临床外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 549-552.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240576

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声引导下股神经阻滞联合全身麻醉行全膝关节置换时不同麻醉深度监测差异性研究

  

  1. 200233  上海交通大学附属第六人民医院麻醉科(范颢、曾真);上海市第八人民医院麻醉科(钟剑平、张芳芳、曾真)
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-17 接受日期:2024-04-17 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 曾真,Email:zaczeng@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏大学医教协同创新基金资助项目(JLY2021103)

A study on the difference in anesthetic depth monitoring during total knee arthroplasty with ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block combined with general anesthesia

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital,Shanghai 200233,China
  • Received:2024-04-17 Accepted:2024-04-17 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-20

摘要: 目的 探讨超声引导下股神经阻滞联合全麻行全膝关节置换时不同麻醉深度监测之间的差异。方法 选择2021年1月~2021年3月在超声引导下股神经阻滞联合全麻下行全膝关节置换病人60例,随机分为意识指数(index of consciousness,IoC) 监测组(IoC组)及脑电双频指数 (bispectral index,BIS)监测组(BIS组),每组各30例。IoC组行IoC监测;BIS组行BIS监测,指导术中镇静镇痛药物使用。主要结局指标是病人首次睁眼时间,次要结局指标包括术中镇静、镇痛药物平均靶控浓度,围术期不良事件发生次数及苏醒质量等。结果 两组病人首次睁眼时间的平均差异为1.57分钟 (95%可信区间:-0.61~2.63),95%可信区间的上限2.63分钟小于非劣效界值 (δ=2.8分钟),提示主要疗效指标的非劣效性假设成立。 两组病人丙泊酚、舒芬太尼用量及苏醒质量比较差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05)。IoC组瑞芬太尼靶控浓度[(8.55±1.45)ng/ml ]显著高于BIS组[(4.62±0.96)ng/ml],两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与BIS组比较,IoC组术中应激性高血压发生次数 (10和32)显著减少,心动过缓发生次数 (17和6)显著增加,两组比较差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。两组病人均未发现有术中知晓及体动。结论 超声引导下股神经阻滞联合全麻行全膝关节置换时,IoC监测在苏醒速度及质量方面不劣于BIS监测,IoC组病人术中瑞芬太尼使用量增加而高血压发生率降低,这可能代表IoC监测对术中伤害性刺激更敏感。

关键词: 麻醉深度监测, 脑电监测, 脑电双频指数监测

Abstract: Objective To explore the differences between various monitoring methods of anesthetic depth during total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block.Methods From January 2021 to March 2021,60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block combined with general anesthesia were randomly divided into IoC group and BIS group,30 cases in each group.IoC group awareness index (Index of Consciousness,IoC) monitoring;bIS group was monitored by bispectral index (BIS) to guide the use of sedative and analgesic drugs during operation.The primary outcome measure was the time of first eye opening,and the secondary outcome measures included the average target concentration of sedative and analgesic drugs during operation,the number of perioperative adverse events and the quality of recovery.ResultsThe average difference in the first eye opening time between the two groups was 1.57 min (95% confidence interval:-0.61~2.63).The upper limit of the 95 % confidence interval was 2.63 min,which was less than the non-inferiority boundary value (δ=2.8 min),suggesting that the non-inferiority hypothesis of the main efficacy indicators was established.There was no significant difference in the dosage of propofol and sufentanil and the quality of recovery between the two groups (P>0.05).The target-controlled concentration of remifentanil in IoC group (8.55±1.45)ng/ml was significantly higher than that in BIS group (4.62±0.96) ng/ml,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).At the same time,compared with BIS group,the number of stress hypertension (10 vs 32) in IoC group was significantly reduced and the number of bradycardia (17 vs 6) was significantly increased,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).At the same time,no intraoperative awareness and body movement were found in both groups.Conclusion During total knee arthroplasty surgery under general anesthesia combined with ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block:1.IoC monitoring is not inferior to BIS monitoring in terms of awakening speed and quality.2.The increased use of remifentanil in the IoC group and the reduced incidence of hypertension may indicate that IoC monitoring is more sensitive to intraoperative nociceptive stimuli.

Key words: anesthesia depth monitoring, electroencephalography, bispectral index monitoring

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[2] 周观金;彭昊;陈森. 全膝关节置换治疗膝关节炎术后早期镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[3] 陈凛;崔建新. 胃癌术后复发与再手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 813 .
[4] 杨钦;张再重;王烈. 空肠间置术在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 816 .
[5] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[6] 宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[7] 孙金亚;陈伟;邓飞;等. 限制补液在胸外伤继发急性肺损伤或急性呼吸窘迫综合征治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 862 .
[8] 周振宇;汪路明;王一青;等. 肺部多发结节468例诊疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 865 .
[9] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[10] 金鑫;周鹏;赵文超;等. 肾脏混合性上皮间质肿瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 785 .