JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 507-510.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240286

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of risk factors for common bile duct stones secondary to asymptomatic cholecystolithiasis

  

  1. Department of Minimally Invasive Biliary Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Heilongjiang,Harbin 150001,China
  • Received:2024-03-03 Accepted:2024-03-03 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-20

Abstract: Objective To explore the risk factors of asymptomatic gallbladder stones secondary to common bile duct stones.Methods  A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of asymptomatic gallstone patients diagnosed by the physical examination center of our hospital from January 2019 to October 2021,as well as asymptomatic gallstone patients with secondary common bile duct stones admitted to the hospital.According to whether secondary common bile duct stones occurred,the patients were divided into two groups.Among them,134 patients with asymptomatic gallbladder stones were the control group.There were 150 cases of common bile duct stones secondary to asymptomatic gallbladder stones,which were the observation group.The differences in baseline data between the two studies were balanced by propensity match scoring.The relevant data were compared and analyzed.Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS 26.0 software and R software.Results  There was no statistical significance in the distribution of age,gender,BMI index,smoking,drinking,exercise,hypertension and diabetes between the two groups (P>0.05).The comparison of clinical indicators between groups showed that the number of gallbladder stones (multiple),the maximum diameter of stones (≥ 10mm),and the diameter of the common bile duct may be related to asymptomatic gallbladder stones secondary to common bile duct stones,with pvalues all less than 0.05 and statistically significant differences.There were statistically significant differences in the number of gallbladder stones (multiple),the maximum diameter of the stones (≥10mm),and the diameter of the common bile duct (P<0.05).Youdaoplaceholder0 Logistic Multivariate regression analysis showed that OR of the maximum diameter of the stone was 0.362(0.181-0.725),which was a protective factor for common bile duct stones secondary to asymptomatic gallbladder stones,and OR of the common bile duct diameter was 2.076(1.571-2.743),which was a risk factor for common bile duct stones secondary to asymptomatic gallbladder stones.Conclusion  Asymptomatic gallbladder stones secondary to common bile duct stones are the result of multiple factors working together.

Key words: asymptomatic gallstones, choledocholithiasis, risk factors, complications

[1] PENG Xiaozhuang, ZHANG Xiaomin. Analysis of risk factors for early acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 503-506.
[2] WANG Gang, BAI Xiarui, LIANG Jiao, NAN Ligang. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative gastrointestinal disorders in patients craniocerebral injury [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 511-513.
[3] WANG Mingshu. Selection and effect analysis of emergency surgical approach for inguinal hernia in primary hospital [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(4): 429-432.
[4] WANG Yifeng,HUA Rong,HE Yi. Influencing factors of postoperative complications of elderly patients with esophageal cancer with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥Ⅲ and construction of nomogram prediction model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 261-266.
[5] ZHU Yuan,YU Jin,SUN Huapeng,LI Xiaogang,LIAO Xiaofeng. Observation of therapeutic effects of Chen's pancreatojejunostomy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(3): 289-293.
[6] ZHANG Nianlong,LI Xuyang,YANG Yunlong,PENG Hao,ZHOU Jianlin. Research progress on the influence of operative time on patients after total knee arthroplasty [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(9): 998-1001.
[7] FENG Nan, LIN Hongqian, GUO Yijin, WANG Yajiao. Analysis of risk factors for prognosis in patients with esophageal signet ring cell carcinoma and construction of a nomogram prediction model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 712-715.
[8] WANG Qing, CHEN Lili, LIU Yupeng. Establishment and application of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 716-720.
[9] LIANG Shengkai,XIE Lei,LI Yao,LIU Jia,WANG Xin,LIU Guofeng,ZHANG Fengqi. The influencing factors of lower limb deep vein thrombosis after closed Pilon fracture surgery and the construction of risk prediction nomogram model [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 653-656.
[10] XU Zheng, LU Zilong, XIA Liming. The influence of different surgical methods on the treatment effect of female unilateral cT1N0-1a thyroid cancer and the satisfaction of incision beauty [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(5): 481-483.
[11] YAN Changlin, SUN Xingwei, ZHAO Lu. Construction of a nomogram model for personalized prediction of anal fistula occurrence after incision and drainage of perianal abscess [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(5): 517-520.
[12] ZHU Tongzhou*, SUN Qiang,SHAO Qian,WANG Qian.. Risk factors of knee joint stiffness after arthroscopic MIPPO for tibial plateau fracture [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(4): 350-353.
[13] TAN Chenglong,ZHAO Qingguo,SUN Siwei. Analysis of influencing factors and construction of nomogram model of soft tissue complications after closed calcaneal fractures [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(4): 355-358.
[14] XIANG Yue,CHEN Dejie. A research of the current status and influencing factors of postoperative lateral lymph node recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(3): 248-251.
[15] JIANG Zhiyang, CAN Haile, TANG Yafen, LI Xiaogang, LIAO Xiaofeng. Construction and verification of dynamic prognosis graph of gallbladder cancer patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(2): 182-187.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 813 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 816 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 812 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 826 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 867 .