JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1057-1060.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.11.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Expression of ARHGAP4 and FBLN5 in gastric cancer tissues and the relationship with patient prognosis

  

  1. Department of General Surgery Ward 1, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital,Hebei,Shijiazhuang 050000,China
  • Received:2022-12-29 Revised:2022-12-29 Accepted:2022-12-29 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate the correlation of fibulin 5(FBLN5) and Rho GTPase activating protein 4(ARHGAP4) in gastric cancer tissues and their relationship with the prognosis of patients.Methods One hundred gastric cancer patients admitted to the Department of General Surgery of Shijiazhuang First Hospital were selected for the study,and gastric cancer tissues >1cm from the tumor margin and paracancerous tissues 5cm from the tumor margin were collected.Retrospective analysis of the relationship between FBLN5 and ARHGAP4 expression profiles and clinicopathological indices of gastric cancer,as well as their effects on survival,was performed with univariate and Cox regression analyses of the patients’ clinical data.Immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the expression of FBLN5 and ARHGAP4.The relationship between the expression levels of different FBLN5 and ARHGAP4 and the survival time of patients.Results The positive expression rate of ARHGAP4 was lower than that of paracancerent tissues,and the positive expression rate of FBLN5 was higher than that of paracancerent tissues(P<0.05).ARHGAP4 expression was associated with tumor site,Lauren’s staging,lymph node metastasis,TNM stage,differentiation degree,CE,CA19-9,CA125,and immune score(P<0.05);FBLN5 expression was associated with Lauren’s staging,lymph node metastasis,TNM stage,differentiation degree,CE,CA19-9,CA125,and immune score(P<0.05);Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 3-year cumulative survival rate of FBLN5 positive group was,which was lower than that of negative group(P=0.044).The 3-year cumulative survival rate of ARHGAP4 positive patients was higher than that of negative patients(P=0.021).Cox results showed that positive ARHGAP4 was protective factor for survival(P<0.05).Conclusion The prognosis of patients in the FBLN5-positive group is worse than that in the negative group,high expression of FBLN5 is a risk factor for survival,and the prognosis of patients with ARHGAP4 negative group is better than that in the positive group,which are closely related to the development and prognosis of gastric cancer patients.

Key words: gastric cancer, fibulin 5, Rho GTPase activating protein 4, clinicopathological features

[1] LI Yibo, SONG Yanyang. Effect analysis of different anastomotic methods in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy on patients with gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(9): 865-868.
[2] ZHANG Mingran, FAN Yue, LI jun. Clinical characteristics of 11 cases of Petersen hernia after gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract with gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(9): 877-880.
[3] MA Lidong, LIU Xiaolei, ZHAO Fei. Study on the mechanism of artemisinin regulating the growth of gastric cancer cells and the secretion of inflammatory factors through the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(8): 738-741.
[4] LIU Yu, SUI Chao, TAO Liang, WANG Meng. Research progress of prolonged postoperative Ileus after gastrointestinal surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(7): 698-700.
[5] XU Hui, LI Hao, QIN Jingjing, et al. The value of preoperative plasma fibrinogen as a prognostic index in patients with non metastatic gastric cancer:a Meta-analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(4): 348-352.
[6] LI Bin, YANG Dong, ZHOU Changqing. Effect of apatinib combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion and intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases and transformation [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(3): 256-260.
[7] LIU Jiong, WANG Xiangfei, JIANG Bin. Evaluation of the efficacy of different Uncut Roux-en-y surgical approaches in patients with gastric cancer and the impact on their test indicators and prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(2): 177-180.
[8] Dabusilite, ZHENG Hao, HAN Chengxin. Correlation of BRD4 expression level in colorectal cancer tissue with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(10): 949-953.
[9] MO Bo, WANG Pei, TONG Yixin, et al. Analysis of the effects of membrane anatomy in radical resection of gastric cancer on reducing complications [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 835-838.
[10] XUE Zhiyou, NI Zhihai, ZHANG Yi. Relationship between the expression of retinoid acid receptor related orphan receptorα and microtubuleassociated protein light chain 3 in gastric cancer and long-term prognosi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 839-843.
[11] PENG Qiwang, DENG Hao, LI Wei. Construction and analysis of early postoperative recurrence risk prediction model for gastric cancer patients based on LncRNA expression [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 848-851.
[12] SONG Yongshu. Tolerance of early oral nutrition in elderly patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 852-855.
[13] GONG Youhong, WU Yanlie. Application of complete 3D laparoscopic modified π-shaped esophagojejunostomy in radical total gastrectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 649-652.
[14] LI Zongfu, CHEN Tieliang, DING Mei, et al. Analysis of the effect of rapid rehabilitation surgery on the nutritional status of patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted pyloric sparing gastrectomy for early gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 433-436.
[15] CHENG Liang, WU Xianfeng, ZHOU Encheng, et al. The expression of PTEN phosphorylation in gastric cancer and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 353-356.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 794 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 813 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 875 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 878 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 912 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 319 .