JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 535-538.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.06.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the application of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block during high ligation of hernia sac

  

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,Hanchuan People's Hospital,Hubei,Xiaogan 431600
  • Received:2022-10-20 Accepted:2022-10-20 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-20

Abstract: Objective To observe the analgesic effect and safety of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in high ligation of hernia sac under ultrasonography guided transversus abdominis plane block.Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 133 children with inguinal hernia admitted to our hospital from March 2018 to March 2020.Nerve block drugs were divided into two groups:ropivacaine group(RP group) and levobupivacaine group(LB group),with 62 cases in RP group and 71 cases in LB group.Clinical indexes,analgesic effect(FLACC) and safety were compared.Results There were no significant differences in extubation time,recovery time and hospitalization time between the two groups(P>0.05),and the dosage of remifentanil in LB group was significantly lower than that in RP group(P<0.05).The FLACC score at T1 was significantly higher than that at T0,T2 and T3(P<0.05).The FLACC scores of LB group at T1 and T2 were significantly lower than those of RP group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The ultrasonic guided ropivacaine or levobupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block had good analgesic effect in the high ligation of children's hernia sac.The analgesic effect of levobupivacaine was stronger than that of ropivacaine,both are equally safe.

Key words: high ligation of hernia sac, transversus abdominis plane block, Ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, analgesic effect

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(4): 301 .
[2] . The effect of axillary lymph node status on the prognosis of patients with recurrence after breast conserving surgery[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(9): 769 -772 .
[3] LONG Linsheng, ZHENG Huifeng, PENG Hao.. Progress in the diagnosis and treatment of the instability of the distal radioulnar joint[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(10): 919 -921 .
[4] CHEN Lin, DONG Hanhua, CHEN Qi, et al. Standardized procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy-Tongji university experience[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 5 -7 .
[5] ZHANG Tao, SUN Bei. Clinical practice guidelines for NCCN pancreatic cancer(V2 edition) updated in 2019[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 8 -11 .
[6] TANG Jianxiong, LI Hangyu. Interpretation of Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of inguinalhernia in the elderly (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 12 -15 .
[7] WANG Wenqiang, ZHANG Erlei, XIANG Shuai, et al. Pulse-first continuous blockade technique: a new strategy for the resection of giant hepatic hemangioma[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 16 -18 .
[8] JIA Weidong, LIU Wenbin. Interpretation of multidisciplinary expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of hepatic hemangioma (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 19 -22 .
[9] CHEN Zhiyu, BIE Ping. Expert consensus on the application of choledochostomy in hepatolithiasis (2019 edition)[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 23 -26 .
[10] LIN Jinna, LIU Qiang. Clinical practice guidelines of NCCN breast cancer updated in 2019: new advances in local treatment of breast cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 27 -30 .