JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1179-1182.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.12.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influencing factors and prevention of proximal femoral shortening(PFS) after intertrochanteric fracture

  

  1. Department of Orthopedics,92nd Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force,Hunan,Hengyang 421002,China
  • Received:2021-12-15 Accepted:2021-12-15 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-20

Abstract: Objective To retrospectively analyze the incidence and influencing factors of proximal femoral shortening after intertrochanteric fracture surgery. Methods The clinical data of 97 patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated from January 2017 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 31 cases with the dynamic hip screw(DHS),41 cases with the proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA),25 cases with Intertan.They were divided into normal group(59 cases) and PFS group(38 cases) according to the shortening of proximal femur after operation.The differences of age,gender,body mass index(BMI),bone mineral density,fracture type,internal fixation method,reduction quality,TAD value and complete weight-bearing time between the two groups were observed.Results In this group,the proportion of proximal femoral shortening was 38/97(39.18%).In PFS group,the shortening of femoral neck main screw was (5.43±1.72)mm,including 2 cases(2.06%) with internal fixation penetrating the femoral head and 5 cases(5.14%) with nonunion; The proportion of type Ⅲ and type Ⅳ fractures in the normal group was 40.68%,and that in the PFS group was 76.32%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The proportion of PFNA /Intertan was 76.27% in the normal group and 65.79% in the PFS group(P<0.05).There were 26 cases of positive reduction,18 cases of neutral support and 15 cases of negative support in the normal group,while there were 8 cases,13 cases and 17 cases in the PFS group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The complete weight-bearing time of normal group was (8.54±2.37)weeks,which was significantly later than that of PFS group(4.15±1.83)weeks(P<0.001).Conclusions  Internal fixation,reduction quality and complete weight-bearing time were important factors affecting the proximal femoral shortening after intertrochanteric fracture.

Key words: intertrochanteric fracture, internal fixation, proximal femoral shortening

[1] QIN Ping, CHEN Ken, TAO Qilin, et al. Therapeutic effect of three surgical positions on traumatic intertrochanteric fracture of femur [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 666-669.
[2] LU Bin, Liang Lizhuo. Surgical indexes of artificial femoral head replacement for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly and changes in bone mineral density and hip function [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 193-195.
[3] XIONG Yunchuan, LI Qian, LIU Chang, et al. Effect of erector spinal plane block on analgesia and postoperative recovery of lumbar spine decompression and fusion internal fixation operation [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(12): 1191-1194.
[4] . The comparative analysis of Anatomic clavicular plate and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of distal clavicular fracture [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(4): 328-331.
[5] SHAO Jiajia, LI Yingquan, XU Gongxiao.. Clinical effect of arthroscopic double-row anchored suture bridge technique in the treatment of simple humeral greater tubercle avulsion fractures [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(3): 282-286.
[6] TIAN Hailin, LU Jin, SHEN Yang.. Effect analysis of different fixation methods in the treatment of complex tibial plateau fracture [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(4): 326-330.
[7] PANG Zhengqu, LI Feng, ZHAHG Xiuchun.. Effect of the degeneration of paraspinal muscles on postoperative clinical efficacy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis treated by short decompression and fusion [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(4): 334-337.
[8] LIU Huijun, DING Maoqian, REN Shisong.. Study on the clinical application of MIPPO technology combined with locking compression plate internal fixation in patients with limb fracture trauma and its effect on quality of life [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 78-81.
[9] . The efficacy of postsurgery antiosteoporosis treatment on elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(5): 433-435.
[10] . Clinical observation of patella concentrator combined with hollow screw in the treatment of comminuted patellar fracture [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(2): 158-159.
[11] . Comparative analysis of proximal femoral nail and anatomical locking plate in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly  [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(11): 977-980.
[12] . Clinical observation of greater trochanter femoral stem and proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(11): 981-983.
[13] . Clinical analysis of the proximal femoral nail in treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture with elderly patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(12): 962-964.
[14] LIU Haifeng, ZHAO Xiaoqiang, PAN Feilong. Effect of rehabilitation training intervention on the prognosis of tibial plateau fracture patients treated by internal fixation [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(11): 874-877.
[15] LI Yong, LIU Yanxiong. A study of the efficacy and safety evaluation of proximal femoral nail anti rotation fixation for osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 789-791.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 785 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 841 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 910 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 903 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 926 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 245 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 257 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 270 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 276 - 276 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 299 - 299 .