临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 977-980.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.11.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

股骨近端防旋髓内钉与解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效对比分析

  

  1. 北京,解放军第171医院骨科
  • 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20

Comparative analysis of proximal femoral nail and anatomical locking plate in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly 

  • Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20

摘要: 目的:探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)与解剖型锁定钢板(ALP)治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:2012年1月~2014年5月收治的不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折病人140例,依据内固定方法不同分为两组,PFNA组(62例)病人行PFNA内固定治疗,ALP组(78例)病人行ALP内固定治疗。比较两组病人相关围手术期指标和术后疗效、并发症情况。结果:两组病人均顺利完成手术,未出现术中意外情况。术后共6例出现肺部感染(PFNA组2例,ALP组4例),4例出现下肢静脉血栓(两组各2例),均经对症治疗后治愈。PFNA组病人的手术时间显少于ALP组,术中出血量明显低于ALP组,切口长度短于ALP组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PFNA组病人术后的尖顶距短于ALP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组的颈干角比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组病人术后均获随访,随访时间为16~24个月。PFNA组病人的负重时间和骨折愈合时间,均短于ALP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访期内,ALP组出现2例髋内翻畸形,4例股骨头颈切割;PFNA组则未发生内固定断裂或松动、股骨头颈切割及髋内翻畸形等并发症。依据术后6个月的Harris评分,PFNA组的优良率为93.5%,ALP组为92.3%,两组比较差异统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在股骨粗隆间骨折的内固定手术治疗中,PFNA的创伤更小、出血量更少,固定牢靠,更有利于骨折愈合和早期负重锻炼。但在总体疗效方面,PFNA与ALP均可取得较好的效果,在临床应用中,可根据病人骨折的实际情况酌情选择合适的治疗方法。

关键词: 股骨粗隆间骨折, 解剖型锁定钢板, 股骨近端防旋髓内钉

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti rotation intramedullary nail(PFNA)and anatomic locking plate(ALP)in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 140 cases of patients with femoral instability since January 2012~2014 year in May were intertrochanteric fracture,internal fixation according to different methods,they were divided into PFNA group(PFNA internal fixation,62 cases)and ALP group(ALP internal fixation,78 cases).The perioperative indicators of the two groups were compared and the effects and complications were observed and compared.Results:Two groups of patients were successfully completed the operation,did not appear in the accident.There were 6 cases of pulmonary infection after operation(2 cases of group PFNA,4 cases in group ALP),4 cases of lower limb vein thrombosis(2 cases in each group),all of which were cured after symptomatic treatment.Perioperative index comparison,the operation time of group PFNA were significantly less than group ALP,the amount of bleeding was significantly lower than that of group ALP,incision length was significantly shorter than the group ALP,there were significant differences(P<0.05).Group PFNA of patients after the tip apex distance was significantly shorter than the group ALP patients(P<0.05);but the two groups the collodiaphyseal angle of comparison,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).All the two groups were followed up for 16~24 months.Comparison of postoperative recovery,the patients in the group PFNA load time and fracture healing time were significantly shorter than the group ALP(P<0.05);the time of followup,group ALP of 2 cases of hip varus deformity,4 cases of femoral neck cut;a case of fracture fixation or loosening,femoral neck cut and coxa vara complication there was not happened in the group PFNA.According to the Harris score at 6 〖LM〗months after operation,the efficacy of the two groups,the excellent rate of group PFNA was 93.5%,and there was no significant difference with the group ALP(92.3%)(P>0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with internal fixation,PFNA has less trauma,less bleeding,firm fixation,more conducive to fracture healing and early weight bearing exercise.But in the overall efficacy,PFNA and ALP can achieve good results in clinical applications,according to the actual situation of patients with fracture,as appropriate,to choose the appropriate treatment method.

Key words: intertrochanteric fracture, anatomical locking plate, proximal femoral nail anti rotation intramedullary nail

[1] 陈森, 方洪松, 金志辉, 彭昊. 抗骨质疏松治疗在老年粗隆间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内钉术后病人中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 433-435.
[2] 陈金, 王光勇, 肖宁等. 大粗隆式股骨柄与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗高龄不稳定粗隆间骨折的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 981-983.
[3] 赵灏, 陈世宏, 黄旭平. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗不稳定性老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 962-964.
[4] 李勇 刘延雄. 骨质疏松股骨粗隆间骨折的股骨近端防旋髓内钉固定手术的效果与安全性评价[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 789-791.
[5] 邱波 宋其合 钟俊 汪喆 彭飞. 两种不同内固定在老年股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(6): 430-430.
[6] 刘继超 余勤武 张铁华. 非骨科牵引床闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(11): 831-831.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 目录[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 829 .
[2] 钱永尚, 余铃, 杨东风, 肖松, 李建东, 程晓锋. 微创经皮钢板接骨术与传统开放手术用于治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 904 -906 .
[3] 孙展, 韩斐, 罗凡砚, 陈育斌. 杂交手术治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 925 -927 .
[4] 孟庆友, 赵彬. 复杂腹主动脉夹层动脉瘤腔内治疗的现状及进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 928 -930 .
[5] 卢晨, 杨鹏, 黄尧, 刘宇, 胡佳. 多层血流调节器治疗主动脉夹层术后远端残余夹层的临床经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 931 -934 .
[6] 丁帅, 马先桃, 程才. 杂交技术在Stanford A型主动脉夹层的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 935 -937 .
[7] 方坤, 罗明尧, 赵嘉伟, 薛云飞, 舒畅. 3D导航技术在主动脉腔内修复术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 938 -942 .
[8] 顾建军, 刘杰, 薛正龙, 陈立华 . 一站式杂交手术治疗 Stanford A型主动脉夹层的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 943 -945 .
[9] 吴建涛, 王家富, 池一凡等. 心血管外科术后胸部切口愈合不良高危因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 946 -949 .
[10] 吴满仓, 李志强, 吴东妮等. 乳腺非特殊类型浸润性癌1721例检出趋势及分布特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 950 -952 .