胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后放置胃管和无胃管对并发症的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.06.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后放置胃管和无胃管对并发症的影响。方法：2017年1月~2019年12月我院收治的食管癌病人150例，采用随机数字表法分为两组，A组75例，胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后不放置胃管，B组75例，胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后放置胃管。比较两组相关恢复指标结果、术后胃肠功能情况及并发症发生情况。结果A组术后胸管拔除时间为(3.19±0.65)天、住院时间为(7.98±1.01)天，B组分别为(5.32±0.74)天、(12.54±1.35)天，A组术后胸管拔除时间、住院时间均短于B组，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。A组术后肛门首次排气时间为(45.11±5.16)小时，首次排便时间为(48.19±5.67)小时、首次进食时间为(1.46±0.11)天，B组分别为(62.84±6.21)小时、(55.32±6.94)小时、(3.24±0.45)天，A组术后肛门首次排气时间、首次排便时间、首次进食时间均短于B组，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。A组术后总并发症发生为24.00%，B组术后总并发症发生为26.67%，两组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论：胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后不放置胃管可加快病人恢复，促进胃肠功能恢复，且不增加术后并发症的发生。

关键词: 食管癌, 微创手术, 根治术, 胃管, 并发症

Abstract: Objective：To explore the influence of the placement of gastric tube and no gastric tube after thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer on complications.Methods：150 patients with esophageal cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were selected as the research objects,and they were divided into group A by random number table(75 cases,no gastric tube was placed after thoracoscopic laparoscopic esophageal cancer radical resection),Group B(75 cases,gastric tube was placed after thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer).The results of related recovery indicators,postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications of the two groups were compared.Results：The postoperative chest tube removal time in group A was(3.19±0.65)d and the hospital stay was(7.98±1.01)d,group B was(5.32±0.74)d and(12.54±1.35)d,respectively.The chest tube removal time and hospital stay in group A were shorter than group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The first postoperative time of the anus in group A was(45.11±5.16)h,the time of first defecation was(48.19±5.67)h,the time of first eating was(1.46±0.11)d.The data of group B were (62.84±6.21)h,(55.32±6.94)h,(3.24±0.45)d,respectivly.The time of first air exhaust,first defecation and first eating time of the anus in group A were shorter than group B,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The total postoperative complications in group A was 24.00%,and the total postoperative complications in group B was 26.67%.There was no significant difference in the total postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion：The absence of a gastric tube after thoracolaparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer can speed up the patient's recovery,promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function,and will not increase the occurrence of postoperative complications.

Key words: esophageal cancer, minimally invasive surgery, radical operation, stomach tube, complication

唐德荣, 嵇建, 王前伟等. 胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术后放置胃管和无胃管对并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 538-541.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈义初, 余帅, 祁海杰等. 自体心包组织重建右室流出道肺动脉连接治疗肺动脉闭锁并室间隔缺损的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 508-511.
[2]	李亮, 李小玲, 路霖等. 杂交手术与支架象鼻术治疗复杂性B型主动脉夹层的近中期疗效分析及并发症危险因素的Logistic回归分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 526-529.
[3]	张凌中, 于洋, 于释然等. 控制营养状况评分在体外循环心脏术后不良结果预测中的价值分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 534-537.
[4]	冯青阳许剑民. 机器人结直肠癌手术中国专家共识(2020版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 405-408.
[5]	何京晶李敏哲沈荐. 右半结肠切除术后呼吸系统并发症危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 428-430.
[6]	张豪王自强. 直肠癌侧方清扫适应证及手术操作的要点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 495-498.
[7]	万志华吴瑞锋刘伟明蔡艳刘博于宁姚轶超. 3D胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗原发性肺癌的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(3): 269-272.
[8]	武四化, 刘胜海, 周飞. 全腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中BⅡ+Braun与Uncut RouxenY不同吻合方式的临床对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 154-157.
[9]	魏超, 李涛. 强直性脊柱炎合并弥漫性特发性骨肥厚腰椎术后翻修一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 170-173.
[10]	王志伟冯晶刘伟夏平. 经皮椎间孔镜罕见并发症类脊髓高压综合征一例报道[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(1): 50-52.
[11]	李继刘琼江辉. 椎板后阻滞对乳腺癌改良根治术病人术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(1): 65-67.
[12]	杨俊杨为民. 寡转移前列腺癌的手术治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(1): 96-98.
[13]	戴晓江. 关于袖状胃切除术现状和未来的思考[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 807-809.
[14]	陈国骥董志勇. 减重手术后Trocar疝的发生原因和预防策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 820-823.
[15]	高云飞展翼翼何丹阿迪力·萨来孙伟罗洞波. 食管癌根除术后合并吻合口漏的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 864-866.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed