临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 585-588.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250052

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

三维打印技术辅助设计股前外侧穿支皮瓣联合负压封闭引流治疗手或足复合组织缺损的临床效果观察

  

  1. 261000   山东潍坊, 陆军第八十集团军医院骨科(安宝鑫、张永超、孙健、曲新强) ,麻醉科(杨淑怡)
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-03 修回日期:2025-01-03 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 曲新强,Email:exaw55@163.com

Observation of clinical efficacy of combined application of 3D printing assisted anterolateral thigh perforator flap and vacuum sealing drainage in treating hand or foot compound tissue defects

  1. Department of Orthopedics,the 80th Group Army Hospital of the People's Liberation Army,Shandong,Weifang 261000,China
  • Received:2025-01-03 Revised:2025-01-03 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-05-20

摘要: 目的 研究三维打印技术辅助设计的股前外侧穿支皮瓣与负压封闭引流(VSD)联合应用治疗手部或足部复合组织缺损的临床疗效。 方法2021年1月~2024年1月收治的手部或足部复合组织缺损病人104例,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和研究组,每组各52例。两组病人均在进行VSD治疗的基础上进行股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复术,对照组对缺损区域进行测量设计皮瓣,研究组采用三维打印技术辅助设计皮瓣。术后对病人的临床疗效、手或足功能[Michigan手功能评价量表(MHQ)、美国矫形足踝外科协会(AOFAS)、炎性因子水平[肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白细胞介素(IL)-8、IL-6]以及术后并发症进行分析。结果 对照组和研究组病人的临床疗效显著优于对照组,对照组和研究组的换药次数分别为(7.68±1.94)次和( 3.47±0.75)次,抗菌药物应用时间分别为(10.54±2.87 )天和( 6.24±1.74)天,创面愈合时间分别为(27.64±3.85)天和(19.64±2.91)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,对照组和研究组的TNF-α分别为(310.25±32.44 )ng/ml和( 257.64±26.87)ng/ml、IL-6分别为(1.07±0.11 )ng/ml和( 0.67±0.06)ng/ml,IL-8分别为(0.97±0.09 )ng/ml和(0.57±0.05)ng/ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组和研究组的MHQ评分分别为(66.87±7.71 )分和( 75.21±8.54)分,AOFAS评分分别为(74.58±8.57 )分和(88.31±9.71)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 应用三维打印技术辅助设计股前外侧穿支皮瓣并与负压封闭引流联合治疗手或足复合组织缺损可以有效的提高病人的临床效果,促进病人的恢复,并减少术后并发症的发生。

关键词: 三维打印技术, 股前外侧穿支皮瓣, 负压封闭引流, 复合组织缺损

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of combined application of 3D printing assisted anterolateral thigh perforator flap and vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in treating hand or foot compound tissue defects.Methods A total of 104 patients with hand or foot compound tissue defects admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024 were regarded as the study sample.They were randomly assigned into control group and research group (52 cases each) via random number table.Both groups underwent anterolateral thigh perforator flap on top of VSD treatment.The control group measured the defect area to design skin flap,while the research group used 3D printing technology to assist in designing the skin flap.After surgery,the efficacy,hand or foot function[Michigan Hand Function Assessment Scale(MHQ)、American orthopedic foot and ankle society(AOFAS)],inflammatory factor levels[Tumor Necrosis Factor-α(TNF-α)、Interleukin-8(IL-8)、Interleukin-6(IL-6)],and postoperative complications were analyzed.Results The research group had unusually better clinical efficacy,and unusually lower dressing changes[(7.68±1.94) vs (3.47±0.75)],duration of antibiotic use[(10.54±2.87)d vs (6.24±1.74)d],and wound healing time[(27.64±3.85)d vs (19.64±2.91)d] than control group (P<0.05).After surgery,research group had unusually lower level of the TNF-α[(310.25±32.44)ng/ml vs (257.64±26.87)ng/ml],IL-6[(1.07±0.11)ng/ml vs (0.67±0.06)ng/ml],and IL-8[(0.97±0.09)ng/ml vs (0.57±0.05)ng/ml],and unusually higher MHQ scores[(66.87±7.71) vs (75.21±8.54)] and AOFAS scores[(74.58±8.57) vs (88.31±9.71)] than the control group (P<0.05).The postoperative complications were not unusually different between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The combined application of 3D printing technology assisted anterolateral thigh perforator flap and VSD can effectively improve the clinical effect of patients with hand or foot compound tissue defects,promote their recovery,and reduce postoperative complications.

