临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 973-976.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.11.016

• • 上一篇    下一篇

旋后外旋型Ⅲ、Ⅳ度踝关节骨折行经腓骨入路与后外侧入路治疗效果及安全性比较

  

  1. 南京,东南大学附属中大医院江北院区(南京市大厂医院)
  • 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of transfibular approach and posterolateral approach in the treatment of Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree ankle fractures with retrorotational external rotation

  • Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20

摘要: 目的:探讨旋后外旋型Ⅲ、Ⅳ度踝关节骨折行经腓骨入路与后外侧入路的治疗效果及安全性。方法:2017年3月~2018年2月收治的踝关节骨折病人69例,依据LaugeHansen 分型标准均达到旋后外旋型Ⅲ~Ⅳ度。按照随机对照试验(RCT)原则进行肯德尔系数单盲随机分组,A组35例,经腓骨入路行钢板螺钉固定;B组34例,经后外侧入路行钢板螺钉固定。比较两组临床手术指标(手术时间、术中出血量、骨愈合时间、住院时间)及相关并发症,随访12个月评价踝关节愈合情况。结果:A组手术时间为(113.78±11.79)分钟,术中出血量为(251.97±36.87)ml、住院时间(18.57±2.17)天,B组分别为(109.87±12.31)分钟,(266.04±37.19)ml和(17.96±2.01)天,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),B组骨愈合时间为(51.57±6.18)天,A组为(59.68±7.54)天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组术后1、3、6、12个月不同时间段AOFAS踝与后足功能评分分别为(40.59±6.29)分,(64.08±6.68)分,(79.84±7.14)分和(92.87±5.58)分,恢复优良率为93.75%,A组分别为(32.15±5.17分,(53.77±5.19)分,(64.87±6.68)分,(83.47±5.09)分和74.19%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组4例术后切口感染,4例骨愈合后行走仍旧伴有踝关节疼痛感;B组仅1例切口感染。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经腓骨入路或后外侧入路手术治疗旋后外旋型Ⅲ、Ⅳ度踝关节骨折均有良好效果,其中后外侧入路方式更具优势,可缩短骨愈合周期,保障踝关节稳定性,促进踝关节功能恢复。

关键词: 旋后外旋型, 踝关节骨折, 腓骨入路, 后外侧入路

Abstract: Objective:To study the effect and safety of the transfibula approach and the posterior lateral approach in the treatment of the fracture of the ankle and the posterior lateral approach.Methods:69 patients with ankle fracture were selected from March 2017 to February 2018 in our hospital.According to the criteria of LaugeHansen classification,all of them reached the grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ of posterior circumflex type.According to(RCT)undefineds principle of randomized controlled trial,35 patients in group A were treated with plate screw fixation through fibula approach,34 patients in group B were treated with plate screw fixation through posterolateral approach,and 35 patients in group A were treated with plate screw fixation via posterolateral approach.The clinical operative indexes(operative time,intraoperative bleeding,bone healing time,hospitalization days)and related complications were compared between the two groups.The ankle joint healing was evaluated after 12 months followup.Results:The operative time of group A was(113.78±11.79)min,the intraoperative blood loss was(251.97±36.87)ml,the number of days of hospitalization was(18.57±2.17)d and while the data in group B was (109.87±12.31)min,(266.04±37.19)ml,(17.96±2.01)d,respectively,there was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The bonehealing time of group B was(51.57±6.18)d,which was significantly shorter than that of group A[(59.68±7.54)d)],the difference was significant(P<0.05).The functional scores of AOFAS(40.59±6.29,64.08±6.68,79.84±7.14,92.87±5.58)and the rate of recovery(93.75%)were significantly higher in group B than in group A(32.15±5.17,53.77±5.19,64.87±6.68,83.47±5.09,74.19%).The difference was significant(P<0.05).In group A,4 cases of postoperative incision infection,4 cases of bone union still had an ankle joint pain,and only 1 incision infection in group B.There was a significant 〖LM〗difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion“” Transperoneal approach or posterolateral approach has a good effect on the treatment of Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree ankle fractures,and the posterolateral approach has more advantages,which can shorten the cycle of bone healing and guarantee the stability of ankle joint,and the posterior lateral approach has the advantages of shortening the cycle of bone healing and ensuring the stability of ankle joint.To promote the recovery of ankle function.

Key words: postspin type, ankle fracture, fibula approach, posterior lateral approach

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 目录[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 829 .
[2] 钱永尚, 余铃, 杨东风, 肖松, 李建东, 程晓锋. 微创经皮钢板接骨术与传统开放手术用于治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 904 -906 .
[3] 孙展, 韩斐, 罗凡砚, 陈育斌. 杂交手术治疗Stanford A型主动脉夹层的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 925 -927 .
[4] 孟庆友, 赵彬. 复杂腹主动脉夹层动脉瘤腔内治疗的现状及进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 928 -930 .
[5] 卢晨, 杨鹏, 黄尧, 刘宇, 胡佳. 多层血流调节器治疗主动脉夹层术后远端残余夹层的临床经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 931 -934 .
[6] 丁帅, 马先桃, 程才. 杂交技术在Stanford A型主动脉夹层的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 935 -937 .
[7] 方坤, 罗明尧, 赵嘉伟, 薛云飞, 舒畅. 3D导航技术在主动脉腔内修复术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 938 -942 .
[8] 顾建军, 刘杰, 薛正龙, 陈立华 . 一站式杂交手术治疗 Stanford A型主动脉夹层的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 943 -945 .
[9] 吴建涛, 王家富, 池一凡等. 心血管外科术后胸部切口愈合不良高危因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 946 -949 .
[10] 吴满仓, 李志强, 吴东妮等. 乳腺非特殊类型浸润性癌1721例检出趋势及分布特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 950 -952 .