临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 962-967.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.10.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

创伤骨折病人深静脉血栓RAPT评分表的优化及其预测价值的验证分析 

  

  1. 442000 湖北十堰,湖北医药学院附属太和医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-02 接受日期:2022-11-02 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 通信作者:赵猛,Email:zmzm0655@163.com

Optimization of RAPT score for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with traumatic fracture and validation of its predictive value

  1. Department of Traumatic Orthopedics,Taihe Hospital,Huibei University of Medicine,Huibei,Shiyan 442000,China
  • Received:2022-11-02 Accepted:2022-11-02 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-20

摘要: 目的   通过优化完善传统RAPT评分表,提高血栓发病倾向的筛选精确度,为创伤骨折病人的血栓预防提供依据,从而选择高效的个体化抗凝方案。  方法   收集2021年1月~2021年12月我院收治出现静脉血栓栓塞症(venous thromboembolism,VTE)的创伤骨折病人150例为病例组(血栓组),随机选取同时间段未出现VTE的创伤骨折病人150例为对照组(非血栓组)。除收集传统RAPT评分表所含病史、年龄、医源性损伤及创伤程度四大类指标外,新增收集吸烟史饮酒史、血管内皮损伤性疾病、受伤至入院时间、术前是否采取预防性抗凝措施、上肢或下肢简单骨折、麻醉类型、是否急诊手术、血生化数据、D-二聚体动态数据。比较两组病人资料,使用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析筛选独立危险因素制定优化RAPT评分表。动态评估研究对象住院期间传统及优化RAPT评分数值。通过ROC曲线评估传统及优化RAPT评分表在创伤骨折血栓人群中的评价效能。   结果   单因素分析显示,两组人群吸烟史、受伤至入院时间、麻醉方式、VTE史、血管内皮损伤性疾病(糖尿病、 冠心病、高脂血症、脑血管疾病、下肢静脉曲张或动脉硬化闭塞症)、术前未使用预防性抗血栓措施、中心静脉置管等比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在加入年龄及性别因素进行分层后的Logistic回归分析显示,随着年龄的增加,具有吸烟史、糖尿病、脑血管病等病史的人群血栓的发病几率增加;具有吸烟史、糖尿病、高脂血症的男性群体及术前未预防性抗凝、上肢或下肢简单骨折的女性群体血栓发病风险增加。传统RAPT评分入院、术前、术后AUC分别为0.636 1、0.639 5、0.649 2;优化RAPT评分为0.806 4、0.806 7、0.803 1。  结论   本研究中优化RAPT评分表在入院、术前、术后对血栓的预测价值较传统RAPT评分均提高15%~17%,预测价值更高,较传统评分表更有利于及早发现血栓风险,及早处理。

关键词: 创伤, 骨折, 静脉血栓栓塞症, 回归分析, 风险评估模型

Abstract: Objective   By optimizing and improving the traditional RAPT score,the screening accuracy of thrombosis tendency is improved,and the relevant basis for thrombosis prevention in patients with early traumatic fracture is provided,so as to select an efficient individualized anticoagulation therapy.  Methods   The clinical data of 300 patients with traumatic fracture admitted to Shiyan Taihe Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.According to whether venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred during hospitalization,they were divided into thrombosis group(150 cases) and non-thrombosis group(150 cases).In addition to the four categories included in the traditional RAPT score,the history of smoking and drinking,diseases of vascular endothelial injury,time from injury to admission,preoperative prophylactic anticoagulation measures,upper limb fractures or simple lower limb fractures,type of anesthesia,emergency treatment,blood biochemical index,and dynamic data of D-dimer were also collected.The clinical data of the two groups were compared,and the independent risk factors were screened by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to formulate the optimized RAPT score.The traditional and optimized RAPT scores during hospitalization were dynamically evaluated.The ROC curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of traditional and optimized RAPT scores in the evaluation of traumatic fracture thrombosis.  Results    Single factor analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in smoking history, time from injury to admission, anesthesia method, VTE history, vascular endothelial injury diseases (diabetes, coronary heart disease, hyperlipidemia, cerebrovascular diseases, varicose veins of lower limbs or arteriosclerosis oblast), no use of preventive antithrombotic measures before surgery, and central venous catheterization (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis after adding age and gender factors showed that with the increase of age, people with smoking history, diabetes and cerebrovascular disease increased the incidence of thrombosis. Men with a history of smoking, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and women with pre-operative anticoagulation and simple upper or lower limb fractures are increased risk of thrombosis.The AUC of traditional RAPT score at admission,before operation and after operation were 0.636 1,0.639 5 and 0.649 2,respectively.The optimized RAPT scores were 0.806 4,0.806 7 and 0.803 1.  Conclusion   In this study,the predictive value of the optimized RAPT score for thrombosis at admission,before operation and after operation was 15%-17% higher than that of the traditional RAPT score.The optimized RAPT score has a higher predictive value and is more conducive to early detection of thrombosis risk and early treatment than the traditional score.

