.
[13] 张念龙 李旭洋 杨云龙 彭昊 周建林. 手术时间对全膝关节置换术后病人影响的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(9): 998-1001.
[14] 王继超 薛军英 张建华 杨锦 王林佩. 改良全腔镜术对伴慢性肺部疾病食管癌病人肺功能、术后进食、并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 807-810.
[15] 徐业成 傅德良. 胰腺全切除术在胰腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 677-679.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[2] 孙金亚;陈伟;邓飞;等. 限制补液在胸外伤继发急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 862 .
[3] 许静涌;韦军民. 外科重症患者规范化营养支持与治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 892 .
[4] 赵文斌;凃峰;张晨等. 肱骨近端锁定钢板与近端锁定钢板联合内侧普通钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折合并中段骨折的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 359 -0 .
[5] 辛兢;郝在军. 多模式镇痛用于膝关节镜下交叉韧带重建术临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 384 -0 .
[6] 俞勇;吴世舫 . 三种术式联合治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎管狭窄的疗效分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 453 .
[7] 陈英;钟文昭. 第8版肺癌TNM分期浅析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 486 .
[8] 于振涛. 食管胃交界腺癌手术治疗现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 537 .
[9] 何启艇;邱波;龚明等. 踝关节炎治疗研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(8): 644 .
[10] 刘长建;刘昭. 静脉血栓栓塞的腔内治疗现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(8): 577 .