JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 192-195.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20250378

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficacy and safety analysis ofcholedochoscopic dual-frequency dual-pulse laser lithotripsy in the treatment of postoperative biliary residual stones

  

  1. Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350025,China
  • Received:2025-04-11 Accepted:2025-04-11 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-02-25

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of choledochoscopic dual-frequency dual-pulse(DFDP) laser lithotripsy for the treatment of postoperative biliary tract stone remnants.Methods A total of 112 patients with residual stones after biliary tract surgery admitted from August 2014 to December 2022 were divided into two groups according to treatment modalities.The observation group (n=63) received choledochoscopic DFDP laser lithotripsy,while the control group (n=49) underwent conventional basket extraction.We compared stone clearance rates,complications,perioperative indicators,and surgical outcomes between the two groups.ResultsThe stone extraction rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(95.2% vs.73.5% ,P<0.05),and the difference was statistically significant.Compared with the control group,the observation group had fewer average stone removals(two times vs three times,P<0.05)and shorter average operation time(22.8 min vs.24.1 min,P<0.05).The postoperative gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) level of the observation group was lower than that of the control group(63 U/L vs.109.0 U/L,95%CI:-63~-9,P<0.05),and the degree of postoperative GGT reduction in the observation group was greater than that in the control group(-40.8 U/L vs.-28.0 U/L,95%CI:-23.5~-0.8,P<0.05),the differences were both statistically significant.The observation group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in complication rate compared to control group(1.6% vs.14.2%,P<0.05).Conclusion DFDP laser lithotripsy under choledochoscopy for the treatment of residual stones after biliary surgery has the advantages of high efficiency,safety and convenience.

Key words: dual-frequency dual-pulse laser, choledochoscopy, postoperative biliary residual stones, lithotripsy

[1] . Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and transurethral ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary calculi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(9): 985-987.
[2] DENG Yuanyuan, WU Sheng, XIANG Congming. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous ureteral flexible holmium laser lithotripsy and single ureteral flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of complex kidney stones [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(8): 875-878.
[3] GAO Xiang, ZHANG Hongbo, ZHANG Dakun, ZHENG Han, GAO Jiyuan, MENG Qiang, ZHANG Lang, GUO Tingxiu. Analysis of the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary tract stones of different sizes and locations [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 523-526.
[4] LIU Yunfeng,SUN Yaping,LI Bingcheng,FENG Yuanfa,CAO Manchao,WANG Fengyao. Predictive value of serum Netrin-1 and connective tissue growth factor levels for renal injury after ureteral flexible lithotripsy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(3): 314-317.
[5] YE Linpeng, PENG Ejun, LV Yuan. Effect of Qijin mixture on residual stone rate and stone recurrence in patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(7): 677-680.
[6] GU Jie, LI Dujian, LI Quan, et al. A nomogram model of systemic immune inflammation index for predicting the occurrence of urosepsis after upper urinary calculi surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(5): 470-474.
[7] YIN Jincheng, LIU Hongxin, GU Yanqing, et al. Effect of ureteroscopic lithotripsy on renal function and inflammatory factors in patients with renal stones with diameter of 2-3cm [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(2): 133-136.
[8] LIU Jiehao, MAO Changqing, HU Heping. Clinical study of a kind of dual-channel ureteroscopy for treatment of upper ureteral calculi in children [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 684-686.
[9] YUAN Haichao, WANG Yan, HU Yimin, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of negative pressure suction sheath lithotripte for incarcerated ureteral calculi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 118-120.
[10] . Application of minimally invasive laparoscopic technique in the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(4): 396-398.
[11] . Analysis of curative effect and prognosis of two suture methods of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stone patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(2): 181-183.
[12] HUANG Zhiqiang, LI Hu, MA Nan, et al.. Effect of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy on lower-calyx calculi and the level of procalcitonin,C reactive protein and IL-6 levels in patients with lower-calyx calculi of elderly patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(11): 1068-1070.
[13] JIANG Shaohua, LU Xiaojun, FENG Wenqiang, et al. Application of low rate and low energy of holmium laser combined with ureteral catheter drainage in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(1): 61-63.
[14] XIONG Bobo, ZHANG Jinsong, LI Ning, et al.. Efficacy and prognosis of flexible cystoscopy combined with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complicated renal calculi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(7): 678-681.
[15] . Predictive factor analysis for predicting flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treating single kidney stone [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 578-580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 760 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 764 .