Key words: traumatic, fracture, venous thromboembolism, analysis of regression, risk assessment tool

[1] 朱新新 骆建军 王晓霞 蒋光伟 王黎鹏 郭起峰 孟威 邹春喜 杨箬箬 吴舒沁 吴倩. 床旁纤维支气管镜治疗对创伤性颅脑损伤合并肺部感染机械通气病人的临床影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 826-829.
[2] 胡家瑞 宋明 余来. 经皮微创与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 881-884.
[3] 王和杰 金旭红 邢势 卓泽铭. 老年GardenⅠ~Ⅱ型股骨颈骨折病人采用半髋关节置换与内固定治疗的近期价值比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 885-888.
[4] 秦俊 谭杨 陈廖斌. 生物型加长柄人工股骨头置换治疗高龄不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(8): 752-755.
[5] 李伟 邵佳佳 陈多军 马学山 许功效 鲁木. 尺骨茎突骨折及其分型对桡骨远端骨折术后疗效的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(8): 756-759.
[6] 王春秀 文蝶 陈艳丽. 多学科模式下全髋关节置换术围术期静脉血栓栓塞症防治策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(8): 760-762.
[7] 肖犇 李学军. 胫骨平台三柱骨折病人应用倒L入路联合外侧入路双钢板固定术治疗对其膝关节活动度的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 666-669.
[8] 赵树鹏 梁甲宁 李凡 孟磊 周祥 赵新利. 去骨瓣减压术后继发硬膜下积液54例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 550-552.
[9] 时雪亮 黄勤杰 陈慰慈 施超. 前哨淋巴结活检联合保乳术与改良根治术治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌的近远期疗效及对创伤后应激障碍的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 432-435.
[10] 黄俊 刘子林 季闯 周建林 方洪松 彭昊. 锁定钢板联合钢缆内固定治疗Vancouver B1型股骨假体周围骨折的临床疗效评价[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 312-315.
[11] 鲁顺立 吕豹 张宁. CT三维重建技术应用于骶髂关节前方钢板治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 317-320.
[12] 管国义 刘晨 陈家麟 郑龙龙. 联合入路手术治疗复杂过伸型胫骨平台骨折[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 326-329.
[13] 严凤翔. 辅助TriGen交锁髓内钉联合肩外展架治疗肱骨近端骨折临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 330-333.
[14] 叶铨秋 唐颖 岑仲然 鲁玫 陈俊杰. 体外膜肺氧合辅助胸部创伤气管断裂修补手术一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 241-242.
[15] 彭积贵 金忠文 颜海强 周旺 何昌进. 超声引导下与CT引导下肋骨骨折切开复位内固定术治疗肋骨骨折的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 283-286.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吉磊;王剑明. 胆囊癌肝切除范围的选择及其临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 472 .
[2] 姬乐 刘涛 白浪 高永涛. 腹腔镜远端胃癌D2根治术对老年进展期胃癌病人CEA、DDC及血清HIF1α、MACC1的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 739 -743 .
[3] 袁野 曹钧 蔡逊. 短疗程糖皮质激素对原发性胃癌病人术后并发症及炎性细胞因子的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 852 -854 .
[4] 曾锦威 江永发. 评估分析老年骨科病人手术后不良结果的相关风险因素[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 880 -882 .
[5] 汪翔, 卜星平, 吴小涛. 微创单侧入路双侧减压固定与开放双侧减压固定治疗单间隙腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 951 -954 .
[6] 徐一宏, 徐卫东. 人工髋关节假体材料及界面的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 271 -275 .
[7] 张海峰, 宋栋达, 刘荣. 达芬奇机器人右半肝切除技巧与经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 634 -637 .
[8] 付航玮, 陈平. 常见肝脏外科基础病变与肝再生[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 645 -648 .
[9] 严峻, 柏淳, 李锋, 傅文喜, 余小红. 经皮肝动脉化疗栓塞术联合索拉非尼治疗肝癌的疗效及安全性观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 668 -670 .
[10] 陈双, 周太成. 食管裂孔疝解剖学观点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 745 -747 .