临床外科杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 345-348.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.04.014

• • 上一篇    下一篇

颈椎动态稳定器植入术与Prestige LP人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的临床效果比较    

  

  1. 四川大学华西医院小儿外科
  • 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-04-20

Comparision of clinical results of Dynamic Cervical Implant inner fixation and Prestige LP artificial cervical replacement for the treatment of cervical disc herniation

  • Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-04-20

摘要: 目的:比较颈椎动态稳定器(dynamic cervical Implant,DCI)植入术与Prestige LP人工椎间置换术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的近中期临床疗效。方法:因颈椎间盘突出症在我院手术治疗的病人49例,按术式分为两组,A组DCI植入,B组采用Prestige LP人工椎间盘置换。比较两组病人VAS、JOA、SF36评分量表和活动度。结果:A组22例,平均随访24.5个月。B组27例,平均随访25.8个月。两组病人VAS、JOA和SF36评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组C2~7活动度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访B组手术节段活动度大于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),大于A组末次随访,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:DCI近中期临床效果与Prestige LP 人工椎间盘置换术相当,但前者理论上在一定程度上对手术节段小关节具有保护作用,具有更宽的适应证。

关键词: 颈椎间盘突出症, 颈椎动态稳定器, 颈椎间盘置换术, 非融合, 活动度

Abstract: Objective:To compare the midterm therapeutic effect of dynamic cervical implant(DCI) and Prestige LP artificial cervical replacement for the treatment of cervical disc herniation.Methods:49 patients were included for cervical disc herniation and underwent surgery in our hospital.They were divided into DCI group(Group A) and Prestige LP group(Group B).The VAS,JOA,SF36 and Range of motion(ROM) were compared of the two groups.Results:There were 22 patients in Group A,with a mean followup time of 24.5 months.27 patients were included in Group B,with a mean followup time of 25.8 months.The VAS,JOA and SF36 of the two groups were no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The ROM of C27 of the two groups showed no significant difference(P>0.05).The ROM of operated level was greater at last follow up than preoperation in Group B(P<0.05),and the ROM of operated level was greater in Group B than Group A at last follow up significantly(P<0.05).Conclusions:The clinical results in DCI were similar as Prestige LP artificial cervical replacement in earlymedium period.The semiconstrained feature of DCI may take protection for the facet joint of operated level to some extent and the indications was larger than cervical disc implantation.

Key words: cervical disc herniation, dynamic cervical implant, cervical disc replacement, nonfusion, range of motion

[1] 田海林 卢进 沈阳. 不同固定方式治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 326-330.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 马睿锐;陶元生;谌雁冰等. CO2气腹对人胃癌细胞株SGC7901增殖和转移能力的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 362 -0 .
[2] 李义亮;杜秀云;阿里木;等. 腹腔镜下腹膜透析置管术的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(1): 58 .
[3] 周稼;苗毅;喻春钊. 胰源性门静脉高压症研究现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(5): 393 .
[4] 黄毅 李梦帆 黄荣. 大隐静脉高位结扎联合腔内激光闭合术和泡沫硬化剂注射治疗下肢静脉曲张的对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 814 -817 .
[5] 曾峥, 王冰, 刘洋. 双极人工股骨头治疗股骨颈骨折合并帕金森病的疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 160 -162 .
[6] 欧阳学哲, 刘慧. 雄激素受体在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达及预后意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 227 -230 .
[7] 吴分浪, 关则俭, 陈盛勇等. 脑室腹腔分流术后颅内感染20例诊治体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 615 -617 .
[8] 陈双, 周太成. 食管裂孔疝解剖学观点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 745 -747 .
[9] 霍振清, 罗后宙, 梁冰等. miR-375,EPCA-2联合PSA对早期前列腺癌的诊断价值研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 809 -812 .
[10] 涂俊, 瞿广桥. MRI定量增强参数与乳腺癌预后因子及分子分型的相关性及其临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 859 -861 .