临床外科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 920-921.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10056483.2018.12.009

• • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾根部结扎与Hem-o-lok夹闭的对比研究

  

  1. 江西省宜春市人民医院普外一科
  • 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-20

Comparison study of ligation and Hem-o-lok in securing of appendix stump in laparoscopic appendectomy

  • Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-20

摘要: 目的:探讨阑尾根部结扎在腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)中的应用价值。方法:2016 年6月~2017年12月因急性阑尾炎行LA 105例,采用两种不同方法处理阑尾残端,53例阑尾根部行丝线结扎,52例用Hemolok夹闭阑尾根部,比较两组手术时间和术后恢复情况。结果:两组术后并发症、术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结扎组手术时间(55.5±7.8)分钟,Hemolok组(46.1±5.6)分钟;结扎组阑尾根部处理费用0.3元,Hemolok组560元。两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:两种处理阑尾残端的方法均安全、有效,但结扎组手术费用较少。Hemolok夹闭阑尾根部节省手术时间,操作简单,更适合于初学者。

关键词: 阑尾根部, 腹腔镜阑尾切除术, Hem-o-lok

Abstract: Objective〖WTBZ〗〓To compare ligation and Hemolok in securing of appendix stump in laparoscopic  appendectomy.〖WTHZ〗Methods〖WTBZ〗〓There were 105 patients undergoing  laparoscopic appendectomy.They were treated by two different methods in securing of the base of the appendix:silk ligation of the stump was performed in 53 cases(ligation group); while stump ligation by using Hemolok clips was performed in 52 cases(Hemlock group).Two groups were compared in operation time and postoperative patient recovery.〖WTHZ〗Results〖WTBZ〗〓Between the both groups,postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences(P>0.05).The operation time of the ligation group was (55.5±7.8)min,which was significantly longer than that of the Hemolok group[(46.1±5.6)min,(P<0.05)].The cost of appendix root treatment in the ligation group was 0.3 yuan,while the cost in Hemolok group was 560 yuan.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖WTBZ〗〓Both methods are safe and effective in securing of the base of the appendix in laparoscopic appendectomy.Pursestring suture is more in line with traditional appendectomy requirements and cost effective,but requiring more skilled laparoscopic manipulation.Hemolok clipping of the appendix saves operation time and is easy to perform,which is more suitable for beginners.

[1] 魏晓平;田大广;胡明道等. 经脐上缘单孔腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 858-859.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[4] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[5] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[6] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[7] 周观金;彭昊;陈森. 全膝关节置换治疗膝关节炎术后早期镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[8] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[9] 金鑫;周鹏;赵文超;等. 肾脏混合性上皮间质肿瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 785 .
[10] 方军;余阳;许涛;等. 小野寺营养预后指数在胃癌患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 831 .