JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 943-946.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.10.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture for gastric tube in endoscopic esophagectomy

  

  1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiac Great Vascular Surgery,Taihe Hospital,Hubei University of Medicine,Shiyan 442000,China
  • Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-10-20

Abstract: Objective To explore the advantages of continuous suture for gastric tube in endoscopic esophagectomy in shortening the operation time and reducing the postoperative drainage fluid,and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the suture method.
Methods 70 patients with endoscopic esophagectomy from January 2017 and July 2017 in our hospital for treatment were divided into two groups.35 patients with continuous suture for gastric tube were control group,thirty-five patients with interrupted suture for gastric tube were observation.The effect and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed between the two groups.
Results All of the patients were successfully operated.The time of making gastric tube in control group[(9.17±1.51)min] was reduced compared with the observation group[(17.40±1.14)min,P<0.05].Meanwhile,the control group had an advantage over the observation group in the operative time[(162.60±8.61)min,(165.51±7.82)min,P>0.05] and the postoperative drainage fluid[(175.43±70.89)ml,(216.57±94.15)ml,P<0.05].However,there were no significant differences in length and width of the gastric tube,the intraoperative blood loss,gastric juice on the first postoperative day,gastric juice color change time on the postoperative,chylothorax,hoarseness,lung infection,anastomotic fistula and hospitalization time after surgery(P>0.05).
Conclusion The application of continuous suture for endoscopic esophageal carcinoma of gastric tube can decrease the time of making tubular stomach and surgery,and the duration of thoracic on the first postoperative day.It is safe and feasible for suture of gastric tube.

Key words: esophageal carcinoma, suture, endoscopic surgery, tubular stomach

[1] YUAN Jun, LI Yin, PENG Yinjie, et al.. Prognostic value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(7): 627-630.
[2] . The application of biodegradable polyglycolic acid gasket in thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 548-550.
[3] . Clinical application of treatment in primary suture of common bile duct after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 560-562.
[4] GAO Chongqing, WANG Gangcheng, LIU Yingjun, et al.. Longitudinal trapezoidal flap spiral suture prevents the ureter dermal nipple atrophy and collapse in 15 cases [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 91-93.
[5] . A clinical comparative study:tibial avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament fixation through decussate nonabsorbable suture versus cannulated screw under arthroscopic [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(9): 788-790.
[6] DU Jingli, GUO Qingsen, ZHENG Maohuang, et al.. Comparative clinical study of different surgical methods for minimally invasive common bile duct stone extraction [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(8): 664-667.
[7] . Preoperative influencing factors analysis of thoracic midupper esophageal carcinoma with cervical lymph node Metastasis  [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(7): 566-569.
[8] ZHANG Lei, SUN Yu, HUANG Yi.. Comparison of postoperative sphincter fistula ligation and incision and suture for postoperative pain,anal function and wound healing time of sphincter anal fistula [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.
[9] YI Tao, CAO Rongge.. Clinical application of silicone rubber negative pressure suction ball in Type Ⅲ wounds in emergency laparotomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(10): 882-885.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 892 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 914 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 273 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 320 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(7): 521 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(7): 566 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(8): 596 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(11): 823 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(8): 625 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(9): 695 .