临床外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 369-372.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20260145

• 专家笔谈 • 上一篇    下一篇

跟骨骨折经皮微创治疗的临床实践:挑战与质量控制

龙承 陈建民 张晓 王聪杨 邓淑华 高谱   

  1. 410000湖南长沙,湖南省人民医院(湖南师范大学附属第一医院)骨科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-28 出版日期:2026-06-08 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 陈建民,Email:20583218@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2026年度湖南省自然科学基金项目(2026JJ80955)

Minimally invasive calcaneal fracture reconstruction:clinical challenges and quality control

LONG Cheng,CHEN Jianmin,ZHANG Xiao,WANG Congyang,DENG Shuhua,GAO Pu   

  1. Department of Orthopaedics,Hunan Provincial People's Hospital,Changsha 410000,China
  • Received:2026-02-28 Online:2026-06-08 Published:2026-06-08

摘要: 跟骨骨折是足部最常见的骨折类型,其中约75%为累及距下关节面的关节内骨折。与传统开放手术比较,经皮微创治疗在减少软组织损伤、降低伤口相关并发症风险及促进术后恢复方面具有一定优势。本文结合临床实践,对跟骨骨折经皮微创治疗的关键技术进行总结,内容包括术前影像学评估与手术规划、复位方法、内固定选择及术后管理。本文分析了该技术在临床应用中的主要难点,包括有限显露条件下解剖复位的实现、术中透视带来的辐射暴露,以及对术者经验要求较高等问题。在此基础上,归纳了围手术期质量控制要点,包括术前精准评估、术中规范操作及术后系统随访。建立较为完善的质量控制流程,有助于提高手术质量,降低并发症风险并改善病人预后。本文可为临床医师规范开展跟骨骨折经皮微创治疗提供参考,并为该技术的标准化应用提供依据。

关键词: 跟骨骨折, 经皮微创, 挑战, 质量控制

Abstract: Calcaneal fractures are the most common fractures of the foot,and approximately 75% are intra-articular injuries involving the subtalar joint.Compared with traditional open surgery,percutaneous minimally invasive treatment has shown several clinical advantages,including reduced soft-tissue trauma,a lower risk of wound-related complications,and faster postoperative recovery.From a practical clinical perspective,this article summarizes the key technical aspects of percutaneous minimally invasive treatment for calcaneal fractures,with particular attention to preoperative imaging evaluation and surgical planning,reduction strategies,selection of internal fixation,and postoperative management.In addition,it reviews the major challenges associated with this technique in current practice,including the difficulty of achieving anatomical reduction under limited visualization,radiation exposure related to repeated intraoperative fluoroscopy,and the relatively demanding learning curve for surgeons.On this basis,the article further outlines several targeted quality-control measures that may improve the consistency and safety of treatment,including precise preoperative assessment,standardized intraoperative procedures,and systematic postoperative follow-up and evaluation.Establishing a relatively complete quality control process may help improve surgical quality,reduce complications,and optimize patient outcomes.This article aims to provide a practical reference for clinicians and to support the standardized clinical application of this technique.

Key words: calcaneal fractures, minimally invasive percutaneous, challenges, quality-control

[1] 叶善平 吴灿 李太原. 机器人手术系统右半结肠切除经自然腔道取标本机器人手术系统方式选择与质量控制[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 463-465.
[2] 胡家瑞 宋明 余来. 经皮微创与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 881-884.
[3] 刘喜波 张春晖 刘继 范伯元 梁丰 沈江涛. 跟骨骨折术中保留腓骨肌腱鞘完整对后足活动的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(11): 1076-1079.
[4] 彭永胜 何久盛. 传统顺行置入载距突螺钉与逆行置入载距突螺钉治疗跟骨骨折疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1082-1085.
[5] 周志强 罗爱林. 麻醉专业质量控制指标(2020修订试行)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(1): 29-31.
[6] 张仕剑 祝茂松 夏进先 方强 周礼兵 邓杨. 3D打印点式接触导板辅助骶髂螺钉经皮微创置入一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(10): 923-925.
[7] 刘辉均, 丁茂乾, 任诗松. 经皮微创钢板接骨术技术结合锁定加压钢板内固定在四肢骨折创伤病人中的临床应用及对生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 78-81.
[8] 李绍春, 涂彦渊, 唐健雄. 机器人手术时代对疝外科的挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 731-733.
[9] 秦昌富, 陈杰, 申英末等. 中国疝病注册登记随访系统对我国疝和腹壁外科的推动作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 734-736.
[10] 李维, 黄永超. 经皮微创内固定联合术后唑来膦酸治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及对T细胞亚群的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 345-348.
[11] 余勤武;刘继超;陈先州等. 跟骨骨折46例治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 905-906.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!