临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 592-595.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20241366

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

神经内镜下颅内血肿清除术与立体定向微创穿刺术治疗高血压性脑出血的疗效对比观察

何咏超 于志虎 张晓峰   

  1. 528415 广东中山,广东省中山市小榄人民医院(中山市第五人民医院)神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-16 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-20

Comparative observation on efficacy of neuroendoscopic intracranial hematoma evacuation and stereotactic minimally invasive puncture in treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

HE Yongchao,YU Zhihu,ZHANG Xiaofeng   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery,Xiaolan People’s Hospital of Zhongshan(Zhongshan Fifth People’s Hospital),Guangdong,Zhongshan 528415,China
  • Received:2024-08-16 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-20

摘要: 目的 比较神经内镜下颅内血肿清除术与立体定向微创穿刺术治疗高血压性脑出血的临床疗效。方法 2019年1月~2023年11月收治的高血压性脑出血病人111例,根据手术方法分为穿刺组(58例)和内镜组(53例),穿刺组采用立体定向微创穿刺术治疗,内镜组采用神经内镜手术治疗。比较两组围术期指标、生活活动能力、预后质量以及并发症发生情况。结果 内镜组和穿刺组手术时间分别为(90.19±20.18)分钟和(55.43±16.39)分钟,术中出血量分别为(102.55±29.58)ml 和(14.76±8.27)ml,血肿清除率分别为(95.98±5.50)% 和(72.16±6.97)%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术前ADL评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后两组ADL评分均上升,内镜组高于穿刺组[(81.59±9.34)分比(72.63±8.47)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。内镜组整体预后质量高于穿刺组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。内镜组并发症总发生率(5.66%)低于穿刺组(12.07%),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与立体定向微创穿刺术比较,神经内镜下颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血的疗效更好,其血肿清除率更高,预后更佳。

关键词: 立体定向微创穿刺术; 神经内镜; 高血压; 脑出血; 血肿清除率

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of neuroendoscopic intracranial hematoma evacuation and stereotactic minimally invasive puncture in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Methods A total of 111 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage admitted from January 2019 to November 2023 were divided into the puncture group(58 cases) and the endoscopy group(53 cases) according to the surgical method. The puncture group was treated with stereotactic minimally invasive puncture, and the endoscopy group was treated with neuroendoscopic surgery. The perioperative indicators, activity of daily living(ADL), prognosis quality, and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the endoscopy group and the puncture group was (90.19±20.18) minutes and (55.43±16.39) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss was (102.55±29.58)ml and (14.76±8.27)ml, and the hematoma evacuation rate was (95.98±5.50)% and (72.16±6.97)%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ADL score between the two groups before surgery(P>0.05). After surgery, the ADL scores of both groups increased, and the endoscopy group was higher than the puncture group [(81.59±9.34) points vs.(72.63±8.47) points], with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05). The overall prognosis quality of the endoscopy group was higher than that of the puncture group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The total complication rate of the endoscopy group(5.66%) was lower than that of the puncture group(12.07%), but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with stereotactic minimally invasive puncture, neuroendoscopic intracranial hematoma evacuation has better efficacy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, with higher hematoma evacuation rate and better prognosis.

Key words: modified minimally invasive stereotactic puncture;neuroendoscopy;hypertension;cerebral hemorrhage;hematoma clearance rate

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[2] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[3] 宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[4] 陈海滨;吕松岑. 全膝关节置换术术中止血药物的应用策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 800 .
[5] 危常鹏 . 原发性乳腺淋巴瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 806 .
[6] 程勇;秦加新 . 窦旁脑膜瘤的显微手术治疗分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 442 .
[7] 彭昊;张雷;廉凯等 . 膝骨性关节炎慢性疼痛的机制及其综合治疗进展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 476 .
[8] 陈晓燕;沈世强;张爱民等. 中肝叶肿瘤切除临床应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 908 .
[9] 崔龙. 便秘治疗的再认识 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 411 .
[10] 殷茜 张汝超 杨筱嵬等. 中电导钙激活钾离子通道在乳腺癌中的表达及其与临床病理指标的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 666 .