JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 62-66.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.01.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of transanal mucosal flap displacement and transanal intersphincterotomy on the treatment of complex anal fistulas and their influence on the pressure of anorectal canal

  

  1. Department of General Surgery,Chinese Medicine Gezhouba Central Hospital,Hubei,Yichang 443000,China
  • Received:2023-03-11 Accepted:2023-03-11 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-01-20

Abstract: Objective   To explore the effect of Endoanal advancement flap (ERAF) and transanal opening of interphincteric space (TROPIS) in the treatment of complex anal fistula and their impact on anorectal pressure,so as to provide a reference for clinical selection of surgical methods.Methods   Eighty-four patients with complex anal fistula admitted from October 2018 to October 2022 were divided into group E received ERAF treatment (n=48) and group T received TROPIS treatment (n=36).The clinical efficacy,operation,wound surface and anorectal pressure of the two groups were compared.Results   The effective rate of treatment in Group T was 97.22%,which was higher than that in Group E(87.50%),with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).The surgical time [(31.53±7.29) minutes],intraoperative bleeding volume [(29.56±7.37) ml],and wound area [(10.03±0.96) cm2,(8.76±0.87) cm2,(6.20±0.77) cm2] on the day of surgery,7 and 14 days after surgery in Group T were all smaller than those in Group E[(35.36±8.54)min,(36.86±8.04)ml,(12.09±1.23)cm2,(10.52±1.09)cm2 and(7.36±0.85)cm2] (P<0.05).After surgery,the VAS score and Wexner incontinence score of Group T were (1.38±0.27) and (0.21±0.08),respectively.Group E was (1.56±0.29) and (0.33±0.09),respectively.In group T, the anorectal systolic pressure at 20mm and 30mm and the anorectal resting pressure at 20mm and 30mm were(138.18±29.58) mmHg,(136.22±35.41) mmHg,(35.47±6.58) mmHg,and (32.97±8.01) mmHg,respectively.In Group E, the data was (152.78±31.53) mmHg,(156.29±32.74) mmHg,(38.29±7.62) mmHg and (36.41±7.63) mmHg,respectively.Both groups showed a decrease in score and anorectal pressure,and group T was lower than group E (P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in Group E was 20.83% ,which was higher than that in Group T(11.11%),but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion   TROPIS has a better effect in the treatment of complex anal fistula,which can shorten the operation time,reduce intraoperative bleeding,reduce postoperative pain,and protect anal function.

Key words: endoanal advancement flap, transanal opening of intersphincteric space, complex anal fistula, rectum, anal canal

[1] CHEN Hao, HOU Xiaotao, CHEN Yanni, ZHANG Rui, MA Qiyao, ZHANG Bo. Observation on the curative effect of transanal opening of intersphincteric space in the treatment of complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(11): 1072-1075.
[2] GUO jia, ZHU Chuanxiang, HE Wei. Feasibility study about ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract with endorectal advancement flap in the treatment of high complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(1): 74-76.
[3] XU Hongpeng, LEI Xiaomei, HU Min.. Influence of different kinds of LIFT on clinical efficacy for short-term and anal function of patients with complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 69-72.
[4] LU Linyuan, CAO Yongqing, ZHANG Qiang, et al.. Effect of videoscope-assisted surgery on the symptoms and prognosis in patients with complex anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(12): 1041-1043.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!