JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 454-457.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20251037

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application value of MR-TRUS image artificial intelligence fusion in assisting prostate biopsy for prostate cancer screening

GUO Xiaoyang,RUAN Yuan,LI Jinyan,ZHOU Hongyong,CHEN Li,HU Zihao,KE Wei   

  1. *Department of Urology Surgery,Renmin Hospital of Wuxue,Hubei Province,Huanggang 435540,China
  • Received:2025-10-31 Online:2026-06-08 Published:2026-06-08

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical application value of MR-TRUS image artificial intelligence (AI) fusion-assisted prostate biopsy in prostate cancer screening.Methods This study enrolled 212 prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate biopsy at our hospital from January 2023 to May 2025.They were randomly divided into a fusion group (106 cases,using Venus ultrasound with MR-TRUS image AI fusion guidance) and a traditional group (106 cases,using conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance).The following parameters were compared between the two groups:biopsy positive rate,false-negative rate,detection rate of tumors with different Gleason scores (GS),number of biopsy cores,targeting error,and incidence of postoperative complications (rectal bleeding,urinary tract infection,urinary retention).Results The biopsy positive rate of fusion group was 62.26% (66/106),significantly higher than 43.40% (46/106) in the traditional group (P<0.01).The false-negative rate in the fusion group was 1.89% (2/106),significantly lower than 9.43% (10/106) the traditional group (P<0.01).In the fusion group,the detection rates for tumors with GS≤6、GS=7and GS≥8 26.42%、29.24%and 6.60%,respectively.In the traditional group,these rates were 18.87%、16.98%and 7.55%,respectively.The difference in detection rate for low-to-intermediate-risk differentiated adenocarcinoma was statistically significant (P<0.01).The fusion group had a lower average number of biopsy cores (7.9±1.2) compared to the traditional group (13.2±1.6) (P<0.05) and a smaller targeting error [(1.1±0.3)mm VS (4.0±0.8)mm](P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the fusion group was 5.66% (6/106),lower than the 19.81% (21/106) in the traditional group (P<0.05).Conclusion MR-TRUS image AI fusion can improve the detection rate of low-to-intermediate-risk differentiated prostate cancer,reduce the prostate cancer missed diagnosis rate,and decrease biopsy-related trauma and complications.

Key words: prostate cancer, MR-TRUS image fusion, artificial intelligence, aspiration biopsy

[1] LI Wen*,ZHANG Zhoujing,SUN Dawei. Breaking the deadlock in thyroid cancer diagnosis and treatment:A new paradigm of artificial intelligence in clinical application [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2026, 34(3): 249-252.
[2] ZHANG Fan,YIN Supeng,YANG Zeyu. Artificial intelligence in ultrasonographic diagnosis of thyroid and cervical lymph nodes:current status,challenges,and future perspectives [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2026, 34(3): 253-257.
[3] GAO Zhenghong,XU Bo,CAI Wensong. Applicationstatus of ultrasonic elastography and AI-assisted diagnosis in active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2026, 34(3): 258-261.
[4] . Advances in robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary nodules [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(9): 922-927.
[5] ZHAO Zihan, HUANG Lan, LIU Weicheng, TONG Jingjing, QIAN Qun. Advances in the research of constipation [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(8): 884-886.
[6] ZOU Nanxin, NIU Shaoxi, XIONG Yiwen, AO Liyan, CHEN Ziwei, SONG Jialong, LIU Yachao, LI Jin, ZHANG Xu. Clinical study of 123I labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand for prostate biopsy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(5): 527-530.
[7] HE Xiongwei, LI Haohuan. Application of artificial intelligence in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: technical progress, challenges, and future prospects [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(4): 438-441.
[8] LI Jinqiao, WANG Baojun. Advances in in surgical techniques for prostate cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(2): 200-203.
[9] LI Xian Miao, Yirixiatijiang·Amier, WU Huan Lei, HU Jia. Current status and development of clinical drug research for prostate cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2025, 33(2): 204-207.
[10] YUE Min, LUAN Yang, RUAN Yajun, HAO Xiaodong, PENG Hao. Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy and associated complications of perineal versus transrectal prostate biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 753-756.
[11] YAO Xuan, Liu Bo, WANG Li, et al. Clinical features of incidental prostate cancer (report of 9 cases) [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(4): 380-382.
[12] TANG Wangqin, LV Xiaoqing, WANG Jieyu, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer progression [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 881-884.
[13] JI Jintao, KANG Bo, SUYansheng. Correlation analysis of PSMA with Gleason score and its value in early diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 885-888.
[14] LIU Guolu, LI Qiang, LI Qian, et al. Relationship between circulating miR-485-5p and pathological parameters in patients with prostate cancer and its prognostic value [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 673-676.
[15] JI Jintao, KANG Bo, SU Yansheng. Relationship between prostate specific membrane antigen expression and clinicopathological features in prostate cancer patients and its prognostic value [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 130-133.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!