JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 44-50.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.01.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of prognostic factors and construction of prognostic models for mucinous breast cancer

  

  1. Department of Thyroid,Breast and Vascular Surgery,Xijing Hospital,the Fourth Military Medical University,127 Changle West Road,Shanxi,Xi’an 710036, China
  • Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-01-20

Abstract: Objective  To analysize pathological character and prognosis factors of Chinese and American MBC patients,and constructing a nomogram for forecasting 3-year,5-year and 8-year overall survival(OS).
Methods  The clinical data of 5 671 MBC patients diagnosed from 2007 to 2012 were extracted from SEER database,which was assigned to modeling set.A retrospective analysis was performed on 101 MBC cases from Xijing hospital in China from 2004 to 2012,which was assigned to validation set.The clinical baseline characteristics of patients in modeling set and validation set were compared,and the independent risk factors for the overall survival(OS) were screened by Cox equal proportional regression model.Based on the results of multiple regression analysis of the modeling set Cox model,the nomogram models for predicting the OS were constructed.the reliability of the predictions obtained from the models were evaluated by C-index,ROC curve and calibration curve.Finally,the clinical benefit and application value of the model were evaluated by clinical decision curve analysis(DCA).
Results  There were no significant difference in the baseline characteristic between the patients in modeling set and validation set except age,surgery,whether first primary tumor,T stage,chemotherapy and radiotherapy.The results of analysis showed that age,surgery,radiation,T stage and M stage were independent risk factors for OS in MBC patients.Based on the above variables,the nomogram models were constructed and evaluated.The C-index of model in modeling set was 0.87,The C-index of model in validation set was 0.71,and the C-index of model for internal validation was 0.81.Moreover,the ROC curve analysis showed that prediction model had a relatively high accuracy and the calibration curve analysis showed that model predicted OS had a good consistency with the actual observed values.Finally,the clinical decision curve analysis showed that model can bring clinical benefit.
Conclusion  A nomogram can accurately predict the prognosis of MBC patients in China and provide scientific basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Key words: mucinous breast cancer, prognosis, nomogram, prediction model

[1] LI Zongfu, CHEN Tieliang, DING Mei, et al. Analysis of the effect of rapid rehabilitation surgery on the nutritional status of patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted pyloric sparing gastrectomy for early gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 433-436.
[2] RUAN Tian, LI Changsheng, YANG Zetian, et al. The effect of visceral pleural invasion on the survival of postoperative patients with stage ⅢA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer:SEER database analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 448-452.
[3] YE Bin, XIANG Qiu, JIN Wenjie. Expression of forkhead box Q1 and CyclinD1 in non-small cell lung cancer and their relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 453-458.
[4] BIAN Chunan, TIAN Xiaoqi, LIN Chaoyu, et al. Differentiated expression and clinical significance of crystallin-alpha B in lung squamous cell carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 486-489.
[5] YANG Heng, ZHANG Jun, GUO Qiang, et al. The potential value of HLA-DPB1 in lung adenocarcinoma was analyzed based on multi-database [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 339-344.
[6] JIN Yi , WANG Xinyi, DU Runsen, et al. Decreased expression of hsa-mir-337 predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 345-348.
[7] WANG Pengyuan, SHANG Yichao, ZHENG Duo, et al. Prognostic analysis of pelvis and ureteral carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 368-371.
[8] LU Kaijin, SHEN Jiangfeng, JIA Weiguang. Effect of thoracoscopic modified recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer and its effect on patient prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 257-260.
[9] SHEN Jian, LI Minzhe, DU Yanfu. Effect of central obesity on clinical efficacy of laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 261-265.
[10] LI Yuzhu, XIA Lianjie. Expression of Dickkopfrelated protein 2 in cancer tissues of patients with bladder cancer and its correlation with prognosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 280-283.
[11] JI Jintao, KANG Bo, SU Yansheng. Relationship between prostate specific membrane antigen expression and clinicopathological features in prostate cancer patients and its prognostic value [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 130-133.
[12] LI Yunlong, DU Zhenghua, ZHANG Huimin, et al. Clinical treatment and prognostic analysis of gastrointestinal pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 166-170.
[13] GUAN Yan, HE Linyu, LUO Yin. Construction and validation of risk prediction model for infectious complications after hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 182-185.
[14] SUN Zheng, QUE Haifeng, LOU Jian, et al.. Prognostic significance of nutritional risk index in stage Ⅳ gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(1): 58-61.
[15] LI Weixin, GUI Yaoting, WANG Song, et al.. Comparison of S.T.O.N.E.Guy’s stone score and CROES Nephrolithometry Nomogram in predicting stone clearance status of percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(1): 74-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 756 .