临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 340-343.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.04.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不接触获取大隐静脉技术应用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床效果分析

  

  1. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院心脏大血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-10 接受日期:2022-08-10 出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 戚晓通,Email:qixiaotong2008@163.com

Clinical outcome of no-touch harvesting technique for the great saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu,Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2022-08-10 Accepted:2022-08-10 Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-04-25

摘要: 目的   评价不接触获取大隐静脉技术(no-touch saphenous vein grafting,NT-SVG)与传统获取大隐静脉技术(conventional saphenous vein grafting,CV-SVG)应用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的效果。  方法   2018年1月~2020年12月,应用NT-SVG或CV-SVG同期行CABG术的病人238例,NTSVG组112例,CV-SVG组126例。比较两种获取方式术后并发症和大隐静脉桥血管通畅情况。  结果   NT-SVG组术后3个月大隐静脉桥血管闭塞率为 2.5%,CV-SVG组为6.5%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),NT-SVG组术后12个月大隐静脉桥血管闭塞率为4.2%,CV-SVG组为9.0%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NT-SVG组和CV-SVG组术后30天内死亡率分别为0.9%和0.8%,二次开胸止血率分别为0.9% 和1.6%、心肌梗死率分别为0和0.8%,脑部并发症发生率分别为0.9%和0,肺部感染发生率分别为6.25%和6.3%,肾衰竭需要透析比例分别为1.8%和2.4%,消化道出血发生率分别为0.9%和1.6%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。NT-SVG组腿部伤口愈合延迟发生率7.1%,腿部皮肤感觉异常发生率18.8%,CV-SVG组分别为1.6%和9.5%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。  结论  NT-SVG组较CV-SVG组术后3个月和12个月大隐静脉桥通畅率明显提高,术后主要严重并发症无明显增加。

关键词: 冠状动脉旁路移植术, 不接触获取技术, 大隐静脉

Abstract: Objective   To evaluate the application effect of no-touch saphenous vein grafting(NT-SVG) versus conventional saphenous vein grafting(CV-SVG) in coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG).  Method   From January 2018 to December 2020,the clinical data of NT-SVG group(112 cases) and CV-SVG group(126 cases)  were retrospectively analyzed,and post-complications and patency of SVG were evaluated.  Result   Venous graft occlusion was 2.5% in the NT-SVG group and 6.5% in the CV-SVG group at 3 months postoperatively(P<0.05),and 4.2% versus 9.0% at 12 months,respectively(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of mortality(0.9% vs 0.8%),hemostasis rate of secondary thoracotomy(0.9% vs1.6%),myocardial infarction(0 vs0.8%),brain complications(0.9% vs 0),pulmonary infection(6.25% vs 6.3%),renal failure requiring dialysis(1.8% vs 2.4%),and gastrointestinal bleeding(0.9% vs 1.6%) between the two groups within 30 days after surgery(P>0.05).The incidence of delayed wound healing in the NT-SVG group was 7.1%,and paresthesia in the legs was 18.8%,which were higher than those in the CV-SVG group(1.6% and 9.5%,respectively,P<0.05).  Conclusion   Compared with the CV-SVG group,the patency rate of SVG was significantly improved in the NT-SVG group at 3 months and 12 months after the operation,and there was no significant increase in major postoperative complications.

Key words: coronary artery bypass grafting, no-touch harvesting technique, great saphenous vein

[1] 刘敬巍 王媛姗 池一凡 吴建涛 林明山 乔友进 黄强. 急性ST段抬高性心肌梗死不同手术时机的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1049-1052.
[2] 孙西龙, 罗佳佳, 吴志林. 超声引导腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞对单侧大隐静脉剥脱术术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 191-194.
[3] 魏凯, 王琪峰, 庞云峰. 体外循环与非循环冠状动脉旁路移植术对老年冠心病病人脏器损伤的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 508-511.
[4] 许万紫 曹海龙 王东进. 经左胸后外侧切口进行非体外循环下二次冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床运用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 842-844.
[5] 任宗力 王志维 邓宏平等. 非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术343例治疗体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(9): 653-655.
[6] 林松斌;王烈. 下肢静脉曲张微创手术的进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 895-897.
[7] 缪丙荣 . 心瓣膜置换术同期行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者长期预后的危险因素探讨 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(11): 785-786.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[2] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[3] 陈海滨;吕松岑. 全膝关节置换术术中止血药物的应用策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 800 .
[4] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[5] 方军;余阳;许涛;等. 小野寺营养预后指数在胃癌患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 831 .
[6] 刘鑫;金慧芳;张硕;等. 尿激酶治疗结核性包裹性胸腔积液不同时间后手术治疗的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 859 .
[7] 范强金;郑鹏超;李振军. 原发性肺软骨肉瘤病一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 320 .
[8] 赵文斌;凃峰;张晨等. 肱骨近端锁定钢板与近端锁定钢板联合内侧普通钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折合并中段骨折的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 359 -0 .
[9] 廖辰;姚壮凯. 腹腔间隔室综合征的诊疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 398 -0 .
[10] 韩辉;黄康博. 机器人手术在泌尿生殖系统肿瘤中的应用进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(1): 36 .