JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1120-1122.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.12.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the efficacy of stepwise decompression with intracranial pressure monitoring combined with different timing of skull defect repair in patients with sTBI and the effect on their serum indicators and prognosis

  

  1. Department of Trauma Surgery,Hai'an People's Hospital,Jiangsu,Nantong 226600,China
  • Received:2022-05-10 Accepted:2022-05-10 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-20

Abstract: [Abstract] Objective To investigate the efficacy of stepwise decompression with intracranial pressure monitoring combined with different timing of skull defect repair in patients with sTBI and the effect on their serum indicators and prognosis. Methods Seventy-three patients with STBI who were admitted to our hospital were selected for the study.They were divided into 2 groups according to the differences in treatment modalities.Among them,40 patients in the study group were treated with intracranial pressure monitoring step decompression combined with ultra-early skull defect repair,while 33 patients in the control group were treated with intracranial pressure monitoring step decompression combined with conventional time skull defect repair,comparing the clinical efficacy and other differences between the two groups. Results After treatment,the rate of good recovery was significantly higher in the study group than in the control patients(P<0.05);All inflammation-related test indexes in the study group improved significantly after treatment compared with the control group(P<0.05);After treatment,the incidence of complications was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group(P<0.05).The mean MCA flow velocity in the study group improved significantly after treatment compared with the control group(P<0.05).After treatment,the prognosis of the study group was significantly better than that of the control patients(P<0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of intracranial pressure monitoring step decompression combined with ultra-early skull defect repair in the treatment of patients with heavy craniocerebral injury is remarkable,and it can reduce the inflammatory state of patients and improve their cerebral perfusion,and reduce the incidence of complications.

Key words: intracranial pressure monitoring step decompression, ultra-early skull defect repair, heavy craniocerebral injury, efficacy, serum, prognosis

[1] XUE Zhiyou, NI Zhihai, ZHANG Yi. Relationship between the expression of retinoid acid receptor related orphan receptorα and microtubuleassociated protein light chain 3 in gastric cancer and long-term prognosi [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 839-843.
[2] JI Jintao, KANG Bo, SUYansheng. Correlation analysis of PSMA with Gleason score and its value in early diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(9): 885-888.
[3] YUAN Ye, LIU Tao, LIU Hua. Relationship between the expression levels of microRNA-138 and microRNA-145 and Th1/Th2 drift and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(8): 744-748.
[4] LUO Yaobing, YANG Wujun, WANG Xingping, et al. Effect of stepped decompression under intracranial pressure monitoring on inflammatory response,metabolic status and prognosis of patients with emergency craniocerebral trauma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 640-643.
[5] LIU Guolu, LI Qiang, LI Qian, et al. Relationship between circulating miR-485-5p and pathological parameters in patients with prostate cancer and its prognostic value [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 673-676.
[6] YUAN Zhao, ZHENG Ang. Analysis of clinical efficacy hemodynamic indexes and prognosis of laparoscopic splenectomy and EVLS therapy in the treatment ofportal hypertension patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 691-693.
[7] XUE Cheng, MA Jun. Serum expression levels of miR-448-3p and KLF5 in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms and their clinical significance [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(6): 565-568.
[8] ZHANG Zhihong, LI Yanyang, LI Kejia, et al. Efficacy evaluation and strategy analysis of open and laparoscopic hepatectomy for complicated hepatolithiasis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(6): 572-575.
[9] LI Zongfu, CHEN Tieliang, DING Mei, et al. Analysis of the effect of rapid rehabilitation surgery on the nutritional status of patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted pyloric sparing gastrectomy for early gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 433-436.
[10] RUAN Tian, LI Changsheng, YANG Zetian, et al. The effect of visceral pleural invasion on the survival of postoperative patients with stage ⅢA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer:SEER database analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 448-452.
[11] YE Bin, XIANG Qiu, JIN Wenjie. Expression of forkhead box Q1 and CyclinD1 in non-small cell lung cancer and their relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 453-458.
[12] BIAN Chunan, TIAN Xiaoqi, LIN Chaoyu, et al. Differentiated expression and clinical significance of crystallin-alpha B in lung squamous cell carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 486-489.
[13] YANG Heng, ZHANG Jun, GUO Qiang, et al. The potential value of HLA-DPB1 in lung adenocarcinoma was analyzed based on multi-database [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 339-344.
[14] JIN Yi , WANG Xinyi, DU Runsen, et al. Decreased expression of hsa-mir-337 predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 345-348.
[15] WANG Pengyuan, SHANG Yichao, ZHENG Duo, et al. Prognostic analysis of pelvis and ureteral carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 368-371.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 320 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(2): 85 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(4): 245 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(4): 255 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(4): 292 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(4): 301 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(5): 335 .