JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 148-152.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Predictive value of urinary exosomal miR-29c in clinical outcomes of organ-and non-organ-confined bladder urothelial carcinoma

  

  1. Department of Urology,Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital,Shaanxi,Xi’an 710068,China
  • Received:2023-03-02 Revised:2023-03-02 Accepted:2023-03-02 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-02-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate the predictive value of urinary exosomal microRNA(miR)-29c in the clinical outcome of organ- and non-organ-confined bladder urothelial carcinoma(BUC).Methods From January 2017 to March 2022,152 patients with BUC were recruited from the Department of Urology in our hospital as a validation set.In addition,126 non-cancer controls were selected from the physical examination center of our hospital.The expression level of urinary exosomal miR-29c was detected by real-time quantitative PCR.Results In the validation set,urinary exosomal miR-29c level in BUC patients was significantly lower than that in non-cancer control group(P<0.05),while urinary exosomal miR-17-5p level and miR-590-5p level were not significantly different(P>0.05).The area under ROC curve of urinary exosomal miR-29c for the diagnosis of BUC was 0.969(95%CI:0.953~0.986),and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 92.1% and 90.2%,respectively.In subtype analysis,urinary exosomal miR-29c levels were further reduced in patients with non-organ-confined BUC compared with patients with organ-confined BUC(P=0.009).Overall survival(OS),disease-free survival(DFS) and disease-specific survival(DSS) were longer in the urinary exosomal miR-29c high expression group(P<0.05).Conclusion Low levels of urinary exosomal miR-29c are an adverse prognostic factor for survival in patients with BUC,and are promising as a predictor of adverse clinical outcomes of organ-and non-organ-confined BUC.

Key words: urinary exosomal miR-29c, organ-and non-organ-confined bladder urothelial carcinoma, clinical outcome

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 865 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 879 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 882 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 885 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 847 .