JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 558-561.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.07.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of long term efficacy and prognostic factors of advanced esophageal cancer after minimally invasive esophagectomy

  

  • Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-20

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the longterm efficacy and prognostic factors of minimally invasive esophagectomy of advanced esophageal cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 128 cases of advanced esophageal cancer minimally invasive esophagectomy were collected.The outcome measures included treatment,postoperative pathology,follow-up and prognostic factors.Onefactor analysis was conducted by χ2 test.The influencing factors of P<0.05 in Onefactor analysis were further included into cox regression model for multifactor analysis.Results:128 patients successfully completed the operation,and none of them were converted to open.The operation time of 128 patients was(287±61)min,and the intraoperative blood loss was(134±181)ml.The number of lymph node dissection in 128 patients was(21±8)per case,all of which were R0 resection;tumor diameter was(4.5±2.3)cm;The 5year overall survival rate of 128 patients was 24.2%,and the progressionfree survival rate was 18.0%.Univariate analysis showed that age,N stage,M stage and TNM stage were related factors affecting the 5year overall survival rate of postoperative minimally invasive esophagectomy;also,affecting 5year progressionfree survival rate.Multivariate analysis showed that N stage,M stage and TNM stage were independent influencing factors of 5year overall survival rate and progressionfree survival rate after minimally invasive esophagectomy of advanced esophageal cancer.Conclusion:The longterm results of minimally invasive esophagectomy of advanced esophageal cancer are satisfactory.The tumor N stage,M stage and TNM stage are independent factors affecting the overall survival rate and progressionfree survival rate of postoperative patients.

Key words: advanced esophageal cancer, minimally invasive esophagectomy, longterm efficacy, prognostic factors

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(6): 476 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(7): 562 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(11): 812 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(12): 895 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2017, 25(12): 958 .
[6] . Benign or low grade malignant pancreatic lesions:comparison analysis of clinical efficacy in central pancreatectomy versus distal pancreatectomy[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(12): 936 -939 .
[7] . Analysis of the risk factors of periprosthetic fracture after hip replacement[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(2): 163 -165 .
[8] . Evaluation on diagnosis and treatment of nonpuerperal mastitis[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(3): 201 -203 .
[9] LI Yong, GAO Shuming, LIU Guangfei, et al.. Clinical value of knee arthroscopy combined with sodium hyaluronate in early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(4): 309 -312 .
[10] XU Liang, LIU Fengying, DING Qian.. The changes of Caprini score,D-D and FIB levels in post-fracture DVT patients and their diagnostic significance[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(4): 328 -330 .