Key words: 3D printing technology, anterolateral thigh perforator flap, vacuum sealing drainage, compound tissue defects

[1] 涂林毅 黄成龙 张义 赵玥 俞凡 夏浩 俞立民 卢勇. 持续性负压封闭引流技术在肛瘘术后创面愈合中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2026, 34(4): 438-440.
[2] 肖敏锋 肖锦春 朱春平 陆曌. 负压封闭引流联合活性因子敷料及皮瓣转移术治疗Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨骨折的效果[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 854-857.
[3] 郭忠梁 刘元媛 刘应平 王静 徐敏 王国昌. 胸壁窦道病人应用富血小板血浆凝胶联合负压封闭引流的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 318-322.
[4] 沈华清 王东方 尹恩志 廖忆刘. 下肢严重开放性损伤创面修复的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 216-218.
[5] 练慧斌 主父中印 徐刚 周杰 罗艺 鞠海宾 殷志敏. 负压封闭引流技术对较大体表肿物美容缝合切口愈合质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(12): 1250-1253.
[6] 于锦利 陈顺革. 改良封闭负压引流术治疗肛瘘伴臀大肌脓肿一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 591-592.
[7] 张磊 段小亮 彭海军 魏兰. 负压封闭引流在胸壁结核病灶清除术后伤口愈合不良中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 749-751.
[8] 向锋 沈健 翁志勇. 负压封闭引流结合前臂皮瓣移植修复老年前臂及手部深度创面[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 783-785.
[9] 郭科委 朱勋兵 袁伶俐 韩俊柱 张仲传 徐文弟. 负压封闭引流技术联合银离子敷料治疗骨科感染性创面的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 189-192.
[10] 张广超 宋力 周树萍 胡智玉 宋德恩 杨涛 熊颖杰 陈佳 幸超峰 李士民 周明武. 膜诱导技术联合股前外侧穿支分叶嵌合组织瓣治疗肢体骨感染伴多处腔隙性创面[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1078-1081.
[11] 邱海军, 潘力生. 负压封闭引流技术联合自体游离皮片移植对下肢静脉性溃疡病人创面愈合及生活质量评分的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 188-190.
[12] 李潜 汪林宝 罗佩嘉 韦林 刘玉钢 任磊鹏 丁超. 负压封闭引流术联合创面冲洗在难愈性胸壁结核创面中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1141-1143.
[13] 李洋 钱松杰 普布顿珠 尼玛平措 旦增欧珠 索朗次仁 扎西平措巴桑普尺 王德国 张善兰. 海拔4000米以上高原地区应用负压封闭引流治疗开放性创伤后皮肤坏死[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1165-1166.
[14] 王维新, 王丹, 卢飞等. 改良负压封闭引流在重度污染创面治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 763-764.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[2] 陈凛;崔建新. 胃癌术后复发与再手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 813 .
[3] 杨钦;张再重;王烈. 空肠间置术在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 816 .
[4] 应敏刚;杨春康. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术并发症的防治策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 819 .
[5] 石汉平. 胃癌围手术期营养治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 821 .
[6] 吴川清;刘炜圳;帅晓明;等. 超声内镜在胃癌术前诊断中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 828 .
[7] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[8] 李晓辉;金太欣;邵永胜 . 升结肠回盲部肿瘤侵犯乙状结肠22例治疗体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 841 .
[9] 周振宇;汪路明;王一青;等. 肺部多发结节468例诊疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 865 .
[10] 张重捷;陈杰;邹奇;等. 两种微创手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 869 .